From the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Kolding (HKN, TB, EEW, HSP, ACB) and Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark (HKN, ACB).
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2022 Dec 1;39(12):939-952. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001761. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
Emergency caesarean sections are often very urgent, with limited time for informing and guiding parents. Is it preferable to leave the partner outside of the operating room, or let the partner accompany the mother?
This review aimed to provide an overview of the available evidence regarding the presence of the partner in the operating room during emergency caesarean sections.
Scoping review.
A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Cinahl and the Cochrane Library.
All published literature reporting on emergency caesarean sections in regional or general anaesthesia with the partner present in the operating room were eligible, no matter the design.
Twenty-four titles, published between 1984 and 2020, were included; 15 contained original clinical findings and 9 were letters/debates. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and found to be very low/low (17 studies), moderate (6) or good (1). Studies originated from Europe (16 studies), USA/Canada (4), South America (2), Asia (1) and Africa (1). Content data were thematically summarised and were overall either in favour or against having the partner present. Staff seemed reluctant to let partners be present for caesarean sections under general anaesthesia; mothers and partners preferred the partners' presence. Under regional anaesthesia, parents also wished for the partners' presence and described the caesarean section under regional anaesthesia as a predominantly positive experience. Most staff had a favourable attitude towards letting the partner be present for caesarean sections under regional anaesthesia.
Limited evidence exists regarding the presence of the partner during emergency caesarean sections, but is of low quality. Most parents prefer having their partner present. Staff can be reluctant, especially when general anaesthesia is used.
紧急剖宫产通常非常紧急,留给告知和指导父母的时间有限。是让伴侣留在手术室外面,还是让伴侣陪伴母亲?
本综述旨在提供有关在紧急剖宫产期间伴侣在手术室中存在的现有证据的概述。
范围综述。
在 PubMed、Embase、Cinahl 和 Cochrane Library 中进行了系统的文献检索。
所有报告在区域或全身麻醉下进行紧急剖宫产且伴侣在手术室中存在的已发表文献均符合条件,无论设计如何。
共纳入 24 篇标题,发表时间在 1984 年至 2020 年之间;其中 15 篇包含原始临床发现,9 篇为信件/辩论。使用混合方法评估工具评估证据质量,发现非常低/低(17 项研究)、中等(6 项)或良好(1 项)。研究来自欧洲(16 项)、美国/加拿大(4 项)、南美洲(2 项)、亚洲(1 项)和非洲(1 项)。内容数据进行了主题总结,总体上支持或反对伴侣在场。工作人员似乎不愿意让伴侣在全身麻醉下进行剖宫产;母亲和伴侣更喜欢伴侣的陪伴。在区域麻醉下,父母也希望伴侣在场,并将区域麻醉下的剖宫产描述为主要是积极的体验。大多数工作人员对让伴侣在区域麻醉下进行剖宫产持积极态度。
关于紧急剖宫产期间伴侣在场的证据有限,但质量较低。大多数父母希望伴侣在场。工作人员可能会不愿意,尤其是在使用全身麻醉的情况下。