• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制定解决同意讨论中保留沟通差异的策略:行为干预的发展。

Developing strategies to address disparities in retention communication during the consent discussion: development of a behavioural intervention.

机构信息

Health Services Research Unit, Health Sciences Building, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.

Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2023 Apr 26;24(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07268-2.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-023-07268-2
PMID:37101245
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10134580/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials are essential to evidence-based medicine. Their success relies on recruitment and retention of participants: problems with either can affect validity of results. Past research on improving trials has focused on recruitment, with less on retention, and even less considering retention at the point of recruitment, i.e., what retention-relevant information is shared during consent processes. The behaviour of trial staff communicating this information during consent is likely to contribute to retention. So, developing approaches to mitigate issues in retention at the point of consent is necessary. In this study, we describe the development of a behavioural intervention targeting the communication of information important to retention during the consent process.

METHODS

We applied the Theoretical Domains Framework and Behaviour Change Wheel to develop an intervention aimed at changing the retention communication behaviours of trial staff. Building on findings from an interview study to understand the barriers/facilitators to retention communication during consent, we identified behaviour change techniques that could moderate them. These techniques were grouped into potential intervention categories and presented to a co-design group of trial staff and public partners to discuss how they might be packaged into an intervention. An intervention was presented to these same stakeholders and assessed for acceptability through a survey based on the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability.

RESULTS

Twenty-six behaviour change techniques were identified with potential to change communication of retention-information at consent. Six trial stakeholders in the co-design group discussed means for implementing these techniques and agreed the available techniques could be most effective within a series of meetings focussed on best practices for communicating retention at consent. The proposed intervention was deemed acceptable through survey results.

CONCLUSION

We have developed an intervention aimed at facilitating the communication of retention at informed consent through a behavioural approach. This intervention will be delivered to trial staff and will add to the available strategies for trials to improve retention.

摘要

背景

临床试验对于循证医学至关重要。其成功依赖于参与者的招募和保留:任何一方的问题都可能影响结果的有效性。过去关于提高试验的研究重点是招募,而保留方面的研究较少,甚至更少考虑在招募时的保留,即,在同意过程中共享哪些与保留相关的信息。试验工作人员在同意过程中传达这些信息的行为可能会影响保留率。因此,有必要开发在同意时减轻保留问题的方法。在这项研究中,我们描述了一种行为干预措施的开发,该措施旨在改变同意过程中与保留相关的信息的沟通。

方法

我们应用理论领域框架和行为改变轮来制定一项干预措施,旨在改变试验工作人员在同意过程中保留沟通的行为。在对访谈研究的结果进行分析以了解同意过程中保留沟通的障碍/促进因素的基础上,我们确定了可以调节这些因素的行为改变技术。这些技术被分为潜在的干预类别,并呈现给一个由试验工作人员和公众合作伙伴组成的共同设计小组,以讨论如何将它们纳入干预措施中。同一批利益相关者也对干预措施进行了评估,并根据可接受性的理论框架进行了基于调查的评估。

结果

确定了 26 种行为改变技术,这些技术有可能改变同意时保留信息的沟通。在共同设计小组中有六名试验利益相关者讨论了实施这些技术的方法,并同意可用技术在一系列会议中最有效,这些会议侧重于在同意时保留沟通的最佳实践。通过调查结果,拟议的干预措施被认为是可以接受的。

