• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多层次分析中缺失嵌套层次的影响。

The effect of missing levels of nesting in multilevel analysis.

作者信息

Park Seho, Chung Yujin

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.

Department of Applied Statistics, Kyonggi University, Suwon 16227, Korea.

出版信息

Genomics Inform. 2022 Sep;20(3):e34. doi: 10.5808/gi.22052. Epub 2022 Sep 30.

DOI:10.5808/gi.22052
PMID:36239111
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9576476/
Abstract

Multilevel analysis is an appropriate and powerful tool for analyzing hierarchical structure data widely applied from public health to genomic data. In practice, however, we may lose the information on multiple nesting levels in the multilevel analysis since data may fail to capture all levels of hierarchy, or the top or intermediate levels of hierarchy are ignored in the analysis. In this study, we consider a multilevel linear mixed effect model (LMM) with single imputation that can involve all data hierarchy levels in the presence of missing top or intermediate-level clusters. We evaluate and compare the performance of a multilevel LMM with single imputation with other models ignoring the data hierarchy or missing intermediate-level clusters. To this end, we applied a multilevel LMM with single imputation and other models to hierarchically structured cohort data with some intermediate levels missing and to simulated data with various cluster sizes and missing rates of intermediate-level clusters. A thorough simulation study demonstrated that an LMM with single imputation estimates fixed coefficients and variance components of a multilevel model more accurately than other models ignoring data hierarchy or missing clusters in terms of mean squared error and coverage probability. In particular, when models ignoring data hierarchy or missing clusters were applied, the variance components of random effects were overestimated. We observed similar results from the analysis of hierarchically structured cohort data.

摘要

多水平分析是一种适用于分析从公共卫生到基因组数据等广泛应用的层次结构数据的强大工具。然而在实践中,由于数据可能无法捕捉到层次结构的所有级别,或者在分析中忽略了层次结构的顶层或中间层,我们在多水平分析中可能会丢失关于多个嵌套级别的信息。在本研究中,我们考虑一种具有单次插补的多水平线性混合效应模型(LMM),该模型在存在缺失的顶层或中间层聚类时可以纳入所有数据层次级别。我们评估并比较了具有单次插补的多水平LMM与其他忽略数据层次结构或缺失中间层聚类的模型的性能。为此,我们将具有单次插补的多水平LMM和其他模型应用于具有一些缺失中间层的层次结构队列数据以及具有各种聚类大小和中间层聚类缺失率的模拟数据。一项全面的模拟研究表明,就均方误差和覆盖概率而言,具有单次插补的LMM比其他忽略数据层次结构或缺失聚类的模型更准确地估计多水平模型的固定系数和方差分量。特别是,当应用忽略数据层次结构或缺失聚类的模型时,随机效应的方差分量被高估。我们从对层次结构队列数据的分析中观察到了类似的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1359/9576476/0b7911b5628d/gi-22052f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1359/9576476/bbed707c315f/gi-22052f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1359/9576476/a8295d41b9d6/gi-22052f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1359/9576476/1568b5a049aa/gi-22052f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1359/9576476/55f197e84332/gi-22052f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1359/9576476/0b7911b5628d/gi-22052f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1359/9576476/bbed707c315f/gi-22052f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1359/9576476/a8295d41b9d6/gi-22052f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1359/9576476/1568b5a049aa/gi-22052f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1359/9576476/55f197e84332/gi-22052f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1359/9576476/0b7911b5628d/gi-22052f5.jpg

相似文献

1
The effect of missing levels of nesting in multilevel analysis.多层次分析中缺失嵌套层次的影响。
Genomics Inform. 2022 Sep;20(3):e34. doi: 10.5808/gi.22052. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
2
The Consequence of Ignoring a Level of Nesting in Multilevel Analysis.在多层次分析中忽略嵌套层次的后果。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2004 Jan 1;39(1):129-49. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_5.
3
Multiple imputation methods for handling missing data in cost-effectiveness analyses that use data from hierarchical studies: an application to cluster randomized trials.多变量填补方法在使用来自层级研究数据的成本效益分析中处理缺失数据:一项对整群随机试验的应用。
Med Decis Making. 2013 Nov;33(8):1051-63. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13492203. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
4
Simple imputation methods versus direct likelihood analysis for missing item scores in multilevel educational data.简单插补法与直接似然分析在多层次教育数据中缺失项目得分的应用比较。
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Jun;44(2):516-31. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0157-x.
5
Biases in multilevel analyses caused by cluster-specific fixed-effects imputation.由簇特定固定效应插补引起的多层次分析中的偏差。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Oct;50(5):1824-1840. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0951-1.
6
Multiple imputation of missing data in multilevel designs: A comparison of different strategies.多水平设计中缺失数据的多重插补:不同策略的比较。
Psychol Methods. 2017 Mar;22(1):141-165. doi: 10.1037/met0000096. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
7
Multiple imputation by chained equations for systematically and sporadically missing multilevel data.多水平数据系统缺失和随机缺失的链方程多重插补法。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Jun;27(6):1634-1649. doi: 10.1177/0962280216666564. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
8
Analysis of single-case experimental count data using the linear mixed effects model: A simulation study.运用线性混合效应模型分析单案例实验计数数据:一项模拟研究。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Dec;51(6):2477-2497. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1091-y.
9
Ignoring a Multilevel Structure in Mixture Item Response Models: Impact on Parameter Recovery and Model Selection.忽略混合项目反应模型中的多层次结构:对参数恢复和模型选择的影响。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2018 Mar;42(2):136-154. doi: 10.1177/0146621617711999. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
10
Multiple imputation methods for bivariate outcomes in cluster randomised trials.整群随机试验中双变量结局的多重填补方法。
Stat Med. 2016 Sep 10;35(20):3482-96. doi: 10.1002/sim.6935. Epub 2016 Mar 14.

本文引用的文献

1
A Novel Cluster Sampling Design that Couples Multiple Surveys to Support Multiple Inferential Objectives.一种将多项调查相结合以支持多个推断目标的新型整群抽样设计。
Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol. 2020 Sep;20(2-3):85-110. doi: 10.1007/s10742-020-00210-y. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
2
Evaluation of approaches for multiple imputation of three-level data.三水平数据的多重插补方法评价。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Aug 12;20(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01079-8.
3
Multiple imputation of missing data in multilevel designs: A comparison of different strategies.
多水平设计中缺失数据的多重插补:不同策略的比较。
Psychol Methods. 2017 Mar;22(1):141-165. doi: 10.1037/met0000096. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
4
Study protocol: the Childhood to Adolescence Transition Study (CATS).研究方案:儿童到青少年过渡期研究(CATS)。
BMC Pediatr. 2013 Oct 8;13:160. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-13-160.
5
Comparing methods of analysing datasets with small clusters: case studies using four paediatric datasets.比较具有小聚类的数据集的分析方法:使用四个儿科数据集的案例研究
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2009 Jul;23(4):380-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2009.01046.x.
6
When can group level clustering be ignored? Multilevel models versus single-level models with sparse data.何时可以忽略群组层面的聚类?多层模型与具有稀疏数据的单层面模型的比较。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008 Aug;62(8):752-8. doi: 10.1136/jech.2007.060798.
7
A simulation study of sample size for multilevel logistic regression models.多水平逻辑回归模型样本量的模拟研究
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007 Jul 16;7:34. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-7-34.
8
Principles of multilevel modelling.多层次建模原理
Int J Epidemiol. 2000 Feb;29(1):158-67. doi: 10.1093/ije/29.1.158.