• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项用于预测未经选择的急诊患者死亡率的简单评分的验证。

Validation of a Simple Score for Mortality Prediction in a Cohort of Unselected Emergency Patients.

机构信息

Emergency Department, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Hospital of South West Jutland, Esbjerg, Denmark.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pract. 2022 Sep 23;2022:7281693. doi: 10.1155/2022/7281693. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1155/2022/7281693
PMID:36225535
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9525775/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prognostication is an important component of medical decision-making. A patients' general prognosis can be difficult to measure. The Simple Prognostic Score (SPS) was designed to include patients' age, mobility, aggregated vital signs, and the treating physician's decision to admit to aid prognostication. . Our study aim is to validate the SPS, compare it with the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) regarding its prognostic performance, and test the interrater reliability of the subjective variable of the decision to admit.

METHODS

Over a period of 9 weeks all patients presenting to the ED were included, routinely interviewed, final disposition registered, and followed up for one year. The C-statistics of discrimination was used to compare SPS and ESI predictions of 7-day, 30-day, and 1-year mortality. Youden J Statistics and Odds ratio, using logistical regression, were calculated for the Simple Prognostic Score. In a subset, a chart review was performed by senior physicians for a secondary assessment of the decision to admit. Interrater reliability was calculated using percentages and Cohens Kappa.

RESULTS

Out of 5648 patients, 3272 (57.9%) had a low SPS (i.e., ≤ 1); none of these patients died within 7 days, 2 (0.1%) died within 30 days after presentation and 19 (0.6%) died within a year. The area under the curve for 1-year mortality of the Simple Prognostic Score was 0.848. Secondary analysis of the interrater agreement for the decision to admit was 92%.

CONCLUSION

In a prospective study of unselected ED patients, the Simple Prognostic Score was validated as a reliable predictor of short- and long-term mortality.

摘要

背景

预后是医疗决策的重要组成部分。患者的总体预后难以衡量。简单预后评分(SPS)旨在纳入患者的年龄、活动能力、综合生命体征以及治疗医生决定收治以辅助预后评估。我们的研究目的是验证 SPS,比较其与紧急严重指数(ESI)在预后性能方面的差异,并测试收治决定这一主观变量的组间可靠性。

方法

在 9 周的时间内,纳入所有到急诊科就诊的患者,常规进行访谈,记录最终去向,并进行为期 1 年的随访。使用判别能力的 C 统计量比较 SPS 和 ESI 对 7 天、30 天和 1 年死亡率的预测。使用逻辑回归计算简单预后评分的约登指数和优势比。在一个亚组中,由资深医生进行图表回顾,以对收治决定进行二次评估。使用百分比和 Cohen's Kappa 计算组间可靠性。

结果

在 5648 名患者中,3272 名(57.9%)SPS 较低(即≤1);这些患者中无 7 天内死亡者,2 名(0.1%)在就诊后 30 天内死亡,19 名(0.6%)在 1 年内死亡。简单预后评分的 1 年死亡率的曲线下面积为 0.848。收治决定的组间一致性的二次分析为 92%。

