Suppr超能文献

分析已知和疑似脓胸成人的抗生素使用与临床结局。

Analysis of antibiotic use and clinical outcomes in adults with known and suspected pleural empyema.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Western Michigan University Homer Stryker MD School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, United States.

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Western Michigan University Homer Stryker MD School of Medicine, Kalamazoo, United States.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Oct 12;22(1):783. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07759-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is not a prevailing consensus on appropriate antibiotic choice, route, and duration in the treatment of bacterial pleural empyema after appropriate source control. Professional society guidelines note the lack of comparative trials with which to guide recommendations. We assessed clinical outcomes in the treatment of known and suspected empyema based upon three aspects of antibiotic use: (1) total duration, (2) duration of intravenous (IV) antibiotics, and (3) duration of anti-anaerobic antibiotics.

METHODS

We performed a hypothesis-generating retrospective chart review analysis of 355 adult inpatients who had pleural drainage, via either chest tube or surgical intervention, for known or suspected empyema. The primary outcome variable was clinician assessment of resolution or lack thereof. The secondary outcomes were death within 90 days, hospital readmission within 30 days for empyema, and all-cause hospital readmission within 30 days. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare outcomes with regard to these variables.

RESULTS

None of the independent variables was significantly associated with a difference in clinical resolution rate despite trends for total antibiotic duration and anti-anaerobic antibiotic duration. None of the independent variables was associated with mortality. Longer total antibiotic duration was associated with lower readmission rate for empyema (median 17 [interquartile range 11-28] antibiotic days in non-readmission group vs. 13 [6-15] days in readmission group), with a non-significant trend for all-cause readmission rate (17 [11-28] days vs. 14 [9-21] days). IV antibiotic duration was not associated with a difference in any of the defined outcomes. Longer duration of anti-anaerobic antibiotics was associated with both lower all-cause readmission (8.5 [0-17] vs. 2 [0-11]) and lower readmission rate for empyema (8 [0-17] vs. 2 [0-3]).

CONCLUSION

Our data support the premise that routine use of anti-anaerobic antibiotics is indicated in the treatment of pleural empyema. However, our study casts doubt on the benefits of extended IV rather than oral antibiotics in the treatment of empyema. This represents a target for future investigation that could potentially limit complications associated with the excessive use of IV antibiotics.

摘要

背景

在适当控制感染源后,对于细菌性脓胸的治疗,在抗生素的选择、使用途径和使用时间方面,尚无普遍共识。专业协会指南指出,缺乏可用于指导建议的对照试验。我们根据抗生素使用的三个方面(1)总疗程,(2)静脉(IV)抗生素疗程,和(3)抗厌氧菌抗生素疗程,评估了已知和疑似脓胸治疗的临床结局。

方法

我们对 355 名成年住院患者进行了假设生成的回顾性图表审查分析,这些患者因已知或疑似脓胸通过胸腔引流管或手术干预进行了治疗。主要结局变量是临床医生对解决或未解决情况的评估。次要结局是 90 天内死亡,30 天内因脓胸再次住院,以及 30 天内全因再次住院。 Mann-Whitney U 检验用于比较这些变量的结果。

结果

尽管总抗生素疗程和抗厌氧菌抗生素疗程有趋势,但独立变量均与临床缓解率无显著差异。独立变量均与死亡率无关。更长的总抗生素疗程与脓胸再入院率较低相关(非再入院组的中位抗生素天数为 17 [11-28]天,再入院组为 13 [6-15]天),全因再入院率呈显著趋势(17 [11-28]天 vs. 14 [9-21]天)。IV 抗生素疗程与任何定义的结局均无差异。抗厌氧菌抗生素疗程较长与全因再入院率(8.5 [0-17] vs. 2 [0-11])和脓胸再入院率(8 [0-17] vs. 2 [0-3])均较低相关。

结论

我们的数据支持常规使用抗厌氧菌抗生素治疗脓胸的前提。然而,我们的研究对延长 IV 而非口服抗生素治疗脓胸的益处提出了质疑。这代表了未来研究的一个目标,可能会限制与过度使用 IV 抗生素相关的并发症。

相似文献

1
Analysis of antibiotic use and clinical outcomes in adults with known and suspected pleural empyema.
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Oct 12;22(1):783. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07759-8.
2
Is video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery the best treatment for paediatric pleural empyema?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011 Jul;13(1):70-6. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2010.254698. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
3
More isn't always better: antibiotic duration after surgical decortication in pleural empyema.
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Jun 30;16(6):3873-3881. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-61. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
5
Management of children with empyema: Pleural drainage is not always necessary.
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2010 May;45(5):475-80. doi: 10.1002/ppul.21200.
6
Surgical versus non-surgical management of pleural empyema.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD001956. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001956.pub2.
8
Surgical versus non-surgical management of pleural empyema.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002(2):CD001956. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001956.
9
Practical management of pleural empyema.
Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2010 Sep;73(3):124-9. doi: 10.4081/monaldi.2010.296.
10
Analysis of Patients Discharged From the Hospital With a Chest Tube in Place.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2018 Apr;105(4):1038-1043. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.10.042. Epub 2018 Feb 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Parapneumonic Effusion and Empyema.
Clin Chest Med. 2021 Dec;42(4):637-647. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2021.08.001.
2
Recent Insights into the Management of Pleural Infection.
Int J Gen Med. 2021 Jul 14;14:3415-3429. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S292705. eCollection 2021.
4
Protocol-driven Antibiotic Treatment of Pediatric Empyema After Fibrinolysis.
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2021 Jan;40(1):44-48. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000002872.
5
Medical and Surgical Management of Empyema.
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Jun;40(3):361-374. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1694699. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
7
The American Association for Thoracic Surgery consensus guidelines for the management of empyema.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Jun;153(6):e129-e146. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.01.030. Epub 2017 Feb 4.
8
Intravenous Versus Oral Antibiotics for Postdischarge Treatment of Complicated Pneumonia.
Pediatrics. 2016 Dec;138(6). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-1692. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
10
Empyema management: A cohort study evaluating antimicrobial therapy.
J Infect. 2016 May;72(5):537-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2016.02.009. Epub 2016 Mar 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验