• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[自体静脉股腘动脉搭桥术的不同方法:倾向评分匹配分析]

[Different methods of femoropopliteal bypass grafting with autologous vein: propensity score matching analysis].

作者信息

Zakeryaev A B, Vinogradov R A, Sukhoruchkin P V, Butaev S R, Bakhishev T E, Urakov E R, Baryshev A G, Porkhanov V A

机构信息

Research Institute - Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1, Krasnodar, Russia.

Kuban State Medical University, Krasnodar, Russia.

出版信息

Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2022(10):44-50. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia202210144.

DOI:10.17116/hirurgia202210144
PMID:36223149
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze immediate and long-term results of various methods of femoropopliteal bypass grafting with autologous vein using propensity score matching.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective single-center open study included 464 patients who underwent femoropopliteal bypass grafting with an autologous vein between January 10, 2016 and December 25, 2019 at the Research Institute - Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital No. 1. The following types of autovenous conduits were used: =266 - reversed autologous vein (group 1); =59 - autologous vein (group 2); =73 - upper limb autologous vein (group 3); =66 - autologous vein (group 4). The long-term period was 16.6±10.3 months.

RESULTS

We used propensity score matching analysis because patients were not comparable for some indicators. Groups 2-4 included small samples of patients, and their number was reduced to less than 10. This did not allow us to draw reliable conclusions about treatment outcomes. In this situation, we decided to allocate two groups: group 1 - femoropopliteal bypass grafting; group 2 - other variants of femoropopliteal bypass grafting with autologous vein. Propensity score matching allocated 299 people in group 1 and 46 patients in group 2. There were significant differences in early postoperative incidence of autologous vein thrombosis (group 1: =3 (6.5%), group 2: =79 (26.4%), =0.003; OR= 0.19; 95% CI 0.05-0.64) and postoperative wound suppuration (group 1: =2 (4.3%), group 2: =52 (17.4%); =0.02; OR=0.21; 95% CI 0.05-0.91). In long-term postoperative period, significant differences were obtained in the incidence of limb amputation (group 1: =6 (13%), group 2: =85 (28.4%); =0.02; OR=0.37; 95% CI 0.15-0.92) and myocardial infarction (group 1: =1 (2.2%), group 2: =43 (14.4%); =0.02; OR 0.13; 95% CI 0.01-0.98).

CONCLUSION

Femoropopliteal bypass grafting is characterized by lower incidence of graft thrombosis, amputations of the limb, mild decrease in the incidence of infectious complications and all adverse cardiovascular events in early and late postoperative period compared to conventional surgery (reversed autologous vein, autologous vein, upper limb autologous vein).

摘要

目的

采用倾向评分匹配法分析自体静脉股腘动脉搭桥术不同方法的近期和远期效果。

材料与方法

一项回顾性单中心开放性研究纳入了2016年1月10日至2019年12月25日期间在奥恰波夫斯基第一地区临床医院研究所接受自体静脉股腘动脉搭桥术的464例患者。使用了以下几种自体静脉导管:=266例 - 自体静脉倒置(第1组);=59例 - 自体静脉(第2组);=73例 - 上肢自体静脉(第3组);=66例 - 自体静脉(第4组)。长期随访时间为16.6±10.3个月。

结果

由于患者在某些指标上不具有可比性,我们采用倾向评分匹配分析。第2 - 4组患者样本量较小,其数量减少至不足10例。这使我们无法就治疗结果得出可靠结论。在这种情况下,我们决定分为两组:第1组 - 股腘动脉搭桥术;第2组 - 自体静脉股腘动脉搭桥术的其他术式。倾向评分匹配法在第组分配了299人,第2组分配了46例患者。术后早期自体静脉血栓形成的发生率存在显著差异(第1组:=3例(6.5%),第2组:=79例(26.4%),=0.003;OR = 0.19;95% CI 0.05 - 0.64)以及术后伤口化脓情况(第1组:=2例(4.3%),第2组:=例(17.4%);=0.02;OR = 0.21;95% CI 0.05 - 0.91)。在术后长期,肢体截肢发生率(第1组:=6例(13%),第2组:=85例(28.4%);=0.02;OR = 0.37;95% CI 0.15 - 0.92)和心肌梗死发生率(第1组:=1例(2.2%),第2组:=43例(14.4%);=0.02;OR 0.13;95% CI 0.01 - 0.98)存在显著差异。

结论

与传统手术(自体静脉倒置、自体静脉、上肢自体静脉)相比,股腘动脉搭桥术的特点是移植物血栓形成、肢体截肢发生率较低,术后早期和晚期感染并发症及所有不良心血管事件的发生率轻度降低。

相似文献

1
[Different methods of femoropopliteal bypass grafting with autologous vein: propensity score matching analysis].[自体静脉股腘动脉搭桥术的不同方法:倾向评分匹配分析]
Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2022(10):44-50. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia202210144.
2
[Results of using various methods of autovenous femoropopliteal bypass grafting below the knee-joint fissure].[膝关节裂隙以下自体股腘动脉旁路移植术不同方法的应用结果]
Angiol Sosud Khir. 2016;22(4):137-143.
3
Evaluation of Long-Term Outcomes of Femoropopliteal Bypass Surgery in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia in an Endovascular Era.血管腔内治疗时代慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者股腘动脉搭桥手术的长期疗效评估
Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Feb;79:191-200. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.06.046. Epub 2021 Oct 10.
4
Comparison of graft patency, limb salvage, and antithrombotic therapy between prosthetic and autogenous below-knee bypass for critical limb ischemia.人工血管与自体血管膝下旁路移植术治疗严重肢体缺血的移植物通畅率、保肢情况及抗血栓治疗比较
Ann Vasc Surg. 2013 Nov;27(8):1134-45. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.01.019. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
5
Femoropopliteal prosthetic bypass with glutaraldehyde stabilized human umbilical vein (HUV).采用戊二醛固定人脐静脉(HUV)的股腘人工血管搭桥术。
J Vasc Surg. 2007 Aug;46(2):280-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.03.054. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
6
Effectiveness of continuous unsupervised exercise therapy after above-knee femoropopliteal bypass.膝上股腘旁路术后持续非监督运动疗法的效果。
Vascular. 2021 Jun;29(3):387-395. doi: 10.1177/1708538120957488. Epub 2020 Sep 21.
7
The choice of material for above-knee femoropopliteal bypass. A 20-year experience.膝上股腘动脉搭桥术的材料选择。20年经验。
Arch Surg. 1994 Mar;129(3):297-302. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1994.01420270073017.
8
[Changes in deep femoral artery topography during open revascularization of the lower limbs].[下肢开放血管重建术中股深动脉形态的变化]
Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2022(1):59-64. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia202201159.
9
Angiosarcoma of a Femoropopliteal Bypass Thrombosed Vein Graft.股腘旁路血栓静脉移植物的血管肉瘤。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2022 May;56(4):448-453. doi: 10.1177/15385744221077824. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
10
In situ versus reversed femoropopliteal vein grafts: long-term follow-up of a prospective, randomized trial.
Br J Surg. 1992 Aug;79(8):750-2. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800790809.