The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2022 Jul;2022(212):1-91.
Mortality is associated with long-term exposure to fine particulate matter (particulate matter ≤2.5 μm in aerodynamic diameter; PM), although the magnitude and form of these associations remain poorly understood at lower concentrations. Knowledge gaps include the shape of concentration-response curves and the lowest levels of exposure at which increased risks are evident and the occurrence and extent of associations with specific causes of death. Here, we applied improved estimates of exposure to ambient PM to national population-based cohorts in Canada, including a stacked cohort of 7.1 million people who responded to census year 1991, 1996, or 2001. The characterization of the shape of the concentration-response relationship for nonaccidental mortality and several specific causes of death at low levels of exposure was the focus of the Mortality-Air Pollution Associations in Low Exposure Environments (MAPLE) Phase 1 report. In the Phase 1 report we reported that associations between outdoor PM concentrations and nonaccidental mortality were attenuated with the addition of ozone (O) or a measure of gaseous pollutant oxidant capacity (O), which was estimated from O and nitrogen dioxide (NO) concentrations. This was motivated by our interests in understanding both the effects air pollutant mixtures may have on mortality and also the role of O as a copollutant that shares common sources and precursor emissions with those of PM. In this Phase 2 report, we further explore the sensitivity of these associations with O and O, evaluate sensitivity to other factors, such as regional variation, and present ambient PM concentration-response relationships for specific causes of death.
PM concentrations were estimated at 1 km spatial resolution across North America using remote sensing of aerosol optical depth (AOD) combined with chemical transport model (GEOS-Chem) simulations of the AOD:surface PM mass concentration relationship, land use information, and ground monitoring. These estimates were informed and further refined with collocated measurements of PM and AOD, including targeted measurements in areas of low PM concentrations collected at five locations across Canada. Ground measurements of PM and total suspended particulate matter (TSP) mass concentrations from 1981 to 1999 were used to backcast remote-sensing-based estimates over that same time period, resulting in modeled annual surfaces from 1981 to 2016.
Annual exposures to PM were then estimated for subjects in several national population-based Canadian cohorts using residential histories derived from annual postal code entries in income tax files. These cohorts included three census-based cohorts: the 1991 Canadian Census Health and Environment Cohort (CanCHEC; 2.5 million respondents), the 1996 CanCHEC (3 million respondents), the 2001 CanCHEC (3 million respondents), and a Stacked CanCHEC where duplicate records of respondents were excluded (Stacked CanCHEC; 7.1 million respondents). The Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) mortality cohort (mCCHS), derived from several pooled cycles of the CCHS (540,900 respondents), included additional individual information about health behaviors. Follow-up periods were completed to the end of 2016 for all cohorts. Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated for nonaccidental and other major causes of death using a 10-year moving average exposure and 1-year lag. All models were stratified by age, sex, immigrant status, and where appropriate, census year or survey cycle. Models were further adjusted for income adequacy quintile, visible minority status, Indigenous identity, educational attainment, labor-force status, marital status, occupation, and ecological covariates of community size, airshed, urban form, and four dimensions of the Canadian Marginalization Index (Can-Marg; instability, deprivation, dependency, and ethnic concentration). The mCCHS analyses were also adjusted for individual-level measures of smoking, alcohol consumption, fruit and vegetable consumption, body mass index (BMI), and exercise behavior.
In addition to linear models, the shape of the concentration-response function was investigated using restricted cubic splines (RCS). The number of knots were selected by minimizing the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). Two additional models were used to examine the association between nonaccidental mortality and PM. The first is the standard threshold model defined by a transformation of concentration equaling zero if the concentration was less than a specific threshold value and concentration minus the threshold value for concentrations above the threshold. The second additional model was an extension of the Shape Constrained Health Impact Function (SCHIF), the eSCHIF, which converts RCS predictions into functions potentially more suitable for use in health impact assessments. Given the RCS parameter estimates and their covariance matrix, 1,000 realizations of the RCS were simulated at concentrations from the minimum to the maximum concentration, by increments of 0.1 μg/m. An eSCHIF was then fit to each of these RCS realizations. Thus, 1,000 eSCHIF predictions and uncertainty intervals were determined at each concentration within the total range.
Sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine associations between PM and mortality when in the presence of, or stratified by tertile of, O or O. Additionally, associations between PM and mortality were assessed for sensitivity to lower concentration thresholds, where person-years below a threshold value were assigned the mean exposure within that group. We also examined the sensitivity of the shape of the nonaccidental mortality-PM association to removal of person-years at or above 12 μg/m (the current U.S. National Ambient Air Quality Standard) and 10 μg/m (the current Canadian and former [2005] World Health Organization [WHO] guideline, and current WHO Interim Target-4). Finally, differences in the shapes of PM-mortality associations were assessed across broad geographic regions (airsheds) within Canada.
The refined PM exposure estimates demonstrated improved performance relative to estimates applied previously and in the MAPLE Phase 1 report, with slightly reduced errors, including at lower ranges of concentrations (e.g., for PM <10 μg/m).
Positive associations between outdoor PM concentrations and nonaccidental mortality were consistently observed in all cohorts. In the Stacked CanCHEC analyses (1.3 million deaths), each 10-μg/m increase in outdoor PM concentration corresponded to an HR of 1.084 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.073 to 1.096) for nonaccidental mortality. For an interquartile range (IQR) increase in PM mass concentration of 4.16 μg/m and for a mean annual nonaccidental death rate of 92.8 per 10,000 persons (over the 1991-2016 period for cohort participants ages 25-90), this HR corresponds to an additional 31.62 deaths per 100,000 people, which is equivalent to an additional 7,848 deaths per year in Canada, based on the 2016 population. In RCS models, mean HR predictions increased from the minimum concentration of 2.5 μg/m to 4.5 μg/m, flattened from 4.5 μg/m to 8.0 μg/m, then increased for concentrations above 8.0 μg/m. The threshold model results reflected this pattern with -2 log-likelihood values being equal at 2.5 μg/m and 8.0 μg/m. However, mean threshold model predictions monotonically increased over the concentration range with the lower 95% CI equal to one from 2.5 μg/m to 8.0 μg/m. The RCS model was a superior predictor compared with any of the threshold models, including the linear model.
In the mCCHS cohort analyses inclusion of behavioral covariates did not substantially change the results for both linear and nonlinear models. We examined the sensitivity of the shape of the nonaccidental mortality-PM association to removal of person-years at or above the current U.S. and Canadian standards of 12 μg/m and 10 μg/m, respectively. In the full cohort and in both restricted cohorts, a steep increase was observed from the minimum concentration of 2.5 μg/m to 5 μg/m. For the full cohort and the <12 μg/m cohort the relationship flattened over the 5 to 9 μg/m range and then increased above 9 μg/m. A similar increase was observed for the <10 μg/m cohort followed by a clear decline in the magnitude of predictions over the 5 to 9 μg/m range and an increase above 9 μg/m. Together these results suggest that a positive association exists for concentrations >9 μg/m with indications of adverse effects on mortality at concentrations as low as 2.5 μg/m.
Among the other causes of death examined, PM exposures were consistently associated with an increased hazard of mortality due to ischemic heart disease, respiratory disease, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes across all cohorts. Associations were observed in the Stacked CanCHEC but not in all other cohorts for cerebrovascular disease, pneumonia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) mortality. No significant associations were observed between mortality and exposure to PM for heart failure, lung cancer, and kidney failure.
