Suppr超能文献

多部位注射双侧竖脊肌平面阻滞用于控制腹膜假黏液瘤手术疼痛:一项单盲随机对照试验。

Bilateral erector spinae plane block by multiple injection for pain control in pseudomyxoma peritonei surgery: a single-blind randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Aerospace Center Hospital, No. 15 Yuquan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100049, China.

Department of Myxoma, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, 100049, China.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Oct 14;24(1):370. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02749-6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Currently, the primary surgical treatment for pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). The perioperative period is frequently accompanied by severe pain. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) can enhance analgesia for abdominal surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare the analgesic effects of bilateral multiple-injection ESPB in patients with PMP.

METHODS

Fifty patients with PMP were randomly divided into two groups: the ESPB combined with general anesthesia group (Group E) and the general anesthesia alone group (Group C). Prior to the induction, patients in Group E underwent ESPB at the T7 and T11 levels. The primary outcome was the visual analog scale (VAS) scores during rest at 6 h post-extubation. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption, time for first rescue analgesia, frequency distribution of rescue analgesia, incidence of nausea and vomiting, adverse events associated with ESPB.

RESULTS

The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores in Group E were significantly lower compared to Group C at immediate post-extubation (1.6 ± 0.9 vs. 2.4 ± 1.2, P = 0.008), and at 2 (1.9 ± 1.2 vs. 3.2 ± 1.1, P < 0.001), 4 (2.4 ± 1.5 vs. 3.7 ± 1.0, P = 0.001), and 6 h (2.7 ± 1.1 vs. 3.8 ± 1.4, P = 0.004) post-extubation during rest. Similarly, the VAS scores in Group E were significantly lower than those in Group C at immediate post-extubation (3.0 ± 1.4 vs. 4.6 ± 1.2, P < 0.001), and at 2 (3.8 ± 1.7 vs. 4.9 ± 1.4, P = 0.019), 4 (3.5 ± 1.3 vs. 5.3 ± 1.5, P < 0.001), and 6 h (3.9 ± 1.8 vs. 4.9 ± 1.3, P = 0.004) post-extubation during movement. In Group E, the intraoperative remifentanil administration (2319.3 ± 1089.5 vs. 2984.6 ± 796.1, P = 0.017) and the amount of rescue analgesia within 2 h post-extubation (0 vs. 4, P = 0.037) were significantly less than in Group C, and the first rescue analgesia time was shorter as well (231.4 ± 147.5 vs. 668.8 ± 416.7, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Compared to general anesthesia alone, bilateral multiple-injection ESPB with 0.2% ropivacaine can enhance analgesia and reduce opioid administration in patients with PMP. However, the duration of analgesia with ESPB is relatively short due to the low concentration of the local anesthetic used.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2300069504, 20/03/2023.

摘要

目的

目前,假性黏液瘤腹膜病(PMP)的主要治疗方法是细胞减灭术(CRS)联合腹腔内热灌注化疗(HIPEC)。围手术期常伴有剧烈疼痛。竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)可增强腹部手术的镇痛效果。本研究旨在比较双侧多点注射 ESPB 在 PMP 患者中的镇痛效果。

方法

将 50 例 PMP 患者随机分为两组:ESPB 联合全身麻醉组(E 组)和单纯全身麻醉组(C 组)。在诱导前,E 组患者在 T7 和 T11 水平进行 ESPB。主要结局为拔管后 6 小时静息时的视觉模拟评分(VAS)。次要结局包括术中及术后阿片类药物用量、首次解救性镇痛时间、解救性镇痛频次分布、恶心呕吐发生率、ESPB 相关不良事件。

结果

E 组患者在拔管即刻(1.6±0.9 比 2.4±1.2,P=0.008)、拔管后 2 小时(1.9±1.2 比 3.2±1.1,P<0.001)、4 小时(2.4±1.5 比 3.7±1.0,P=0.001)和 6 小时(2.7±1.1 比 3.8±1.4,P=0.004)静息时的 VAS 评分均显著低于 C 组。同样,E 组患者在拔管即刻(3.0±1.4 比 4.6±1.2,P<0.001)和拔管后 2 小时(3.8±1.7 比 4.9±1.4,P=0.019)、4 小时(3.5±1.3 比 5.3±1.5,P<0.001)和 6 小时(3.9±1.8 比 4.9±1.3,P=0.004)运动时的 VAS 评分均显著低于 C 组。E 组患者术中瑞芬太尼用量(2319.3±1089.5 比 2984.6±796.1,P=0.017)和拔管后 2 小时内解救性镇痛用量(0 比 4,P=0.037)均显著少于 C 组,首次解救性镇痛时间也更短(231.4±147.5 比 668.8±416.7,P<0.001)。

结论

与单纯全身麻醉相比,双侧多点注射 0.2%罗哌卡因的 ESPB 可增强 PMP 患者的镇痛效果,减少阿片类药物的使用。然而,由于使用的局部麻醉剂浓度较低,ESPB 的镇痛持续时间相对较短。

试验注册

中国临床试验注册中心,ChiCTR2300069504,2023 年 3 月 20 日。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验