结论

我们已经开发了一种通过行为方法来促进知情同意时保留信息沟通的干预措施。该干预措施将提供给试验工作人员,并为试验提高保留率提供更多策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa37/10134580/2d89d59b1539/13063_2023_7268_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa37/10134580/7fdca16a39fc/13063_2023_7268_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa37/10134580/2d89d59b1539/13063_2023_7268_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa37/10134580/7fdca16a39fc/13063_2023_7268_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa37/10134580/2d89d59b1539/13063_2023_7268_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing strategies to address disparities in retention communication during the consent discussion: development of a behavioural intervention.制定解决同意讨论中保留沟通差异的策略:行为干预的发展。
Trials. 2023 Apr 26;24(1):296. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07268-2.
2
What influences communication about retention in randomised trials: a multi-trial, theory-based analysis exploring trial staff perspectives.影响随机试验保留率沟通的因素:一项基于多试验理论的分析,探讨试验人员的观点。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Aug 25;22(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01708-4.
3
The development of theory-informed participant-centred interventions to maximise participant retention in randomised controlled trials.制定基于理论的以参与者为中心的干预措施,以最大限度地提高随机对照试验中参与者的保留率。
Trials. 2022 Apr 8;23(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06218-8.
4
Development of a co-designed behaviour change intervention aimed at healthcare professionals recruiting to clinical trials in maternity care.旨在为产妇保健临床试验招募医护人员的合作设计行为改变干预措施的制定。
Trials. 2022 Oct 12;23(1):870. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06816-6.
5
Development and evaluation of a de-escalation training intervention in adult acute and forensic units: the EDITION systematic review and feasibility trial.成人急症和法医病房中降级治疗培训干预措施的制定和评估:EDITION 系统评价和可行性试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jan;28(3):1-120. doi: 10.3310/FGGW6874.
6
Behavioural optimisation to address trial conduct challenges: case study in the UK-REBOA trial.行为优化以应对试验实施挑战:英国 UK-REBOA 试验案例研究。
Trials. 2022 May 12;23(1):398. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06341-6.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Preoperative behavioural intervention to reduce drinking before elective orthopaedic surgery: the PRE-OP BIRDS feasibility RCT.择期骨科手术前行为干预以减少饮酒:PRE-OP BIRDS 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Mar;24(12):1-176. doi: 10.3310/hta24120.
9
Delivering an iterative Communication Partner Training programme to multidisciplinary healthcare professionals: A pilot implementation study and process evaluation.为多学科医疗保健专业人员提供迭代沟通伙伴培训计划:试点实施研究和过程评估。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2021 May;56(3):620-636. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12618. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
10
Systematic Techniques to Enhance rEtention in Randomised controlled trials: the STEER study protocol.提高随机对照试验中保留率的系统技术:STEER研究方案
Trials. 2018 Mar 27;19(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2572-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Multilevel challenges to equitable inclusion of children in trials when parents use languages other than English: A qualitative report from Children's Oncology Group's Diversity and Health Disparities Committee Language Equity Working Group.当父母使用英语以外的语言时,儿童公平参与试验面临的多层次挑战:儿童肿瘤学组多样性与健康差异委员会语言公平工作组的定性报告
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2024 Nov;71(11):e31321. doi: 10.1002/pbc.31321. Epub 2024 Sep 5.

本文引用的文献

1
What influences communication about retention in randomised trials: a multi-trial, theory-based analysis exploring trial staff perspectives.影响随机试验保留率沟通的因素:一项基于多试验理论的分析,探讨试验人员的观点。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Aug 25;22(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01708-4.
2
Behavioural approaches to recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a systematic mapping review.行为学方法在临床试验招募和保留中的应用:系统综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 9;12(3):e054854. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054854.
3
Development of a theory-informed questionnaire to assess the acceptability of healthcare interventions.
理论导向型问卷评估医疗干预措施可接受性的开发。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 1;22(1):279. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07577-3.
4
Theory-guided interviews identified behavioral barriers and enablers to healthcare professionals recruiting participants to maternity trials.理论指导的访谈确定了医疗保健专业人员在招募产妇试验参与者方面的行为障碍和促进因素。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 May;145:81-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.01.015. Epub 2022 Jan 23.
5
A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance.制定和评估复杂干预措施的新框架:对医学研究理事会指南的更新。
BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2061.
6
Why trials lose participants: A multitrial investigation of participants' perspectives using the theoretical domains framework.为什么试验会失去参与者:使用理论领域框架对参与者观点进行的多试验研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Sep;137:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.007. Epub 2021 Mar 13.
7
Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials.提高随机试验中保留率的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 6;3(3):MR000032. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000032.pub3.
8
Development of an online tool for linking behavior change techniques and mechanisms of action based on triangulation of findings from literature synthesis and expert consensus.基于文献综合和专家共识研究结果的三角测量,开发一种将行为改变技术与作用机制相联系的在线工具。
Transl Behav Med. 2021 May 25;11(5):1049-1065. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa050.
9
An embedded mixed-methods study highlighted a lack of discussions on retention in clinical trial consultations.一项嵌入式混合方法研究强调了在临床试验咨询中缺乏关于保留问题的讨论。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;123:49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.011. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
10
Lupus patient decisions about clinical trial participation: a qualitative evaluation of perceptions, facilitators and barriers.狼疮患者参与临床试验的决策:对认知、促进因素和障碍的定性评估。
Lupus Sci Med. 2020 Mar 15;7(1):e000360. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2019-000360. eCollection 2020.