In sensitivity analyses, the addition of O and O attenuated associations between PM and mortality. When analyses were stratified by tertiles of copollutants, associations between PM and mortality were only observed in the highest tertile of O or O. Across broad regions of Canada, linear HR estimates and the shape of the eSCHIF varied substantially, possibly reflecting underlying differences in air pollutant mixtures not characterized by PM mass concentrations or the included gaseous pollutants. Sensitivity analyses to assess regional variation in population characteristics and access to healthcare indicated that the observed regional differences in concentration-mortality relationships, specifically the flattening of the concentration-mortality relationship over the 5 to 9 μg/m range, was not likely related to variation in the makeup of the cohort or its access to healthcare, lending support to the potential role of spatially varying air pollutant mixtures not sufficiently characterized by PM mass concentrations.
In several large, national Canadian cohorts, including a cohort of 7.1 million unique census respondents, associations were observed between exposure to PM with nonaccidental mortality and several specific causes of death. Associations with nonaccidental mortality were observed using the eSCHIF methodology at concentrations as low as 2.5 μg/m, and there was no clear evidence in the observed data of a lower threshold, below which PM was not associated with nonaccidental mortality.
长期暴露于细颗粒物(粒径≤2.5 μm 的颗粒物;PM)与死亡率有关,尽管在较低浓度下,这些关联的程度和形式仍知之甚少。知识空白包括浓度-反应曲线的形状以及明显增加风险的最低暴露水平,以及与特定死因的关联的发生和程度。在这里,我们应用了改进的环境中细颗粒物浓度的暴露估计值,包括加拿大基于人群的七个队列,其中包括 1991 年、1996 年或 2001 年响应人口普查年的 710 万人的堆叠队列。在低暴露环境中空气质量污染物关联的死亡率-空气污染(MAPLE)阶段 1 报告中,重点研究了低水平暴露下非意外死亡率和几种特定死因的浓度-反应关系的形状。在阶段 1 报告中,我们报告说,当添加臭氧(O)或衡量气态污染物氧化剂能力(O)时,户外 PM 浓度与非意外死亡率之间的关联减弱,O 和二氧化氮(NO)浓度。这是因为我们对了解空气污染物混合物可能对死亡率产生的影响以及 O 作为与 PM 具有共同来源和前体排放的污染物的作用感兴趣。在本阶段 2 报告中,我们进一步探讨了 O 和 O 对这些关联的敏感性,评估了其他因素(如区域差异)的敏感性,并为特定死因的死亡率呈现了特定的 PM 浓度-反应关系。
