秋水仙碱治疗骨关节炎的疗效和安全性:干预试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Efficacy and safety of colchicine for the treatment of osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention trials.
机构信息
Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, 17 Liverpool St, Hobart, Tasexermania, 7000, Australia.
Virgen de Las Nieves University Hospital, Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain.
出版信息
Clin Rheumatol. 2023 Mar;42(3):889-902. doi: 10.1007/s10067-022-06402-w. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
OBJECTIVE
Colchicine, an approved treatment for gout, has been trialed in many diseases including osteoarthritis (OA) due to its anti-inflammatory effects. However, its efficacy and safety remain unclear in OA. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of colchicine for the treatment of OA.
METHODS
PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Central were searched from inception through September 2022. Two reviewers independently screened for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing colchicine with placebo or other active comparators for the treatment of OA (knee, hand, or hip OA), extracted data, and performed Cochrane risk of bias assessments.
RESULT
Nine RCTs for the knee OA and one for the hand OA were identified, consisting of 847 patients (429 in colchicine arms, 409 in control arms). The studies were conducted between 2002 and 2021 with follow-up periods ranging from 2 to 12 months, in India, Iran, Turkey, Australia, Singapore, and Iraq. Moderate-quality evidence showed no clinically important pain reduction with colchicine compared to control (standardized mean difference [SMD], 0.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], - 0.55, 0.22). Moderate-quality evidence showed no improvement in function with colchicine compared to control in knee OA patients (SMD, - 0.37; 95% CI, - 0.87, 0.13). Colchicine showed an acceptable safety profile with AEs/SAEs comparable to control.
CONCLUSION
Current evidence does not suggest a benefit of colchicine in reducing pain and improving physical function in the overall cohort of hand/knee OA patients. Future trials should focus on the subgroups of OA patients with local or systemic inflammation and/or mineralization who might benefit from colchicine.
目的
秋水仙碱是一种已被批准用于治疗痛风的药物,由于其抗炎作用,已在许多疾病中进行了试验,包括骨关节炎(OA)。然而,其在 OA 中的疗效和安全性仍不清楚。本系统评价和荟萃分析评估了秋水仙碱治疗 OA 的疗效和安全性。
方法
从建库到 2022 年 9 月,我们在 PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus 和 Cochrane Central 中进行了检索。两位评审员独立筛选了比较秋水仙碱与安慰剂或其他活性对照药物治疗 OA(膝、手或髋 OA)的随机对照试验(RCT),提取数据并进行 Cochrane 偏倚风险评估。
结果
共确定了 9 项膝 OA 研究和 1 项手 OA 研究,共纳入 847 名患者(秋水仙碱组 429 名,对照组 409 名)。这些研究于 2002 年至 2021 年进行,随访时间为 2 至 12 个月,研究地点包括印度、伊朗、土耳其、澳大利亚、新加坡和伊拉克。中等质量证据表明,与对照组相比,秋水仙碱治疗并未显著减轻疼痛(标准化均数差 [SMD],0.17;95%置信区间 [CI],-0.55,0.22)。中等质量证据表明,与对照组相比,秋水仙碱治疗并未改善膝 OA 患者的功能(SMD,-0.37;95%CI,-0.87,0.13)。秋水仙碱的安全性良好,不良反应/严重不良事件发生率与对照组相当。
结论
目前的证据表明,秋水仙碱不能减轻手/膝 OA 患者的疼痛和改善身体功能。未来的试验应集中在那些可能受益于秋水仙碱的局部或全身炎症和/或矿化的 OA 患者亚组。
相似文献
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-5-22
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-1-28
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2005
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-10-17
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2023-1
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-4-17
引用本文的文献
本文引用的文献
Life (Basel). 2022-8-24
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021-7-2
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2022-1
J Clin Psychiatry. 2020-9-22