• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改良 Mason 型 III/IV 型桡骨头骨折伴三块以上骨折块的切开复位内固定:临床疗效及再次手术率分析。

Open reduction and internal fixation of modified Mason type III/IV radial head fractures with more than three fragments: an analysis of the clinical outcome and reoperation rate.

机构信息

University of Fribourg Medical School, Chemin du Musée, 1700, Fribourg, Switzerland.

Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Fribourg Cantonal Hospital, Chemin des Pensionnats 2-6, 1752, Villars-sur-Glâne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Feb;34(2):1121-1130. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03772-y. Epub 2023 Nov 14.

DOI:10.1007/s00590-023-03772-y
PMID:37962633
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10858131/
Abstract

PURPOSE

It is generally accepted that a radial head fracture (RHF) with more than three parts is not suitable for repair; therefore, most authors suggest straightforward radial head arthroplasty (RHA). With up to 20% risk for reoperation after RHA, improvement in reduction and fixation techniques may represent a valuable alternative before further extending the indications for arthroplasty. To determine the functional results and radiological failure rate after osteosynthesis of multi-fragmentary RHF with more than three articular fragments. We specifically determined (1) the one-year Broberg and Morrey functional elbow score, (2) duration of fracture healing, (3) complication rate, and (4) number of patients converted to RHA.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective single-center case series. All patients who underwent primary osteosynthesis for RHF between 2012 and 2019 were included. Nine patients with an average age of 52 years had an average clinical and/or radiological follow-up of 49 months.

RESULTS

The preoperative imaging identified nine fractures with four fragments. Three patients underwent osteosynthesis with plates and screws, whereas six patients underwent osteosynthesis with only screws. The mean Broberg and Morrey score was 95 points. Overall, eight of the nine patients had satisfactory results. All patients retained their radial heads and showed radiological fracture healing. Only two patients presented with low-grade complications requiring no further surgery.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that osteosynthesis of RHF with up to four fragments can achieve good functional results with a low complication rate and seems to be a valid alternative to RHA.

摘要

目的

人们普遍认为,超过三块的桡骨头骨折(RHF)不适合修复;因此,大多数作者建议直接行桡骨头置换术(RHA)。RHA 后有高达 20%的再手术风险,因此,在进一步扩大关节成形术的适应证之前,改进复位和固定技术可能是一种有价值的替代方法。本研究旨在确定三块以上关节内碎片的多片段 RHF 经骨愈合后的功能结果和放射学失败率。我们特别确定了(1)一年时 Broberg 和 Morrey 肘关节功能评分,(2)骨折愈合时间,(3)并发症发生率,和(4)转为 RHA 的患者数量。

方法

这是一项回顾性单中心病例系列研究。纳入了 2012 年至 2019 年间接受 RHF 切开复位内固定术的所有患者。9 例患者平均年龄 52 岁,平均临床和/或放射学随访 49 个月。

结果

术前影像学检查发现 9 例患者为 4 块骨折。3 例患者行钢板螺钉内固定,6 例患者仅行螺钉内固定。平均 Broberg 和 Morrey 评分为 95 分。总体而言,9 例患者中有 8 例结果满意。所有患者均保留了桡骨头,且影像学上均显示骨折愈合。仅有 2 例患者出现低度并发症,无需进一步手术。

