Lawson Kevin, Hwang Katherine L, Montgomery Spencer, Amanatullah Derek F, Huddleston James I, Maloney William J, Goodman Stuart B
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, 450 Broadway Street, M/C 6342, Redwood City, CA, 94063-6342, USA.
Int Orthop. 2023 Jan;47(1):117-124. doi: 10.1007/s00264-022-05608-6. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with small or unusual proximal femoral anatomy is challenging due to sizing issues, control of version, and implant fixation. The Wagner Cone is a monoblock, fluted, tapered stem with successful outcomes for these patients; however, there is limited information on subsidence, a common finding with cementless stems.
We retrospectively reviewed our cases using the modified Wagner Cone (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) implanted over a 13-year period (2006-2019) in patients with small or abnormal proximal femoral anatomy. We performed 144 primary THAs in 114 patients using this prosthesis. Mean follow-up was 4.5 ± 3.4 years (range, 1-13 years). Common reasons for implantation were hip dysplasia (52%) and osteoarthritis in patients with small femoral proportions (22%). Analysis of outcomes included assessment of stem subsidence and stability.
Survival was 98.6% in aseptic cases; revision-free survival was 97.9%. Femoral subsidence occurred in 84 cases (58%). No subsidence progressed after 3 months. Of those that subsided, the mean distance was 2.8 ± 2.0 mm. There was less subsidence in stems that stabilized prior to six weeks (2.2 ± 1.4 mm) compared to those that continued until 12 weeks (3.9 ± 1.6, p = 0.02). Harris Hip, UCLA, and WOMAC scores significantly improved from pre-operative evaluation (p < 0.001*, p < 0.003*, p ≪ 0.001*); there was no difference in outcome between patients with and without subsidence (p = 0.430, p = 0.228, p = 0.147).
The modified Wagner Cone demonstrates excellent clinical outcomes in patients with challenging proximal femoral anatomy. Subsidence is minor, stops by 3 months, and does not compromise clinical outcome.
对于股骨近端解剖结构较小或异常的患者,全髋关节置换术(THA)因尺寸问题、前倾角控制和植入物固定而具有挑战性。瓦格纳锥柄是一种整体式、带槽、锥形柄,在这些患者中取得了成功的治疗效果;然而,关于下沉(这是无骨水泥柄常见的情况)的信息有限。
我们回顾性分析了在13年期间(2006 - 2019年)为股骨近端解剖结构较小或异常的患者植入改良瓦格纳锥柄(Zimmer,华沙,印第安纳州)的病例。我们使用该假体对114例患者进行了144例初次全髋关节置换术。平均随访时间为4.5 ± 3.4年(范围1 - 13年)。植入的常见原因是髋关节发育不良(52%)和股骨比例较小患者的骨关节炎(22%)。对结果的分析包括对柄下沉和稳定性的评估。
无菌病例的生存率为98.6%;无翻修生存率为97.9%。84例(58%)出现股骨下沉。3个月后没有下沉进展。在出现下沉的病例中,平均下沉距离为2.8 ± 2.0毫米。与持续下沉至12周的柄(3.9 ± 1.6,p = 0.02)相比,在6周前稳定的柄下沉较少(2.2 ± 1.4毫米)。Harris髋关节评分、加州大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)评分和WOMAC评分较术前评估有显著改善(p < 0.001*,p < 0.003*,p ≪ 0.001*);有下沉和无下沉患者的结果没有差异(p = 0.430,p = 0.228,p = 0.147)。
改良瓦格纳锥柄在股骨近端解剖结构具有挑战性的患者中显示出优异的临床效果。下沉轻微,3个月时停止,且不影响临床结果。