Walker A
Int J Health Serv. 1987;17(3):369-86. doi: 10.2190/Q4X5-AC1D-LBG0-5L63.
In common with most modern industrial societies, Great Britain is facing the unique late 20th century phenomenon of rapidly increasing numbers of people, especially very elderly people, requiring health and social care. The response in Britain has been to search for ways to enlarge the caring capacity of the "community" and, thereby, reduce the demands on public health and social services. Similar policy responses have been developed in other capitalist societies such as Canada, France, and the United States. Although a policy of "community care"--the provision of state services in people's own homes--was followed by governments of both major British political parties over the postwar period, under the right wing neo-monetarist regime of the present Thatcher administration the locus of policy has shifted toward encouraging greater reliance on the informal support networks of kin, friends, and neighbors. The reasons for this sea-change are explored and the assumptions that these networks are "natural" and necessarily the proper matrix of care are examined critically. This analysis draws on the results of recent research which indicates that informal support networks have significant limitations and that a policy based on withdrawing public services in the hope that these networks will fill the growing care gap is likely to be counterproductive. In conclusion, the author indicates the areas where further research is required to provide a sound basis for policy.
与大多数现代工业社会一样,英国正面临着20世纪后期特有的现象:需要健康和社会护理的人数迅速增加,尤其是老年人。英国的应对措施是寻找扩大“社区”护理能力的方法,从而减少对公共卫生和社会服务的需求。加拿大、法国和美国等其他资本主义社会也出台了类似的政策应对措施。尽管战后英国两大主要政党的政府都推行了“社区护理”政策,即在人们自己家中提供国家服务,但在当前撒切尔政府的右翼新货币主义政权下,政策重点已转向鼓励更多地依赖亲属、朋友和邻居的非正式支持网络。本文探讨了这一巨变的原因,并对这些网络是“天然的”且必然是合适的护理框架这一假设进行了批判性审视。该分析借鉴了近期研究结果,这些结果表明非正式支持网络存在重大局限性,而基于削减公共服务、寄希望于这些网络来填补日益扩大的护理缺口的政策可能会适得其反。最后,作者指出了需要进一步研究以提供合理政策依据的领域。