结论

在一项对急诊科未选择患者的前瞻性研究中,简单预后评分被验证为短期和长期死亡率的可靠预测指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a54/9525775/4efddcf006c9/IJCLP2022-7281693.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a54/9525775/2c5ee01c2b4e/IJCLP2022-7281693.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a54/9525775/0f5ac43ccbd4/IJCLP2022-7281693.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a54/9525775/4efddcf006c9/IJCLP2022-7281693.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a54/9525775/2c5ee01c2b4e/IJCLP2022-7281693.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a54/9525775/0f5ac43ccbd4/IJCLP2022-7281693.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a54/9525775/4efddcf006c9/IJCLP2022-7281693.003.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of a Simple Score for Mortality Prediction in a Cohort of Unselected Emergency Patients.一项用于预测未经选择的急诊患者死亡率的简单评分的验证。
Int J Clin Pract. 2022 Sep 23;2022:7281693. doi: 10.1155/2022/7281693. eCollection 2022.
2
A simple prognostic score predicts one-year mortality of alert and calm emergency department patients: A prospective two-center observational study.一种简单的预后评分可预测警觉和镇静的急诊科患者的一年死亡率:一项前瞻性的两中心观察研究。
Int J Clin Pract. 2020 May;74(5):e13481. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13481. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
3
Emergency Severity Index version 4: a valid and reliable tool in pediatric emergency department triage.急诊严重程度指数第4版:儿科急诊科分诊中有效且可靠的工具。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Aug;28(8):753-7. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e3182621813.
4
Assessing Severity of Illness in Patients Transported to Hospital by Paramedics: External Validation of 3 Prognostic Scores.评估急救人员送往医院的患者的疾病严重程度:3 个预后评分的外部验证。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2020 Mar-Apr;24(2):273-281. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2019.1632998. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
5
A new simplified model for predicting 30-day mortality in older medical emergency department patients: The rise up score.一种用于预测老年医学急诊患者 30 天死亡率的新简化模型:Rise up 评分。
Eur J Intern Med. 2020 Jul;77:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2020.02.021. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
6
Predictive score for mortality in patients with COPD exacerbations attending hospital emergency departments.医院急诊科收治的慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重患者的死亡预测评分
BMC Med. 2014 Apr 23;12:66. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-66.
7
Development and validation of the VitaL CLASS score to predict mortality in stage IV solid cancer patients with septic shock in the emergency department: a multi-center, prospective cohort study.开发并验证 VitaL CLASS 评分,以预测急诊科 IV 期实体瘤合并感染性休克患者的死亡率:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Med. 2020 Dec 14;18(1):390. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01875-5.
8
The SPEED (sepsis patient evaluation in the emergency department) score: a risk stratification and outcome prediction tool.SPEED(急诊科脓毒症患者评估)评分:一种风险分层和结局预测工具。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2017 Jun;24(3):170-175. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000344.
9
Stress markers predict mortality in patients with nonspecific complaints presenting to the emergency department and may be a useful risk stratification tool to support disposition planning.应激标志物可预测因非特异性症状就诊于急诊科的患者的死亡率,并且可能是一种有用的风险分层工具,以支持处置计划。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Jul;20(7):670-9. doi: 10.1111/acem.12172.
10
The REDS score: a new scoring system to risk-stratify emergency department suspected sepsis: a derivation and validation study.REDS 评分:一种用于风险分层急诊科疑似脓毒症的新评分系统:一项推导和验证研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 26;9(8):e030922. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030922.

引用本文的文献

1
In-Hospital Mortality Prediction Model for Critically Ill Older Adult Patients Transferred from the Emergency Department to the Intensive Care Unit.从急诊科转入重症监护病房的老年危重症患者的院内死亡率预测模型
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2023 Nov 22;16:2555-2563. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S442138. eCollection 2023.
2
A fast emergency department triage score based on mobility, mental status and oxygen saturation compared with the emergency severity index: a prospective cohort study.一项基于活动能力、精神状态和血氧饱和度的快速急诊科分诊评分与急诊严重程度指数的比较:一项前瞻性队列研究。
QJM. 2023 Oct 6;116(9):774-780. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcad160.

本文引用的文献

1
The clinical frailty scale predicts 1-year mortality in emergency department patients aged 65 years and older.临床虚弱量表可预测 65 岁及以上急诊科患者 1 年的死亡率。
Acad Emerg Med. 2022 May;29(5):572-580. doi: 10.1111/acem.14460. Epub 2022 Apr 23.
2
Emergency hospital admissions among older adults living alone in the community.独居老年人的急诊住院情况。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Nov 3;21(1):1192. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07216-3.
3
Understanding what matters most to patients in acute care in seven countries, using the flash mob study design.
了解七个国家急性护理中患者最关注的问题,采用快闪族研究设计。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 19;21(1):474. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06459-4.
4
Emergency department management of older people living with frailty: a guide for emergency practitioners.老年人虚弱症的急诊科管理:急诊医生指南。
Emerg Med J. 2021 Sep;38(9):724-729. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2020-210014. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
5
Discharge against medical advice from the emergency department in a university hospital.急诊科患者未经医嘱离院:某大学附属医院的一项研究
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Mar 16;21(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00422-6.
6
Patient-reported outcome and experience measures in geriatric emergency medicine.老年急诊医学中患者报告的结局和体验指标
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2021 Mar;54(2):122-124. doi: 10.1007/s00391-020-01777-4. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
7
Rapid Emergency Medicine Score-Reinventing Prognostication in Emergency Care.快速急诊医学评分——重塑急诊护理中的预后评估
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020 Jun;24(6):378-379. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23467.
8
Physicians' Disease Severity Ratings are Non-Inferior to the Emergency Severity Index.医生的疾病严重程度评级不劣于急诊严重程度指数。
J Clin Med. 2020 Mar 11;9(3):762. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030762.
9
A simple prognostic score predicts one-year mortality of alert and calm emergency department patients: A prospective two-center observational study.一种简单的预后评分可预测警觉和镇静的急诊科患者的一年死亡率:一项前瞻性的两中心观察研究。
Int J Clin Pract. 2020 May;74(5):e13481. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.13481. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
10
The last decade of symptom-oriented research in emergency medicine: triage, work-up, and disposition.过去十年以症状为导向的急诊医学研究:分诊、检查和处置。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2019 Oct 27;149:w20141. doi: 10.4414/smw.2019.20141. eCollection 2019 Oct 7.