Quantitative Sustainability Assessment, Department of Environmental and Resource Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Produktionstorvet 424, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Quantitative Sustainability Assessment, Department of Environmental and Resource Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Produktionstorvet 424, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Chemosphere. 2023 Jan;310:136807. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136807. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
Chemicals emitted to the environment affect ecosystem health from local to global scale, and reducing chemical impacts has become an important element of European and global sustainability efforts. The present work advances ecotoxicity characterization of chemicals in life cycle impact assessment by proposing recommendations resulting from international expert workshops and work conducted under the umbrella of the UNEP-SETAC Life Cycle Initiative in the GLAM project (Global guidance on environmental life cycle impact assessment indicators). We include specific recommendations for broadening the assessment scope through proposing to introduce additional environmental compartments beyond freshwater and related ecotoxicity indicators, as well as for adapting the ecotoxicity effect modelling approach to better reflect environmentally relevant exposure levels and including to a larger extent chronic test data. As result, we (1) propose a consistent mathematical framework for calculating freshwater ecotoxicity characterization factors and their underlying fate, exposure and effect parameters; (2) implement the framework into the USEtox scientific consensus model; (3) calculate characterization factors for chemicals reported in an inventory of a life cycle assessment case study on rice production and consumption; and (4) investigate the influence of effect data selection criteria on resulting indicator scores. Our results highlight the need for careful interpretation of life cycle assessment impact scores in light of robustness of underlying species sensitivity distributions. Next steps are to apply the recommended characterization framework in additional case studies, and to adapt it to soil, sediment and the marine environment. Our framework is applicable for evaluating chemicals in life cycle assessment, chemical and environmental footprinting, chemical substitution, risk screening, chemical prioritization, and comparison with environmental sustainability targets.
化学物质排放到环境中会影响生态系统健康,从局部到全球范围都受到影响,因此减少化学物质的影响已成为欧洲和全球可持续性努力的重要组成部分。本工作通过提出国际专家研讨会的建议和在联合国环境规划署-SETAC 生命周期倡议的 GLAM 项目(全球环境生命周期影响评估指标指南)下开展的工作,推进了生命周期影响评估中化学物质的生态毒性特征化。我们建议通过引入除淡水和相关生态毒性指标以外的其他环境组分,以及通过更好地反映与环境相关的暴露水平并更广泛地纳入慢性测试数据,来扩大评估范围,从而提出了具体的建议。因此,我们:(1) 提出了一种一致的数学框架,用于计算淡水生态毒性特征化因子及其潜在的归宿、暴露和效应参数;(2) 将该框架纳入 USEtox 科学共识模型;(3) 计算了生命周期评估案例研究中大米生产和消费清单中报告的化学物质的特征化因子;(4) 研究了效应数据选择标准对结果指标得分的影响。我们的结果强调了需要根据潜在物种敏感性分布的稳健性来仔细解释生命周期评估影响得分。下一步是将推荐的特征化框架应用于其他案例研究,并将其扩展到土壤、沉积物和海洋环境。我们的框架适用于评估生命周期评估、化学和环境足迹、化学物质替代、风险筛选、化学物质优先级排序以及与环境可持续性目标的比较中的化学物质。