使用 1 公里空间分辨率的气溶胶光学深度(AOD)遥感与化学输送模型(GEOS-Chem)模拟的 AOD:地表 PM 质量浓度关系、土地利用信息和地面监测相结合,在北美各地估算 PM 浓度。这些估计数还通过在加拿大五个地点进行的 PM 和 AOD 的针对性测量得到了补充,这些测量是在低 PM 浓度的时间段内进行的。1981 年至 1999 年的地面 PM 和总悬浮颗粒物(TSP)质量浓度测量值用于在同一时间段内回溯遥感估算值,从而生成了 1981 年至 2016 年的建模年表。
然后,使用从所得税档案中每年的邮政编码条目派生的居住历史,为几个加拿大全国性人群队列中的几位 subjects 估算了 PM 的年暴露量。这些队列包括三个基于人口普查的队列:1991 年加拿大人口普查健康与环境队列(CanCHEC;250 万受访者)、1996 年 CanCHEC(300 万受访者)和 2001 年 CanCHEC(300 万受访者),以及排除重复受访者记录的堆叠 CanCHEC(710 万受访者)。加拿大社区健康调查(CCHS)死亡率队列(mCCHS),源自 CCHS 的几个综合周期(540,900 名受访者),包含有关健康行为的其他个人信息。对于所有队列,完成了截至 2016 年的随访期。使用 10 年移动平均暴露量和 1 年滞后时间,使用 Cox 比例风险比(HR)估计非意外和其他主要死因的 HR。所有模型均按年龄、性别、移民身份以及适当的情况,按普查年或调查周期进行分层。模型进一步根据收入充足性五分位数、少数族裔身份、原住民身份、教育程度、劳动力状况、婚姻状况、职业以及社区规模、大气流域、城市形态和加拿大边缘化指数(Can-Marg;不稳定性、贫困、依赖性和族裔集中)的四个维度进行调整。mCCHS 分析还调整了个体水平的吸烟、饮酒、水果和蔬菜摄入、体重指数(BMI)和运动行为的措施。
除了线性模型外,还使用限制立方样条(RCS)研究了浓度-反应函数的形状。结点的数量通过最小化贝叶斯信息准则(BIC)来选择。还使用了另外两个模型来检查非意外死亡率与 PM 之间的关联。第一个是标准阈值模型,定义为浓度等于零的转换,如果浓度低于特定阈值,则浓度减去浓度与阈值以上的浓度之差。第二个附加模型是形状受限健康影响函数(SCHIF)的扩展,即 eSCHIF,它将 RCS 预测转换为可能更适合健康影响评估的函数。考虑到 RCS 参数估计及其协方差矩阵,通过以 0.1 μg/m 的增量从最低浓度到最高浓度对 RCS 进行了 1,000 次模拟。然后对每个 RCS 实现拟合了一个 eSCHIF。因此,在每个浓度范围内确定了 1,000 个 eSCHIF 预测值和不确定性区间。
进行了敏感性分析,以检查存在 O 或 O 时,或在其三分位数分层时,PM 与死亡率之间的关联。此外,还评估了较低浓度阈值下 PM 与死亡率的关联敏感性,其中低于阈值值的人年被分配给该组内的平均暴露值。我们还检查了非意外死亡率-PM 关联的形状对删除 12 μg/m(美国国家空气质量标准)和 10 μg/m(加拿大和前(2005 年)世界卫生组织 [WHO] 指南以及当前的 WHO 临时目标-4)范围内或以上的人年的敏感性。最后,还评估了加拿大广阔地理区域(大气流域)内 PM-死亡率关联的形状差异。
经过改进的 PM 暴露估计值与以前和 MAPLE 阶段 1 报告中的估计值相比,表现出了更好的性能,错误略有减少,包括在较低的浓度范围内(例如,PM <10 μg/m)。
在所有队列中,都观察到室外 PM 浓度与非意外死亡率之间存在正相关关系。在堆叠的 CanCHEC 分析(130 万人死亡)中,每增加 10μg/m 的室外 PM 浓度,非意外死亡率的 HR 为 1.084(95%置信区间 [CI]:1.073 至 1.096)。对于 PM 质量浓度的四分位距(IQR)增加 4.16μg/m 和非意外死亡率的 1991-2016 年期间年龄在 25-90 岁的队列参与者的平均每年 92.8 人/10,000 人,这对应于每年每 100,000 人额外增加 31.62 人死亡,这相当于加拿大每年额外死亡 7848 人,基于 2016 年的人口。在 RCS 模型中,平均 HR 预测值从最低浓度 2.5μg/m 增加到 4.5μg/m,从 4.5μg/m 到 8.0μg/m 趋于平坦,然后在 8.0μg/m 以上的浓度增加。阈值模型的结果反映了这种模式,在 2.5μg/m 和 8.0μg/m 处的-2 对数似然值相等。然而,随着从 2.5μg/m 到 8.0μg/m 的浓度增加,平均阈值模型预测值单调增加,95%CI 下限从 2.5μg/m 到 8.0μg/m 等于 1。RCS 模型是优于任何阈值模型的预测器,包括线性模型。
在 mCCHS 队列分析中,包括行为因素不会大大改变线性和非线性模型的结果。我们检查了非意外死亡率-PM 关联的形状对删除当前美国和加拿大标准 12μg/m 和 10μg/m 以上的人的年的敏感性。在整个队列和两个受限队列中,从最低浓度 2.5μg/m 到 5μg/m 观察到陡峭增加。对于整个队列和<12μg/m 队列,在 5 到 9μg/m 范围内的关系趋于平坦,然后在