Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM), Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.
Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM), Department of Biology, University of Aveiro, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.
Chemosphere. 2022 Dec;309(Pt 2):136810. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136810. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
Bioplastics have been suggested as more sustainable alternatives to conventional, petroleum-based plastics. In this work, the available studies comparing effects of biopolymers and petroleum-based plastics were reviewed to improve the knowledge on the sustainability of biobased polymers, providing a benchmark regarding their ecotoxicological effects, as well as to highlight research priorities in this field. The literature review shows that, only a small number of the available biopolymers have been tested highlighting the need for more research diversifying the tested polymers. Overall, the available studies support the idea that bioplastics are likely to cause physiological impairments (feeding, reproduction, or locomotion) as well as cellular (proteome and enzyme activity) effects on biota. Furthermore, the studies on bioplastic degradation under realistic conditions report changes in water and sediment quality, which may also have consequences to biota. It is evident that some reservations must be kept regarding conventional plastics substitutions by bioplastics.
生物塑料被认为是比传统石油基塑料更具可持续性的替代品。在这项工作中,我们对比较生物聚合物和石油基塑料影响的现有研究进行了综述,以增进对生物基聚合物可持续性的认识,为其生态毒理学效应提供基准,并突出该领域的研究重点。文献综述表明,只有少数可用的生物聚合物已经过测试,这突出表明需要更多的研究来使测试的聚合物多样化。总的来说,现有研究支持这样一种观点,即生物塑料可能对生物群产生生理损伤(摄食、繁殖或运动)以及细胞(蛋白质组和酶活性)效应。此外,在实际条件下对生物塑料降解的研究报告称,水和沉积物质量发生了变化,这也可能对生物群产生影响。显然,在通过生物塑料替代传统塑料时,必须保留一些保留意见。