• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

辅助生殖技术对韩国单胎和多胎严重孕产妇发病率风险的影响:一项全国基于人群的队列研究。

Effects of assisted reproductive technology on severe maternal morbidity risk in both singleton and multiple births in Korea: A nationwide population-based cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Healthcare Management, Eulji University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.

Department of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Oct 10;17(10):e0275857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275857. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0275857
PMID:36215280
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9550088/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Whether infertility treatment predicts severe maternal morbidity in both singleton and twin pregnancies is controversial. We conducted this nationwide population-based cohort study to compare pregnancies conceived through assisted reproductive technology treatments, such as intrauterine insemination or in vitro fertilization, with unassisted pregnancies.

METHODS

This study included 269,930 women who experienced childbirth in 2018, using data of the National Health Insurance Service National Delivery Cohort in Korea. The primary outcome was assessed using a severe maternal morbidity algorithm developed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the United States. A modified Poisson regression was used to estimate the adjusted risk ratio of severe maternal morbidity.

RESULTS

Severe maternal morbidity occurred in 6,333 (2.3%) of 280,612 deliveries investigated. The risk of severe maternal morbidity was approximately 1.5-fold higher among women who received in vitro fertilization (risk ratio: 1.51, 95% confidence interval: 1.36-1.68) than among fertile women. However, no significant association between intrauterine insemination and maternal morbidity was identified. Via subgroup analysis, in vitro fertilization increased the risk of severe maternal morbidity by 1.6- and 1.3-fold in singleton and multiple births, respectively (singleton: risk ratio: 1.62, 95% confidence interval: 1.43-1.83; multiple birth: risk ratio: 1.31, 95% confidence interval: 1.07-1.60).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggested that in vitro fertilization was associated with the risk of severe maternal morbidity in both singleton and multiple births. Further research should identify patient- and treatment-specific factors that may mitigate or prevent adverse maternal health risks.

摘要

背景

不孕治疗是否会预测单胎和双胎妊娠的严重产妇发病率尚存在争议。我们进行了这项全国性基于人群的队列研究,比较了通过辅助生殖技术治疗(如宫腔内人工授精或体外受精)受孕的妊娠与未经辅助的妊娠。

方法

本研究纳入了 2018 年分娩的 269930 名女性,数据来源于韩国国家健康保险服务国家分娩队列。主要结局使用美国疾病控制与预防中心开发的严重产妇发病率算法进行评估。采用修正泊松回归估计严重产妇发病率的调整风险比。

结果

在 280612 次分娩中,6333 例(2.3%)发生严重产妇发病率。与生育能力正常的女性相比,接受体外受精的女性严重产妇发病率风险约高 1.5 倍(风险比:1.51,95%置信区间:1.36-1.68)。然而,宫腔内人工授精与产妇发病率之间无显著相关性。通过亚组分析,体外受精分别使单胎和多胎妊娠发生严重产妇发病率的风险增加 1.6 倍和 1.3 倍(单胎:风险比:1.62,95%置信区间:1.43-1.83;多胎:风险比:1.31,95%置信区间:1.07-1.60)。

结论

本研究表明,体外受精与单胎和多胎妊娠的严重产妇发病率风险相关。进一步的研究应确定可能减轻或预防不良产妇健康风险的患者和治疗特异性因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8ee/9550088/b308e00d7c9e/pone.0275857.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8ee/9550088/b308e00d7c9e/pone.0275857.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8ee/9550088/b308e00d7c9e/pone.0275857.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of assisted reproductive technology on severe maternal morbidity risk in both singleton and multiple births in Korea: A nationwide population-based cohort study.辅助生殖技术对韩国单胎和多胎严重孕产妇发病率风险的影响:一项全国基于人群的队列研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 10;17(10):e0275857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275857. eCollection 2022.
2
Pregnancy and birth outcomes in couples with infertility with and without assisted reproductive technology: with an emphasis on US population-based studies.有或无辅助生殖技术的不孕夫妇的妊娠和分娩结局:重点关注美国基于人群的研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Sep;217(3):270-281. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.03.012. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
3
Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance — United States, 2012.辅助生殖技术监测—美国,2012 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015 Aug 14;64(6):1-29.
4
Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2011.辅助生殖技术监测——美国,2011 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2014 Nov 21;63(10):1-28.
5
Pregnancy outcomes after assisted human reproduction.人类辅助生殖后的妊娠结局
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014 Jan;36(1):64-83. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30685-X.
6
Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - 
United States, 2013.辅助生殖技术监测报告——美国,2013 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015 Dec 4;64(11):1-25. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6411a1.
7
Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2018.辅助生殖技术监测报告——美国,2018 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2022 Feb 18;71(4):1-19. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7104a1.
8
Pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes by maternal fertility status: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology.孕产妇生育状况与妊娠、分娩及婴儿结局:马萨诸塞州辅助生殖技术结局研究
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Sep;217(3):327.e1-327.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.04.006. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
9
Increased risk of severe maternal morbidity among infertile women: analysis of US claims data.不孕女性发生严重产妇病的风险增加:美国理赔数据分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;223(3):404.e1-404.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.027. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
10
Assisted reproductive technology surveillance -- United States, 2010.辅助生殖技术监测--美国,2010 年。
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2013 Dec 6;62(9):1-24.

