• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肺癌患者单孔电视辅助解剖手术24小时内早期拔除猪尾导管引流的短期结局。

The short-term outcomes for the early removal of pigtail catheter drainage within 24 hours of uniportal video-assisted anatomic surgery in patients with lung cancer.

作者信息

Zheng Shuo, Shi Qinlang, Ma Qinya, Fu Qiang, Qiao Kun

机构信息

The Second Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.

Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Third People's Hospital of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.

出版信息

Transl Cancer Res. 2022 Sep;11(9):3260-3266. doi: 10.21037/tcr-22-1910.

DOI:10.21037/tcr-22-1910
PMID:36237245
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9552068/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early removal of the chest tube has advantages of reducing postoperative pain and speed recovery. This study aimed to confirm its safety and feasibility of early removal of a pigtail catheter used as a chest drain in patients undergoing anatomical surgery.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 126 patients who removed pigtail catheter ≤24 h after surgery, and 56 patients >24 h who underwent uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (u-VATS) between January 2020 and April 2022. All patients had stage I lung cancer and underwent anatomical surgery (lobectomy or segmentectomy). The clinical characteristics, perioperative data, and postoperative complications of both groups were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

The >24 h group had more patients with a higher body mass index (BMI) (P<0.001), a lower forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) (P<0.001), Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (P<0.001), and current smokers (P=0.006) than the ≤24 h group. There were no significant differences in terms of age, sex, type of resection, operation time, and bleeding loss between the two groups (P>0.05). The pain of patients in the ≤24 h group was significantly less than that in the >24 h group only on the third postoperative day (P=0.035). There were no significant differences in the postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) at postoperative day 0, day 1, day 7, and 1 month between the two groups (P>0.05). With the exception of a higher occurrence of subcutaneous emphysema in the >24 h group (71.7% 100%, P=0.001), there were no statistically significant differences in the postoperative complications (e.g., pneumonia, atrial fibrillation, atelectasis, pleural effusion, and wound infection) between the 2 groups (P>0.05). During the 30-day follow-up period, none of the patients required tube reinsertion for pneumothorax. A total of 8 patients in the ≤24 h group and 4 in the >24 h group required tube reinsertion (6.7% 7.1%, P>0.99) due to pleural effusion.

CONCLUSIONS

In stage I lung cancer patients who underwent u-VATS anatomic surgery, the pigtail catheter used as a thoracic drainage tube removed with 24 h after was safe and feasible.

摘要

背景

早期拔除胸管具有减轻术后疼痛和加速康复的优点。本研究旨在证实早期拔除用于解剖性手术患者的猪尾导管作为胸腔引流管的安全性和可行性。

方法

这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2020年1月至2022年4月期间接受单孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术(u-VATS)且术后≤24小时拔除猪尾导管的126例患者,以及术后>24小时拔除的56例患者。所有患者均为I期肺癌并接受了解剖性手术(肺叶切除术或肺段切除术)。分析并比较了两组患者的临床特征、围手术期数据和术后并发症。

结果

24小时组患者的体重指数(BMI)较高(P<0.001)、第一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)较低(P<0.001)、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患病率较高(P<0.001)以及当前吸烟者比例较高(P=0.006),均高于≤24小时组。两组在年龄、性别、切除类型、手术时间和失血量方面无显著差异(P>0.05)。仅在术后第三天,≤24小时组患者的疼痛明显低于>24小时组(P=0.035)。两组在术后第0天、第1天、第7天和1个月时的术后视觉模拟评分(VAS)无显著差异(P>0.05)。除了>24小时组皮下气肿发生率较高(71.7%对100%,P=0.001)外,两组术后并发症(如肺炎、心房颤动、肺不张、胸腔积液和伤口感染)无统计学显著差异(P>0.05)。在30天随访期内,无患者因气胸需要重新置管。≤24小时组共有8例患者,>24小时组有4例患者因胸腔积液需要重新置管(6.7%对7.1%,P>0.99)。

