Holland Patrick, Karmas Efthimios, Merrimen Jennifer, Wood Lori A
Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
QEII Health Sciences Centre, Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Can Urol Assoc J. 2023 Feb;17(2):44-48. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8030.
Cancer registries are the mainstay for Canadian population-based cancer statistics. Data are collected in provincial and territorial registries, including the Nova Scotia Cancer Registry (NS CR). The goal of this study was to determine the accuracy of NS CR data for germ cell tumors (GCT).
This analysis included all NS CR patients diagnosed with GCT from 2006-2015. The date and method of diagnosis, primary site, histology, and stage were recorded from the NS CR and compared to each patient's chart. Any discrepancies between the two sources were reviewed and reasons behind the discrepancies recorded.
A total of 229 patients made up the study cohort. Using NS CR data, 57.6% had seminoma, 34.5% non-seminoma (NSG CT), and 7.9% other. Discrepancies in pathology were noted in 16 patients (7.0%). Using NS CR staging data (available in 185 cases), 71.9% had stage I, 12.4% stage II, 11.9% stage III, and 3.8% other. Discrepancies in stage were noted in 32 patients (17.3%) with NS CR data downstaging eight patients (4.3%) and upstaging 21 patients (11.4%). The site of the primary GCT was discrepant in 12 patients (5.2%). The date of diagnosis was accurate within one week for all patients except one.
Higher-level NS CR data, such as date of diagnosis and overall pathological diagnosis, appear relatively accurate; however, there are inaccuracies in histological subtype and stage. This study raises awareness of these gaps and highlights key areas for improvement in educating registry personnel who interpret and enter data about the uniqueness of GCT pathology, staging, and interpretation of tumor markers.
癌症登记处是加拿大基于人群的癌症统计数据的主要来源。数据在省级和地区登记处收集,包括新斯科舍省癌症登记处(NS CR)。本研究的目的是确定NS CR中生殖细胞肿瘤(GCT)数据的准确性。
本分析纳入了2006年至2015年期间所有被NS CR诊断为GCT的患者。从NS CR中记录诊断日期和方法、原发部位、组织学和分期,并与每位患者的病历进行比较。对两个来源之间的任何差异进行审查,并记录差异背后的原因。
共有229名患者组成了研究队列。根据NS CR数据,57.6%为精原细胞瘤,34.5%为非精原细胞瘤(NSG CT),7.9%为其他类型。16名患者(7.0%)存在病理差异。根据NS CR分期数据(185例可用),71.9%为I期,12.4%为II期,11.9%为III期,3.8%为其他。32名患者(17.3%)存在分期差异,NS CR数据将8名患者(4.3%)分期下调,21名患者(11.4%)分期上调。12名患者(5.2%)的原发GCT部位存在差异。除1名患者外,所有患者的诊断日期在一周内准确。
NS CR的高级数据,如诊断日期和总体病理诊断,似乎相对准确;然而,组织学亚型和分期存在不准确之处。本研究提高了对这些差距的认识,并突出了在教育登记人员方面需要改进的关键领域,这些人员负责解释和输入有关GCT病理、分期和肿瘤标志物解释的独特性的数据。