引用本文的文献

1
A Survey of Utilization and Satisfaction of Korean Subfertility Treatment among Korean Women.韩国女性对韩国生育治疗的利用情况与满意度调查
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Aug 12;12(16):1600. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12161600.
2
Global burden of potentially life-threatening maternal conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.全球潜在危及生命的孕产妇状况负担:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Jan 2;24(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06199-9.
3
Association between Delivery during Off-Hours and the Risk of Severe Maternal Morbidity: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Changes in Multiple Birth Rates and Parental Demographic Factors in South Korea During the Last Four Decades: 1981-2019.在过去四十年中韩国多胎出生率和父母人口统计学因素的变化:1981-2019 年。
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2021 Jun;24(3):163-167. doi: 10.1017/thg.2021.23. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
2
Effects of psychological intervention for Korean infertile women under In Vitro Fertilization on infertility stress, depression, intimacy, sexual satisfaction and fatigue.心理干预对接受体外受精的韩国不孕女性的不孕压力、抑郁、亲密关系、性满意度和疲劳的影响。
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2020 Aug;34(4):211-217. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2020.05.001. Epub 2020 May 5.
3
非工作时间分娩与严重孕产妇发病风险之间的关联:一项基于全国人口的队列研究。
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 28;12(21):6818. doi: 10.3390/jcm12216818.
4
The impact of assisted reproductive technology treatment coverage on marriage, pregnancy, and childbirth in women of childbearing age: an interrupted time-series analysis.辅助生殖技术治疗覆盖对育龄妇女婚姻、妊娠和分娩的影响:一项中断时间序列分析。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jul 18;23(1):1379. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16286-3.
5
Evaluation of Assisted Reproductive Technology Health Insurance Coverage for Multiple Pregnancies and Births in Korea.韩国对辅助生殖技术多胎妊娠和分娩的健康保险覆盖范围的评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2316696. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.16696.
Reproductive technologies as population control: how pronatalist policies harm reproductive health in South Korea.
生殖技术作为人口控制手段:亲生育政策如何损害韩国的生殖健康。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2019 May;27(2):1610278. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2019.1610278.
4
Association of Maternal Age With Severe Maternal Morbidity and Mortality in Canada.母亲年龄与加拿大严重孕产妇发病率和死亡率的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e199875. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.9875.
5
Complications and adverse outcomes in pregnancy and childbirth among women who conceived by assisted reproductive technologies: a nationwide birth cohort study of Japan environment and children's study.辅助生殖技术受孕女性妊娠和分娩的并发症和不良结局:日本环境与儿童研究的全国性出生队列研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Feb 20;19(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2213-y.
6
Infertility treatment and risk of severe maternal morbidity: a propensity score-matched cohort study.不孕症治疗与严重产妇发病率的风险:倾向评分匹配队列研究。
CMAJ. 2019 Feb 4;191(5):E118-E127. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.181124.
7
Severe maternal morbidity: screening and review.严重孕产妇发病情况:筛查与评估
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;215(3):B17-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.07.050. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
8
Impact of fertility treatment on severe maternal morbidity.生育治疗对孕产妇严重发病的影响。
Fertil Steril. 2016 Aug;106(2):423-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.039. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
9
Cohort Profile: The National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort (NHIS-NSC), South Korea.队列简介:韩国国民健康保险服务国家样本队列(NHIS-NSC)
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Apr 1;46(2):e15. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv319.
10
Trends in Severe Maternal Morbidity After Assisted Reproductive Technology in the United States, 2008-2012.2008 - 2012年美国辅助生殖技术后严重孕产妇发病率的趋势
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jan;127(1):59-66. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001197.