• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良型经尿道中段吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁:与传统经闭孔吊带术的前瞻性随机对照研究三年结果比较。

A modified mid-urethral sling technique for stress urinary incontinence: Three-year results of a prospective randomized trial in comparison with original transobturator tape procedure.

机构信息

Trabzon Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences, Trabzon, Turkey.

Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital, Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Jul;34(7):1429-1436. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05381-5. Epub 2022 Oct 10.

DOI:10.1007/s00192-022-05381-5
PMID:36214818
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is the most common subtype of urinary incontinence, which causes many social, psychological, and economic problems. Mid-urethral sling (MUS) surgery is popular worldwide for the treatment of SUI. We aimed to define a new modified mid-urethral sling technique (mMUS) in SUI treatment and to compare it with transobturator tape (TOT) surgery in terms of safety and efficiency.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized study was planned with 126 women suffering from SUI. The patients were randomly divided into two groups, TOT and mMUS. In mMUS, the obturator membrane was not perforated. The objective and subjective symptoms, pain, quality-of-life measures, and side effect profiles were assessed in a 3-year follow-up. The visual analogue scale (VAS) was used for postoperative pain assessment. The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (ICIQ-FLUTS) and Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) were used for cure assessment scales.

RESULTS

In total, 96 patients completed 3-year follow-up (TOT, n = 49 and mMUS, n = 47). There was no statistical difference between the procedures in terms of cure rates (87.75% and 87.23%, respectively; p = 0.614). Mean VAS scores at 8 and 24 h postoperatively were significantly higher in the TOT group (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups in VAS scores after 24 h. There was no significant difference between groups in terms of pad test results, ICIQ, or PGI scores at baseline and 36 months after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

We showed that the mMUS procedure was as safe and effective as TOT, with less postoperative groin pain and complications.

摘要

引言和假设

压力性尿失禁(SUI)是最常见的尿失禁类型,会导致许多社会、心理和经济问题。全球范围内,尿道中段悬吊带(MUS)手术是治疗 SUI 的常用方法。我们旨在定义一种新的改良尿道中段悬吊带技术(mMUS)用于治疗 SUI,并比较其与经闭孔吊带(TOT)手术在安全性和有效性方面的差异。

方法

我们计划进行一项前瞻性、随机研究,共纳入 126 例 SUI 患者。患者被随机分为 TOT 和 mMUS 两组。在 mMUS 中,闭孔膜未穿孔。在 3 年的随访中,评估患者的客观和主观症状、疼痛、生活质量指标和副作用情况。术后疼痛评估采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)。采用国际尿失禁咨询委员会女性下尿路症状问卷(ICIQ-FLUTS)和患者整体改善印象(PGI-I)评估治愈情况。

结果

共有 96 例患者完成了 3 年随访(TOT 组,n=49;mMUS 组,n=47)。在治愈率方面,两种手术方法之间无统计学差异(分别为 87.75%和 87.23%;p=0.614)。TOT 组术后 8 小时和 24 小时的平均 VAS 评分明显更高(p<0.05)。两组术后 24 小时的 VAS 评分无显著差异。两组间基线和术后 36 个月的垫试验结果、ICIQ 和 PGI 评分无显著差异。