结论

我们的研究表明,对于三块以内的桡骨头骨折,切开复位内固定可获得良好的功能结果,并发症发生率低,似乎是 RHA 的有效替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/758b/10858131/193f7b831851/590_2023_3772_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/758b/10858131/8892ad8cf6d0/590_2023_3772_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/758b/10858131/193f7b831851/590_2023_3772_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/758b/10858131/8892ad8cf6d0/590_2023_3772_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/758b/10858131/193f7b831851/590_2023_3772_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Open reduction and internal fixation of modified Mason type III/IV radial head fractures with more than three fragments: an analysis of the clinical outcome and reoperation rate.改良 Mason 型 III/IV 型桡骨头骨折伴三块以上骨折块的切开复位内固定:临床疗效及再次手术率分析。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Feb;34(2):1121-1130. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03772-y. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
2
Comparison between radial head arthroplasty and open reduction and internal fixation in patients with radial head fractures (modified Mason type III and IV): a meta-analysis.桡骨头骨折(改良Mason III型和IV型)患者行桡骨头置换术与切开复位内固定术的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2016 Apr;26(3):283-91. doi: 10.1007/s00590-016-1739-1. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
3
Open reduction and internal fixation versus radial head arthroplasty in the treatment of adult closed comminuted radial head fractures (modified Mason type III and IV).切开复位内固定术与桡骨头置换术治疗成人闭合性粉碎性桡骨头骨折(改良Mason III型和IV型)的比较
Int Orthop. 2015 Aug;39(8):1659-64. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2755-1. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
4
Fixation versus replacement of radial head in terrible triad: is there a difference in elbow stability and prognosis?桡骨头固定与置换治疗三联征:肘关节稳定性和预后是否存在差异?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jul;472(7):2128-35. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3331-x.
5
The outcomes of surgical treatment of complex radial head fractures.复杂桡骨头骨折的手术治疗结果。
Bone Joint J. 2024 Oct 1;106-B(10):1158-1164. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.106B10.BJJ-2024-0407.R1.
6
Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Simple Versus Comminuted Radial Head Fractures: Comparison of Clinical Outcomes.桡骨头简单骨折与粉碎性骨折的切开复位内固定:临床疗效比较。
J Hand Surg Am. 2023 Oct;48(10):1059.e1-1059.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.02.020. Epub 2022 May 8.
7
Open reduction and internal fixation of fractures of the radial head.桡骨头骨折的切开复位内固定术
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Oct;84(10):1811-5. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200210000-00011.
8
Mason type III radial head fractures treated by anatomic radial head arthroplasty: Is this a safe treatment option?采用解剖型桡骨头置换术治疗的梅森III型桡骨头骨折:这是一种安全的治疗选择吗?
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Apr;103(2):183-189. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.10.017. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
9
Open reduction and internal fixation with bone grafts for comminuted mason type II radial head fractures.采用植骨进行切开复位内固定治疗粉碎性Mason II型桡骨头骨折。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Aug 16;19(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2214-4.
10
Open reduction and internal fixation of radial head fractures: do outcomes differ between simple and complex injuries?桡骨头骨折切开复位内固定术:单纯损伤与复杂损伤的结果是否不同?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jul;472(7):2120-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3519-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and functional outcomes of plate and screw osteosynthesis in mason type III and IV radial head fractures in the absence of a radial head prosthesis.在无桡骨头假体情况下,采用钢板螺钉内固定治疗Mason III型和IV型桡骨头骨折的临床及功能结果
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 May 15;35(1):198. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04319-z.
2
Management of Elderly Elbow Fractures.老年肘部骨折的治疗
Indian J Orthop. 2025 Jan 29;59(3):358-367. doi: 10.1007/s43465-024-01331-z. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Analysis of Surgical Stabilization Results of Radial Head Fractures.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term outcomes of radial head arthroplasty for radial head fractures-a systematic review at minimum 8-year follow-up.桡骨头骨折行桡骨头置换术的长期疗效:至少 8 年随访的系统评价。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Oct;30(10):2438-2444. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.03.142. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
2
Factors influencing the mid-term radiological and functional outcomes of 41 post-fracture bipolar radial head arthroplasty cases at a mean follow-up of 87 months.41 例骨折后双极桡骨小头置换术后 87 个月平均随访时的中期影像学和功能结果的影响因素。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 Apr;107(2):102818. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102818. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
3
桡骨头骨折手术固定结果分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 17;14(4):1336. doi: 10.3390/jcm14041336.
4
Functional Outcomes of Radial Head Fractures Treated With Open Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF).切开复位内固定术(ORIF)治疗桡骨头骨折的功能预后
Cureus. 2024 Nov 29;16(11):e74801. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74801. eCollection 2024 Nov.
5
Which radial head fractures are best treated surgically?哪些桡骨头骨折采用手术治疗效果最佳?
EFORT Open Rev. 2024 May 10;9(5):413-421. doi: 10.1530/EOR-24-0035.
Evaluation of MoPyC-prosthesis implantation and the use of angular stable plates in the treatment of comminuted radial head fractures.
MoPyC假体植入及角稳定钢板在治疗粉碎性桡骨头骨折中的应用评估。
J Orthop. 2019 Mar 25;16(4):269-274. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.02.031. eCollection 2019 Jul-Aug.
4
Maximizing outcomes in the treatment of radial head fractures.最大限度提高桡骨头骨折治疗效果。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2019 Mar 23;20(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s10195-019-0523-5.
5
Primary cemented bipolar radial head prostheses for acute elbow injuries with comminuted radial head fractures: mid-term results of 37 patients.用于急性肘关节损伤伴桡骨头粉碎性骨折的初次骨水泥固定双极桡骨头假体:37例患者的中期结果
Musculoskelet Surg. 2019 Apr;103(1):91-97. doi: 10.1007/s12306-018-0576-2. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
6
The Best Option in Treatment of Modified Mason Type III Radial Head Fractures: Open Reduction and Internal Fixation Versus Radial Head Excision.改良MasonⅢ型桡骨头骨折的最佳治疗选择:切开复位内固定与桡骨头切除术的对比
Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2018 Sep;6(5):365-370.
7
Radial head replacement with a bipolar system: an average 10-year follow-up.双极系统行桡骨头置换术:平均 10 年随访结果。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Feb;27(2):e38-e44. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.09.015. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
8
Using an anatomically preshaped low-profile locking plate system leads to reliable results in comminuted radial head fractures.使用解剖预塑形的低剖面锁定钢板系统治疗粉碎性桡骨头骨折可取得可靠的效果。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017 Jun;137(6):789-795. doi: 10.1007/s00402-017-2693-z. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
9
Comparison between radial head arthroplasty and open reduction and internal fixation in patients with radial head fractures (modified Mason type III and IV): a meta-analysis.桡骨头骨折(改良Mason III型和IV型)患者行桡骨头置换术与切开复位内固定术的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2016 Apr;26(3):283-91. doi: 10.1007/s00590-016-1739-1. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
10
Outcomes using the extensor digitorum communis splitting approach for the treatment of radial head fractures.采用指总伸肌劈开入路治疗桡骨头骨折的疗效。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Feb;25(2):276-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.09.030. Epub 2015 Dec 2.