Pellengahr Felicitas, Corella-Puertas Elena, Mattelin Valérie, Saadi Nadim, Bertella Francesca, Boulay Anne-Marie, van der Meer Yvonne
Aachen Maastricht Institute for Biobased Materials, Maastricht University, Geleen, Netherlands.
Department of Chemical Engineering, CIRAIG, Polytechnique Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Front Toxicol. 2025 Mar 17;7:1494220. doi: 10.3389/ftox.2025.1494220. eCollection 2025.
With the continuous increase of plastics production, it is imperative to carefully examine their environmental profile through Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). However, current LCA modeling is not considering the potential impacts of plastic emissions on the biosphere. To integrate plastic emissions into LCA, characterization factors are needed that commonly consist of three elements: a fate factor, an exposure factor, and an effect factor. In this context, fate factors quantify the distribution and longevity of plastics in the environment. Research on these fate factors is still limited, especially for biodegradable polymers. Hence, the main objective of this research was to determine the fate factors of biodegradable polymers [poly (lactic acid), poly (butylene succinate), and poly (ε-caprolactam)] based on primary experimental data for the marine environment.
The validity of former research is tested by comparing the degradation evolution of i. macro- and microplastic particles, ii. two different grades of the polymer, and iii. different temperature levels. The degradation data are obtained by monitoring the oxygen consumption over a period of six months in natural seawater. The determined degradation rates are combined with sedimentation, resuspension, and deep burial rates to obtain fate factors. These fate factors are used to develop polymer-specific characterization factors. The resulting characterization factors are tested in an LCA case study of a synthetic sports shirt made from biodegradable polymer fibers. It allows to assess the relative importance of microplastic impacts compared to other life cycle impacts.
Comparing the resulting specific surface degradation rates indicates that microplastic degradation rates could be overestimated when using macroplastic degradation data. Pertaining to the case study, the results show that the impact on ecosystem quality by microplastic emissions could account for up to 30% of the total endpoint category. Overall, this work aims to foster interdisciplinary collaboration to leverage the accuracy of LCA studies and thus provide guidance for novel material development.
随着塑料产量的持续增加,通过生命周期评估(LCA)仔细审视其环境概况势在必行。然而,当前的LCA建模未考虑塑料排放对生物圈的潜在影响。为了将塑料排放纳入LCA,需要特征因子,其通常由三个要素组成:归宿因子、暴露因子和效应因子。在此背景下,归宿因子量化了塑料在环境中的分布和持久性。对这些归宿因子的研究仍然有限,尤其是对于可生物降解聚合物。因此,本研究的主要目标是基于海洋环境的原始实验数据确定可生物降解聚合物[聚乳酸、聚丁二酸丁二醇酯和聚ε-己内酰胺]的归宿因子。
通过比较以下各项的降解演变来检验先前研究的有效性:i. 宏观和微观塑料颗粒;ii. 两种不同等级的聚合物;iii. 不同温度水平。通过监测天然海水中六个月期间的耗氧量来获取降解数据。将确定的降解速率与沉降、再悬浮和深埋速率相结合以获得归宿因子。这些归宿因子用于开发特定于聚合物的特征因子。在由可生物降解聚合物纤维制成的合成运动衫的LCA案例研究中测试所得的特征因子。这使得能够评估微塑料影响相对于其他生命周期影响的相对重要性。
比较所得的比表面降解速率表明,使用宏观塑料降解数据时可能高估了微塑料降解速率。关于案例研究,结果表明微塑料排放对生态系统质量的影响可能占总终点类别高达30%。总体而言,这项工作旨在促进跨学科合作,以提高LCA研究的准确性,从而为新型材料开发提供指导。