School of Economics and Management, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China.
Comprehensive Development Office, Shanghai Pudong New Area Agriculture and Rural Committee, Shanghai 201304, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 7;19(19):12848. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912848.
(1) Background: Even though the quality of life in urban and rural areas is better than in traditional rural villages, it is hard to keep up good governance over the long term. Exploring the limitations of villagers' participation in the long-term management of urban rural habitat is exemplary from the perspective of sustainable development in order to improve rural habitat, promote sustainable economic and environmental development, and accomplish rural revitalization. (2) Methods: Long-term management indicators were proposed to provide a technique for evaluating the governance efficacy of urban and rural living environments. Based on the survey data obtained in Shanghai, the ordered logistic-ISM model was used to examine the influencing aspects of urban and rural living environment governance efficacy. (3) Results: In addition to environmental improvement conditions and other factors, long-term management in the village has a significant favorable impact on the evaluation of the governance effect on the living environment in urban and rural locations. (4) Conclusions: Long-term management directly supports villager engagement in environmental development and village infrastructure improvement and has a significant positive impact on the governance of urban and rural living environments. Improvements in infrastructure immediately benefit the administration of urban and rural living situations. Creating a long-term management structure, supporting cooperative governance, optimizing corrective actions, coordinating investments, and advancing ecological and economic sustainability are just a few of the policy improvements suggested.
（1）背景：尽管城乡地区的生活质量优于传统农村，但长期保持良好的治理却很难。从可持续发展的角度探索村民参与城乡人居长期管理的局限性，是改善农村人居、促进经济环境可持续发展、实现乡村振兴的典范。（2）方法：提出了长期管理指标，为城乡人居环境治理效果的评价提供了技术支持。基于在上海获得的调查数据，采用有序逻辑-ISM 模型，检验了城乡人居环境治理效果的影响因素。（3）结果：除了环境改善条件等因素外，村庄的长期管理对城乡居住环境治理效果评价具有显著的积极影响。（4）结论：长期管理直接支持村民参与环境发展和村庄基础设施改善，对城乡居住环境的治理具有显著的正向影响。基础设施的改善立即有利于城乡居住情况的管理。构建长期管理结构、支持合作治理、优化纠正措施、协调投资以及推进生态和经济可持续性只是提出的一些政策改进建议。
