• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[数字乳腺摄影作为韩国的一种筛查工具]

[Digital Mammography as a Screening Tool in Korea].

作者信息

Song Soo Yeon, Hong Seri, Jun Jae Kwan

出版信息

Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi. 2021 Jan;82(1):2-11. doi: 10.3348/jksr.2021.0004. Epub 2021 Jan 31.

DOI:10.3348/jksr.2021.0004
PMID:36237465
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9432404/
Abstract

More than 4 million women undergo breast cancer (BC) screening with mammography each year in Korea. Digital mammography (DM) was introduced in 2000, and it has been reported to have a higher diagnostic accuracy than screen-film mammography (SFM) or computed radiography (CR) in women with dense breasts. According to a study using data from the National Cancer Screening Program for BC, the diagnostic accuracy of DM was higher than those of SFM and CR, regardless of age, breast density, and screening round. Currently, despite high supply rate among OECD countries, the distribution of DM equipment is approximately 35% in Korea. For quick replacement with DM, it will be necessary to improve its fee for the National Health Insurance and support an educational program for radiologists. In addition, efforts should be made to increase the accessibility of DM.

摘要

在韩国,每年有超过400万女性接受乳腺钼靶检查以筛查乳腺癌。数字乳腺钼靶(DM)于2000年引入,据报道,在乳腺致密的女性中,其诊断准确性高于屏-片乳腺钼靶(SFM)或计算机X线摄影(CR)。根据一项利用国家乳腺癌筛查项目数据进行的研究,无论年龄、乳腺密度和筛查轮次如何,DM的诊断准确性均高于SFM和CR。目前,尽管经合组织国家的DM设备供应率较高,但在韩国,DM设备的普及率约为35%。为了快速替换为DM,有必要提高其在国民健康保险中的费用,并支持针对放射科医生的教育项目。此外,应努力提高DM的可及性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95d7/9432404/c4b24bfbe864/jksr-82-2-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95d7/9432404/d0c18279d262/jksr-82-2-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95d7/9432404/0041ff15b879/jksr-82-2-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95d7/9432404/091c8ea06b27/jksr-82-2-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95d7/9432404/c4b24bfbe864/jksr-82-2-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95d7/9432404/d0c18279d262/jksr-82-2-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95d7/9432404/0041ff15b879/jksr-82-2-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95d7/9432404/091c8ea06b27/jksr-82-2-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95d7/9432404/c4b24bfbe864/jksr-82-2-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
[Digital Mammography as a Screening Tool in Korea].[数字乳腺摄影作为韩国的一种筛查工具]
Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi. 2021 Jan;82(1):2-11. doi: 10.3348/jksr.2021.0004. Epub 2021 Jan 31.
2
Effect of Digital Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening: A Comparative Study of More than 8 Million Korean Women.数字乳腺 X 线摄影术用于乳腺癌筛查的效果:超过 800 万韩国女性的对比研究。
Radiology. 2020 Feb;294(2):247-255. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019190951. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
3
4
Nation-wide data on screening performance during the transition to digital mammography: observations in 6 million screens.全国范围内数字化乳腺摄影过渡期间的筛查性能数据:600 万次筛查的观察结果。
Eur J Cancer. 2013 Nov;49(16):3517-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.06.020. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
5
Mammographic findings of women recalled for diagnostic work-up in digital versus screen-film mammography in a population-based screening program.在一项基于人群的筛查项目中,因诊断性检查而被召回的女性在数字化乳腺钼靶与屏-片乳腺钼靶检查中的乳腺钼靶检查结果。
Acta Radiol. 2010 Jun;51(5):491-7. doi: 10.3109/02841851003691961.
6
Comparison of Digital and Screen-Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.数字乳腺摄影与屏-片乳腺摄影用于乳腺癌筛查的比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Breast Cancer. 2019 Jun;22(2):311-325. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2019.22.e24.
7
Comparison of direct digital mammography, computed radiography, and film-screen in the French national breast cancer screening program.法国国家乳腺癌筛查计划中直接数字化乳腺 X 线摄影、计算机放射成像和屏片的比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Jan;202(1):229-36. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.10419.
8
Digital Compared with Screen-Film Mammography: Measures of Diagnostic Accuracy among Women Screened in the Ontario Breast Screening Program.数字乳腺 X 线摄影与屏片乳腺摄影的比较:安大略省乳腺筛查计划中筛查女性的诊断准确性测量。
Radiology. 2016 Feb;278(2):365-73. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015150733. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
9
Detection and interval cancer rates during the transition from screen-film to digital mammography in population-based screening.基于人群筛查中从屏片乳腺摄影向数字化乳腺摄影过渡期间的检出率和间隔期癌症率。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Mar 5;18(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4122-2.
10
Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography.乳腺非钙化性导管原位癌:数字乳腺断层合成、数字乳腺钼靶摄影及超声检查诊断准确性的比较
Breast Cancer. 2017 Jul;24(4):562-570. doi: 10.1007/s12282-016-0739-7. Epub 2016 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends in breast cancer screening rates among Korean women: results from the Korean National Cancer Screening Survey, 2005-2020.韩国女性乳腺癌筛查率趋势:来自 2005-2020 年韩国国家癌症筛查调查的结果。
Epidemiol Health. 2022;44:e2022111. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2022111. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
2
Family history of breast cancer, mammographic breast density and breast cancer risk: Findings from a cohort study of Korean women.乳腺癌家族史、乳腺 X 线摄影密度与乳腺癌风险:一项韩国女性队列研究的结果。
Breast. 2022 Oct;65:180-186. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2022.08.008. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
3
Survival Outcomes of Patients With Breast Cancer Diagnosed Using Vacuum-Assisted Biopsy: A Nationwide Study From the Korean Breast Cancer Society.

