University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Trials. 2022 Oct 12;23(1):870. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06816-6.
The evidence on what strategies can improve recruitment to clinical trials in maternity care is lacking. As trial recruiters, maternity healthcare professionals (MHCPs) perform behaviours (e.g. talking about trials with potential participants, distributing trial information) they may not ordinarily do outside of the trial. Most trial recruitment interventions do not provide any theoretical basis for the potential effect (on behaviour) or describe if stakeholders were involved during development. The study aim was to use behavioural theory in a co-design process to develop an intervention for MHCPs tasked with approaching all eligible potential participants and inviting them to join a maternity trial and to assess the acceptability and feasibility of such an intervention.
This study applied a step-wise sequential mixed-methods approach. Key stages were informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework and Behaviour Change Techniques (BCT) Taxonomy to map the accounts of MHCPs, with regard to challenges to trial recruitment, to theoretically informed behaviour change strategies. Our recruitment intervention was co-designed during workshops with MHCPs and maternity service users. Acceptability and feasibility of our intervention was assessed using an online questionnaire based on the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) and involved a range of trial stakeholders.
Two co-design workshops, with a total of nine participants (n = 7 MHCP, n = 2 maternity service users), discussed thirteen BCTs as potential solutions. Ten BCTs, broadly covering Consequences and Reframing, progressed to intervention development. Forty-five trial stakeholders (clinical midwives, research midwives/nurses, doctors, allied health professionals and trial team members) participated in the online TFA questionnaire. The intervention was perceived effective, coherent, and not burdensome to engage with. Core areas for future refinement included Anticipated opportunity and Self-efficacy.
We developed a behaviour change recruitment intervention which is based on the accounts of MHCP trial recruiters and developed in a co-design process. Overall, the intervention was deemed acceptable. Future evaluation of the intervention will establish its effectiveness in enabling MHCPs to invite all eligible people to participate in a maternity care trial, and determine whether this translates into an increase in maternity trial recruitment rates.
关于哪些策略可以提高产妇保健临床试验的招募效果,目前证据不足。作为试验招募人员,产妇保健医护人员(MHCPs)会在试验之外采取一些行为(例如与潜在参与者讨论试验,分发试验信息)。大多数试验招募干预措施没有提供任何关于潜在效果(对行为的影响)的理论依据,也没有说明在开发过程中是否涉及利益相关者。本研究旨在使用行为理论,通过共同设计过程为负责接触所有符合条件的潜在参与者并邀请他们参加产妇试验的 MHCPs 开发一种干预措施,并评估这种干预措施的可接受性和可行性。
本研究采用逐步顺序混合方法。关键阶段由理论领域框架和行为改变技术(BCT)分类法告知,以将 MHCPs 对试验招募挑战的描述映射到理论上的行为改变策略。我们的招募干预措施是在与 MHCPs 和产妇服务用户的研讨会上共同设计的。我们的干预措施的可接受性和可行性是通过基于可接受性理论框架(TFA)的在线问卷评估的,涉及一系列试验利益相关者。
共进行了两次设计研讨会,共有九名参与者(n=7 名 MHCP,n=2 名产妇服务用户)讨论了 13 个 BCT 作为潜在解决方案。十个 BCT,广泛涵盖后果和重新构建,进入了干预措施的开发阶段。45 名试验利益相关者(临床助产士、研究助产士/护士、医生、辅助医疗专业人员和试验团队成员)参加了在线 TFA 问卷。该干预措施被认为是有效的、一致的,并且不会增加参与的负担。未来需要进一步改进的核心领域包括预期机会和自我效能。
我们开发了一种基于 MHCP 试验招募人员的说法并在共同设计过程中开发的行为改变招募干预措施。总体而言,该干预措施被认为是可以接受的。未来对干预措施的评估将确定其在使 MHCP 能够邀请所有符合条件的人参与产妇保健试验方面的有效性,并确定这是否会转化为增加产妇试验招募率。