Key Laboratory of Spine and Spinal Cord Injury Repair and Regeneration of the Ministry of Education, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai University of Medicine & Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2022 Oct;236(10):1541-1551. doi: 10.1177/09544119221122007. Epub 2022 Sep 10.
Previous literature has investigated the biomechanical response of healthy and degenerative discs, but the biomechanical response of suboptimal healthy intervertebral discs received less attention. The purpose was to compare the biomechanical responses and risk of herniation of young healthy, suboptimal healthy, and degenerative intervertebral discs. A cervical spine model was established and validated using the finite element method. Suboptimal healthy, mildly, moderately, and severely degenerative disc models were developed. Disc height deformation, range of motion, intradiscal pressure, and von Mises stress in annulus fibrosus were analyzed by applying a moment of 4 Nm in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation with 100 N compressive loads. Disc height deformation in young healthy, suboptimal healthy, mildly, moderately, and severely degenerative discs was 40%, 37%, 21%, 12%, and 8%, respectively. The decreasing order of the range of motion was young healthy spine > suboptimal healthy spine > mildly degenerative spine > moderately degenerative spine > severely degenerative spine. The mean stress of annulus ground substance in the suboptimal healthy disc was higher than in the young healthy disc. The mean stress of inter-lamellar matrix and annulus ground substance in moderately and severely degenerative discs was higher than in other discs. Age-related structural changes and degenerative changes increased the stiffness and reduced the elastic deformation of intervertebral discs. Decreased range of motion due to the effects of aging or degeneration on the intervertebral disc, may cause compensation of adjacent segments and lead to progressive degeneration of multiple segments. The effect of aging on the intervertebral disc increased the risk of annulus fibrosus damage from the biomechanical point of view. Moderately and severely degenerative discs may have a higher risk of herniation due to the higher risk of damage and layers separation of annulus fibrosus caused by increased stress in the annulus ground substance and inter-lamellar matrix.
先前的文献已经研究了健康和退行性椎间盘的生物力学反应,但对不理想健康的椎间盘的生物力学反应关注较少。目的是比较年轻健康、不理想健康和退行性椎间盘的生物力学反应和突出风险。使用有限元方法建立并验证了颈椎模型。建立了不理想健康、轻度、中度和重度退行性椎间盘模型。在施加 4 Nm 的弯矩,进行前屈、后伸、侧屈和轴向旋转,并施加 100 N 的压缩载荷的情况下,分析椎间盘高度变形、运动范围、椎间盘内压力和纤维环的 von Mises 应力。年轻健康、不理想健康、轻度、中度和重度退行性椎间盘的椎间盘高度变形分别为 40%、37%、21%、12%和 8%。运动范围的递减顺序为年轻健康脊柱>不理想健康脊柱>轻度退行性脊柱>中度退行性脊柱>重度退行性脊柱。不理想健康椎间盘的基质内环形物质的平均应力高于年轻健康椎间盘。中度和重度退行性椎间盘的层间基质和基质内环形物质的平均应力高于其他椎间盘。年龄相关的结构变化和退行性变化增加了椎间盘的刚度,减少了椎间盘的弹性变形。由于椎间盘老化或退变的影响,运动范围减小,可能导致相邻节段的代偿,导致多个节段的进行性退变。从生物力学的角度来看,椎间盘老化对椎间盘的影响增加了纤维环损伤的风险。由于基质内环形物质和层间基质内应力增加导致纤维环损伤和分层的风险增加,中度和重度退行性椎间盘可能有更高的突出风险。