结论

我们表明,mMUS 手术与 TOT 一样安全有效,术后腹股沟疼痛和并发症较少。

相似文献

1
A modified mid-urethral sling technique for stress urinary incontinence: Three-year results of a prospective randomized trial in comparison with original transobturator tape procedure.改良型经尿道中段吊带术治疗压力性尿失禁:与传统经闭孔吊带术的前瞻性随机对照研究三年结果比较。
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Jul;34(7):1429-1436. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05381-5. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
2
Prospective randomized comparison of the transobturator mid-urethral sling with the single-incision sling among women with stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up study.压力性尿失禁女性经闭孔中尿道吊带与单切口吊带的前瞻性随机对照研究:1年随访研究
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 May;27(5):791-6. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2895-2. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
3
Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women.女性压力性尿失禁的经尿道中段吊带手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 31;7(7):CD006375. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub4.
4
Long-term efficacy and complications of a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing retropubic and transobturator mid-urethral slings: a prospective observational study.经耻骨后与经闭孔尿道中段吊带术治疗女性压力性尿失禁的多中心随机对照临床试验的长期疗效及并发症:一项前瞻性观察研究。
BJOG. 2021 Dec;128(13):2191-2199. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16899. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
5
Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women.女性压力性尿失禁的中段尿道吊带手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 1(7):CD006375. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub3.
6
A randomized comparison of a single-incision needleless (Contasure-needleless®) mini-sling versus an inside-out transobturator (Contasure-KIM®) mid-urethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 24-month follow-up results.单切口无针(Contasure-needleless®)迷你吊带与经闭孔由内向外(Contasure-KIM®)中尿道吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的随机对照比较:24个月随访结果
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Sep;29(9):1387-1395. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3624-4. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
7
Modified Autologous Transobturator Tape Surgery - A Prospective Comparison With Transobturator Tape Surgery.改良自体经闭孔尿道中段悬吊带手术——与经闭孔尿道中段悬吊带手术的前瞻性比较
Urology. 2020 Dec;146:72-78. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.09.018. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
8
A randomized comparison of a single-incision midurethral sling and a transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: results of 12-mo follow-up.经阴道单切口和经闭孔尿道中段吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的随机对照研究:12 个月随访结果。
Eur Urol. 2014 Dec;66(6):1179-85. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.027. Epub 2014 Aug 29.
9
Modified autologous transobturator tape surgery - evaluation of short term results.改良自体经闭孔悬吊带术 - 短期疗效评价。
Ginekol Pol. 2020;91(2):51-56. doi: 10.5603/GP.2020.0016.
10
A new validated score for detecting patient-reported success on postoperative ICIQ-SF: a novel two-stage analysis from two large RCT cohorts.一种用于检测患者报告的术后ICIQ-SF成功情况的新验证评分:来自两个大型随机对照试验队列的新型两阶段分析。
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Jan;28(1):95-100. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3070-0. Epub 2016 Jul 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Single Incision Mini-Sling Versus Mid-Urethral Sling (Transobturator/Retropubic) in Females With Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.单切口迷你吊带术与女性压力性尿失禁的中段尿道吊带术(经闭孔/耻骨后)对比:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2023 Apr 18;15(4):e37773. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37773. eCollection 2023 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Stress Incontinence in Women.女性压力性尿失禁
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 24;384(25):2428-2436. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1914037.
2
Modified Autologous Transobturator Tape Surgery - A Prospective Comparison With Transobturator Tape Surgery.改良自体经闭孔尿道中段悬吊带手术——与经闭孔尿道中段悬吊带手术的前瞻性比较
Urology. 2020 Dec;146:72-78. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.09.018. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
3
Validation of the Turkish version of the ICIQ-FLUTS, ICIQ-FLUTS long-form, ICIQ-LUTS quality-of-life, and ICIQ-FLUTS sexual functions.验证土耳其版的 ICIQ-FLUTS、ICIQ-FLUTS 长式问卷、ICIQ-LUTS 生活质量问卷和 ICIQ-FLUTS 性功能问卷。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2020 Mar;39(3):962-968. doi: 10.1002/nau.24302. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
4
Urinary Incontinence in Women.女性尿失禁。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Feb 4;172(3):ITC17-ITC32. doi: 10.7326/AITC202002040.
5
Guideline of guidelines: urinary incontinence in women.指南之指南:女性尿失禁
BJU Int. 2020 May;125(5):638-655. doi: 10.1111/bju.14927. Epub 2020 Mar 8.
6
Burch colposuspension.Burch 阴道悬吊术。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2019 Feb;38(2):553-562. doi: 10.1002/nau.23905. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
7
Changing surgical trends for female stress urinary incontinence in England.英国女性压力性尿失禁手术趋势的变化
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Feb;30(2):203-209. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3839-4. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
8
Burch Colposuspension.伯奇阴道悬吊术
Urol Clin North Am. 2019 Feb;46(1):53-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2018.08.002.
9
Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence: Autologous Fascial Sling.压力性尿失禁的手术治疗:自体筋膜吊带术。
Urol Clin North Am. 2019 Feb;46(1):41-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2018.08.014.
10
Prospective and randomized clinical trial comparing transobturator versus retropubic sling in terms of efficacy and safety.一项前瞻性随机临床试验,比较经闭孔吊带术与耻骨后吊带术的疗效和安全性。
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Jan;29(1):29-35. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3495-0. Epub 2017 Oct 2.