结论

在接受u-VATS解剖性手术的I期肺癌患者中,术后24小时内拔除作为胸腔引流管的猪尾导管是安全可行的。

相似文献

1
The short-term outcomes for the early removal of pigtail catheter drainage within 24 hours of uniportal video-assisted anatomic surgery in patients with lung cancer.肺癌患者单孔电视辅助解剖手术24小时内早期拔除猪尾导管引流的短期结局。
Transl Cancer Res. 2022 Sep;11(9):3260-3266. doi: 10.21037/tcr-22-1910.
2
Safety of one 8.5-Fr pigtail catheter for postoperative continuous open gravity drainage after uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery pneumonectomy.单孔胸腔镜肺叶切除术术后连续开放重力引流采用 8.5Fr 猪尾导管的安全性。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Jul 18;19(1):457. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02894-6.
3
Application of drainage strategy with bi-pigtail catheters in patients undergoing lobectomy by uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery.双猪尾导管引流策略在单孔电视辅助胸腔镜肺叶切除术患者中的应用
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Jul 30;16(7):4597-4606. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-925. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
4
[Application of Two Ultrafine Chest Tube for Drainage after
Pulmonary Uniportal Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery].[两根超细胸腔引流管在单孔胸腔镜肺叶切除术后引流中的应用]
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2021 Aug 20;24(8):577-582. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2021.101.23. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
5
Safety and feasibility of a novel chest tube placement in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for non-small cell lung cancer.单孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术中新型胸腔引流管置管术用于非小细胞肺癌的安全性和可行性。
Thorac Cancer. 2023 Sep;14(26):2648-2656. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.15049. Epub 2023 Jul 25.
6
Perioperative outcomes of bi-pigtail catheter drainage strategy versus conventional chest tube after uniportal video-assisted thoracic lung surgery.单孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术后双猪尾导管引流策略与传统胸腔管引流的围手术期结果比较。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 Dec 1;64(6). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezad411.
7
A prospective randomized, controlled trial deems a drainage of 300 ml/day safe before removal of the last chest drain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy.一项前瞻性随机对照试验认为,在电视辅助胸腔镜手术肺叶切除术后拔除最后一根胸引管之前,每日引流量300毫升是安全的。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Aug;21(2):200-5. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv115. Epub 2015 May 15.
8
A novel drainage strategy using chest tube plus pleural catheter in uniportal upper lobectomy: A randomized controlled trial.单孔胸腔镜肺上叶切除术中应用胸腔引流管加胸膜腔引流管的新引流策略:一项随机对照试验。
Thorac Cancer. 2023 Feb;14(4):399-406. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.14759. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
9
Application of small-bore pigtail catheter to improve pleural drainage after single-incision thoracoscopic lobectomy for lung cancer.应用小口径猪尾导管提高单孔胸腔镜肺癌肺叶切除术后胸腔引流效果
ANZ J Surg. 2020 Jan;90(1-2):139-143. doi: 10.1111/ans.15595. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
10
Is it safe and practical to use a Foley catheter as a chest tube for lung cancer patients after lobectomy? A prospective cohort study with 441 cases.肺叶切除术后使用 Foley 导管作为胸腔引流管治疗肺癌患者是否安全实用?一项前瞻性队列研究纳入了 441 例病例。
Int J Surg. 2018 Aug;56:215-220. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.06.028. Epub 2018 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Drainology: Leveraging research in chest-drain management to enhance recovery after cardiothoracic surgery.引流学:利用胸管引流管理方面的研究来提高心胸外科手术后的恢复效果。
JTCVS Tech. 2024 Apr 9;25:226-240. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2024.04.001. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Editorial: Early chest drain removal following lung resection.社论:肺切除术后早期拔除胸腔引流管
Front Surg. 2023 Mar 31;10:1185334. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1185334. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Early and locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: an update of the ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines focusing on diagnosis, staging, systemic and local therapy.早期和局部晚期非小细胞肺癌:聚焦诊断、分期、全身及局部治疗的ESMO临床实践指南更新
Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1637-1642. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.1994. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
2
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
3
A Novel Tubeless Urinary Catheter Protocol Enhanced Recovery After Minimally Invasive Lung Surgery.一种新型无管导尿方案可促进微创肺切除术后的恢复。
Front Surg. 2020 Nov 9;7:584578. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.584578. eCollection 2020.
4
Early postoperative day 0 chest tube removal using a digital drainage device protocol after thoracoscopic major pulmonary resection.胸腔镜肺叶切除术后使用数字引流装置方案于术后第 0 天拔管。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020 Nov 1;31(5):657-663. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa170.
5
Non-intubated thoracoscopic lobectomies for lung cancer: an exploratory systematic review and meta-analysis.非插管胸腔镜肺叶切除术治疗肺癌:探索性系统评价和荟萃分析。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020 Oct 1;31(4):499-506. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa141.
6
Guidelines for enhanced recovery after lung surgery: recommendations of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS).肺手术后加速康复外科指南:加速康复外科(ERAS®)协会和欧洲胸外科医师学会(ESTS)的建议。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Jan 1;55(1):91-115. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy301.
7
Does the usage of digital chest drainage systems reduce pleural inflammation and volume of pleural effusion following oncologic pulmonary resection?-A prospective randomized trial.使用数字胸腔引流系统是否能减少肿瘤性肺切除术后的胸膜炎症和胸腔积液量?一项前瞻性随机试验。
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Jun;9(6):1598-1606. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.05.78.
8
Lung Cancer Screening and Its Impact on Surgical Volume.肺癌筛查及其对外科手术量的影响。
Surg Clin North Am. 2017 Aug;97(4):751-762. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2017.03.006.
9
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Enhanced Recovery After Colon and Rectal Surgery From the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons.美国结直肠外科医师协会和美国胃肠与内镜外科医师协会发布的《结肠直肠手术后加速康复临床实践指南》
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Aug;60(8):761-784. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000883.
10
Prospective evaluation of biodegradable polymeric sealant for intraoperative air leaks.术中漏气用可生物降解聚合物密封剂的前瞻性评估。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Dec 12;11(1):168. doi: 10.1186/s13019-016-0563-3.