本文引用的文献

1
Changes in cancer detection and false-positive recall in mammography using artificial intelligence: a retrospective, multireader study.人工智能在乳腺癌检测和假阳性召回中的变化:一项回顾性、多读者研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Mar;2(3):e138-e148. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30003-0. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
2
Cancer Statistics in Korea: Incidence, Mortality, Survival, and Prevalence in 2017.韩国癌症统计数据:2017 年发病率、死亡率、生存率和患病率。
Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Apr;52(2):335-350. doi: 10.4143/crt.2020.206. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
3
International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening.
真空辅助活检诊断的乳腺癌患者的生存结局:韩国乳腺癌协会的一项全国性研究
J Breast Cancer. 2022 Feb;25(1):13-24. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2022.25.e2. Epub 2021 Dec 9.
国际乳腺癌筛查人工智能系统评估。
Nature. 2020 Jan;577(7788):89-94. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1799-6. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
4
Effect of Different Types of Mammography Equipment on Screening Outcomes: A Report by the Alliance for Breast Cancer Screening in Korea.不同类型乳腺摄影设备对筛查结果的影响:韩国乳腺癌筛查联盟报告。
Korean J Radiol. 2019 Dec;20(12):1638-1645. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0006.
5
Effect of Digital Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening: A Comparative Study of More than 8 Million Korean Women.数字乳腺 X 线摄影术用于乳腺癌筛查的效果:超过 800 万韩国女性的对比研究。
Radiology. 2020 Feb;294(2):247-255. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019190951. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
6
Comparison of Digital and Screen-Film Mammography for Breast-Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.数字乳腺摄影与屏-片乳腺摄影用于乳腺癌筛查的比较:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Breast Cancer. 2019 Jun;22(2):311-325. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2019.22.e24.
7
Prevalence of Women with Dense Breasts in Korea: Results from a Nationwide Cross-sectional Study.韩国致密型乳腺女性的患病率:一项全国性横断面研究的结果。
Cancer Res Treat. 2019 Oct;51(4):1295-1301. doi: 10.4143/crt.2018.297. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
8
Socioeconomic Inequalities in Cervical and Breast Cancer Screening among Women in Korea, 2005-2015.2005 - 2015年韩国女性宫颈癌和乳腺癌筛查中的社会经济不平等现象
Yonsei Med J. 2018 Nov;59(9):1026-1033. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2018.59.9.1026.
9
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.全球癌症统计数据 2018:GLOBOCAN 对全球 185 个国家/地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率的估计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
10
Detection and interval cancer rates during the transition from screen-film to digital mammography in population-based screening.基于人群筛查中从屏片乳腺摄影向数字化乳腺摄影过渡期间的检出率和间隔期癌症率。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Mar 5;18(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4122-2.