School of Journalism and Media, The University of Texas at Austin.
Health Commun. 2023 Dec;38(14):3091-3101. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2022.2134703. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
As conspiracy theories around COVID-19 pose a big global challenge to public health and well-being, this study seeks to identify how and when people are likely to activate conspiratorial thinking and believe in conspiracy theories about the coronavirus. Based on a U.S. national two-wave survey (W1: = 1,119; W2: = 543), this study found partial support for direct effects of uncertainty on conspiratorial thinking and support for indirect effects through threat perception. We also found some evidence of direct effects of uncertainty on conspiracy beliefs and indirect effects through threat perception and serially mediated through threat perception and negative emotions. Findings suggest that effects - either direct or indirect - of uncertainty on conspiratorial thinking/conspiracy beliefs are moderated by perceived relevance to COVID-19, personal experience of the disease, and social media use. Theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.
随着围绕 COVID-19 的阴谋论对全球公共卫生和福祉构成重大挑战,本研究旨在确定人们何时何地可能会激活阴谋思维并相信有关冠状病毒的阴谋论。本研究基于美国的一项全国两波调查(W1:=1119;W2:=543),发现不确定性对阴谋思维的直接影响和通过威胁感知的间接影响有一定的支持。我们还发现了一些不确定性对阴谋信念的直接影响以及通过威胁感知和通过威胁感知和负面情绪串联的间接影响的证据。研究结果表明,不确定性对阴谋思维/阴谋信念的影响(无论是直接的还是间接的)都受到与 COVID-19 的相关性、对疾病的个人体验以及社交媒体使用的调节。讨论了这些发现的理论和实践意义。