Kettering General Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, UK.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023 May;105(5):469-475. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0109. Epub 2022 Oct 14.
This study aims to report on current practice in the management of radial head fractures (RHFs) in the United Kingdom and to review the literature to identify areas for future investigation.
A 12-question online survey was sent to 500 surgeon members of the British Elbow and Shoulder Society in 2021. Questions focused on clinical assessment, indications for surgical treatment and willingness to participate in future studies. Descriptive statistical analysis summarised the responses.
The response rate was 20.4% ( = 102). For minimally displaced RHFs, non-operative management with immediate mobilisation was reported by 90.2% ( = 92) as opposed to 9.8% ( = 10) for initial immobilisation in plaster or brace. The most cited indication for radial head arthroplasty as opposed to fixation was increased patient age or low functional demand in 69.9% of responses ( = 71). In total, 41.2% ( = 42) indicated the need for a future randomised controlled trial (RCT) concerning the management of RHF. Only five RCTs were returned by the literature review.
There is considerable variability in the management of RHF among an experienced cohort of surgeons. With the interest declared by the participating surgeons, there is a call for a well-designed sufficiently powered RCT.
本研究旨在报告英国目前在桡骨头骨折(RHF)管理方面的实践情况,并回顾文献,确定未来研究的方向。
2021 年,我们向英国肘肩学会的 500 名外科医生成员发送了一份 12 个问题的在线调查。问题集中在临床评估、手术治疗指征以及参与未来研究的意愿。描述性统计分析总结了答复。
回复率为 20.4%(=102)。对于轻度移位的 RHF,90.2%(=92)的医生选择非手术治疗,立即开始活动,而不是初始用石膏或支具固定 9.8%(=10)。69.9%(=71)的医生表示,相对于固定术,桡骨头置换术的最主要指征是患者年龄较大或功能需求较低。共有 41.2%(=42)的医生表示需要进行未来的关于 RHF 管理的随机对照试验(RCT)。文献回顾仅返回了 5 项 RCT。
在经验丰富的外科医生群体中,RHF 的治疗方法存在很大差异。考虑到参与研究的外科医生的兴趣,我们呼吁开展精心设计、充分有力的 RCT。