Suppr超能文献

手术室到切口的时间间隔与急诊剖宫产新生儿结局的关系:一项回顾性 5 年队列研究。

Operating room-to-incision interval and neonatal outcome in emergency caesarean section: a retrospective 5-year cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, University College London Hospital, London, UK.

Division of Medicine, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 2018 Jul;73(7):825-831. doi: 10.1111/anae.14296. Epub 2018 Apr 6.

Abstract

We conducted a 5-year retrospective cohort study on women undergoing caesarean section to investigate factors influencing the operating room-to-incision interval. Time-to-event analysis was performed for category-1 caesarean section using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Covariates included: anaesthetic technique; body mass index; age; parity; time of delivery; and gestational age. Binary logistic regression was performed for 5-min Apgar score ≥ 7. There were 677 women who underwent category-1 caesarean section and who met the entry criteria. Unadjusted median (IQR [range]) operating room-to-incision intervals were: epidural top-up 11 (7-17 [0-87]) min; general anaesthesia 6 (4-11 [0-69]) min; spinal 13 (10-20 [0-83]) min; and combined spinal-epidural 24 (13-35 [0-75]) min. Cox regression showed general anaesthesia to be the most rapid method with a hazard ratio (95%CI) of 1.97 (1.60-2.44; p < 0.0001), followed by epidural top-up (reference group), spinal anaesthesia 0.79 (0.65-0.96; p = 0.02) and combined spinal-epidural 0.48 (0.35-0.67; p < 0.0001). Underweight and overweight body mass indexes were associated with longer operating room-to-incision intervals. General anaesthesia was associated with fewer 5-min Apgar scores ≥ 7 with an odds ratio (95%CI) of 0.28 (0.11-0.68; p < 0.01). There was no difference in neonatal outcomes between the first and fifth quintiles for operating room-to-incision intervals. General anaesthesia is associated with the most rapid operating room-to-incision interval for category-1 caesarean section, but is also associated with worse short term neonatal outcomes. Longer operating room-to-incision intervals were not associated with worse neonatal outcomes.

摘要

我们对行剖宫产术的妇女进行了一项为期 5 年的回顾性队列研究,以调查影响手术间至切口时间的因素。使用 Cox 比例风险回归模型对 1 类剖宫产进行时间事件分析。协变量包括:麻醉技术;体重指数;年龄;产次;分娩时间;和胎龄。5 分钟 Apgar 评分≥7 进行二项逻辑回归。有 677 名符合入组标准的 1 类剖宫产妇女。未调整的中位数(IQR [范围])手术间至切口时间为:硬膜外追加 11(7-17 [0-87])分钟;全身麻醉 6(4-11 [0-69])分钟;脊髓 13(10-20 [0-83])分钟;和联合脊髓-硬膜外 24(13-35 [0-75])分钟。Cox 回归显示全身麻醉是最快的方法,风险比(95%CI)为 1.97(1.60-2.44;p<0.0001),其次是硬膜外追加(参照组),脊髓麻醉 0.79(0.65-0.96;p=0.02)和联合脊髓-硬膜外麻醉 0.48(0.35-0.67;p<0.0001)。体重过轻和超重的体重指数与手术间至切口时间较长有关。全身麻醉与较少的 5 分钟 Apgar 评分≥7 相关,比值比(95%CI)为 0.28(0.11-0.68;p<0.01)。手术间至切口时间的第 1 个五分位数与第 5 个五分位数之间新生儿结局无差异。全身麻醉与 1 类剖宫产的手术间至切口时间最快,但也与短期新生儿结局较差有关。较长的手术间至切口时间与新生儿结局较差无关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验