• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直肠癌保肛手术后吻合口复发再手术患者非返纳肠造口的临床评估

Clinical assessment for non-reversal stoma and stoma re-creation after reversal surgery for patients with rectal cancer having undergoing sphincter-saving operation.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

Graduate Institute of Athletics and Coaching Science, National Taiwan Sport University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Asian J Surg. 2023 May;46(5):1944-1950. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.09.107. Epub 2022 Oct 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.09.107
PMID:36229306
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to identify the risk factors for permanent stoma (PS) in patients who underwent sphincter-saving operations for rectal cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 597 consecutive patients with rectal cancer from January 2012 to December 2020 at Taipei Medical University Hospital. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to analyze risk factors for PS.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of 47.3 months (range 7-114 months), 59 patients (15.1%) were alive with a PS, including 46 patients who did not undergo reversal surgery and 13 patients who underwent stoma re-creation after reversal surgery. The mean period between primary surgery and stoma reversal was 6.0 months. Multivariate analysis revealed that the risk factors for PS were local recurrence [odd ratio (OR), 25.58; 95% confidence interval (CI), 4.428-147.761; p < 0.001], perirectal abscess [OR, 154.34; 95% CI, 15.806 - >999; p < 0.001], anastomosis site stenosis [OR, 187.081; 95% CI, 22.193 - >999; p < 0.001], perineural invasion [OR, 4.782; 95% CI, 1.22-18.736; p = 0.025], and operation time (min) [OR, 1.008; 95% CI, 1.002-1.014; p = 0.01].

CONCLUSIONS

Local recurrence, perirectal abscess, anastomosis site stenosis, perineural invasion, and operation time were independent risk factors for PS. Therefore, before a patient undergoes surgery for rectal cancer, surgeons should consider the possibility of the need for a PS, and patients should be informed before the operation that closure of the temporary stoma may not always be possible.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在确定接受保肛手术治疗的直肠癌患者发生永久性造口(PS)的风险因素。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2012 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间在台北医学大学附属医院接受治疗的 597 例连续直肠癌患者。采用单因素和多因素分析方法分析 PS 的风险因素。

结果

平均随访 47.3 个月(7-114 个月)后,59 例(15.1%)患者存活且带有 PS,其中 46 例患者未行造口还纳术,13 例患者在造口还纳术后行造口重建术。初次手术与造口还纳术之间的平均时间为 6.0 个月。多因素分析显示,PS 的危险因素包括局部复发[比值比(OR),25.58;95%置信区间(CI),4.428-147.761;p<0.001]、直肠周围脓肿(OR,154.34;95%CI,15.806- >999;p<0.001)、吻合口狭窄(OR,187.081;95%CI,22.193- >999;p<0.001)、神经周围侵犯(OR,4.782;95%CI,1.22-18.736;p=0.025)和手术时间(min)(OR,1.008;95%CI,1.002-1.014;p=0.01)。

结论

局部复发、直肠周围脓肿、吻合口狭窄、神经周围侵犯和手术时间是 PS 的独立危险因素。因此,在患者接受直肠癌手术前,外科医生应考虑是否需要永久性造口的可能性,并且应在手术前告知患者,临时造口的关闭并非总是可行的。

相似文献

1
Clinical assessment for non-reversal stoma and stoma re-creation after reversal surgery for patients with rectal cancer having undergoing sphincter-saving operation.直肠癌保肛手术后吻合口复发再手术患者非返纳肠造口的临床评估
Asian J Surg. 2023 May;46(5):1944-1950. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.09.107. Epub 2022 Oct 11.
2
[Risk factors of permanent stoma in rectal cancer patients undergoing transabdominal anterior resection with temporary stoma].[行经腹前切除术并临时造口的直肠癌患者永久性造口的危险因素]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Aug 25;23(8):780-785. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20191107-00475.
3
Risk factors for permanent stoma after rectal cancer surgery with temporary ileostomy.直肠癌手术并临时回肠造口术后永久性造口的危险因素。
Surgery. 2016 Mar;159(3):721-7. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.09.011. Epub 2015 Oct 17.
4
Nomogram to predict permanent stoma in rectal cancer patients after sphincter-saving surgery.预测直肠癌保肛手术后永久性造口的列线图。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2022 Aug 27;14(8):765-777. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i8.765.
5
The fate of preserved sphincter in rectal cancer patients.直肠癌患者保留括约肌的预后
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Jun;33(6):745-753. doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3001-2. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
6
Cumulative Incidence and Risk Factors of Permanent Stoma After Intersphincteric Resection for Ultralow Rectal Cancer.超低位直肠癌经括约肌间切除术永久性造口的累积发生率及危险因素。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2022 Jan 1;65(1):66-75. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002036.
7
Low anterior resection combined with a covering stoma in the treatment of rectal cancer reduces the risk of permanent anastomotic failure.低位前切除术联合造口术治疗直肠癌可降低永久性吻合口失败的风险。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Oct;30(10):1323-8. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2291-x. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
8
Preoperative risk stratification of permanent stoma in patients with non-metastatic mid and low rectal cancer undergoing curative resection and a temporary stoma.根治性切除及临时性造口术治疗非转移性中低位直肠癌患者永久性造口的术前风险分层。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Aug;407(5):1991-1999. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02503-x. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
9
Recurrence of rectal anastomotic leakage following stoma closure: assessment of risk factors.肠造口关闭术后直肠吻合口漏复发的评估:危险因素分析。
Colorectal Dis. 2019 Nov;21(11):1304-1311. doi: 10.1111/codi.14728. Epub 2019 Jul 7.
10
Predictors of permanent stoma creation in patients with mid or low rectal cancer: results of a multicentre cohort study with preoperative evaluation of anal function.中低位直肠癌患者永久性造口形成的预测因素:一项术前评估肛门功能的多中心队列研究结果
Colorectal Dis. 2020 Apr;22(4):399-407. doi: 10.1111/codi.14898. Epub 2019 Nov 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Is It Worth Performing Intersphincteric Resection in Patients Having Rectal Adenocarcinoma with Oligometastasis.对伴有寡转移的直肠腺癌患者进行括约肌间切除术是否值得。
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr;16(2):645-650. doi: 10.1007/s13193-024-02117-3. Epub 2024 Oct 26.
2
A novel perineal exposure method in laparoscopic abdominal perineal resection of rectal cancer: a case series study.一种新型的腹腔镜经会阴直肠癌腹会阴联合切除术会阴入路方法:一项病例系列研究。
BMC Surg. 2024 May 20;24(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02453-9.