• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情期间政府政策应对措施对澳大利亚公司股票市场流动性的影响。

Impact of government policy responses of COVID-19 pandemic on stock market liquidity for Australian companies.

作者信息

Kassamany Talie, Zgheib Bernard

机构信息

Notre Dame University-Louaize Zouk Mosbeh Lebanon.

出版信息

Aust Econ Pap. 2022 Oct 2. doi: 10.1111/1467-8454.12280.

DOI:10.1111/1467-8454.12280
PMID:36246775
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9539034/
Abstract

This study investigates the impact of government policy responses of COVID-19 pandemic on stock market liquidity for listed Australian companies and for 11 different industries separately. A quantitative deductive approach is used for a sample of 1,452 companies with a total of 292,164 firm-day observations over a period from January 25, 2020 to December 31, 2020 during the outbreak of COVID-19. Univariate and multivariate (two-way cluster-robust panel regression) analysis were conducted. Data were collected from the Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker, Worldmeter, Refinitiv Workspace and Datastream. Our findings indicate that the influences of the six out of seven stringency policy responses reduced Australian equity market liquidity. However, public information campaigns enhanced market liquidity and hence trading activity. Among the 11 industries, our analysis shows that the non-pharmaceutical interventions by the Australian government have significant and positive effects on four industries: Consumer non-cyclicals, healthcare, financial and technology. However, the worse effects were depicted in the industrial (transportation) and energy industries. This study is important for investors, policymakers and regulators to understand the diverse effects of government policy responses of COVID-19 on stock market liquidity to enhance financial stability. Moreover, understanding this effect is particularly important to decision-makers such as portfolio and fund managers to manage their portfolios and trading activities during extreme turbulence times, such as COVID-19. Unlike previous studies that focus on country analysis, this study examines on firm basis the impact of government interventions on stock market liquidity in a well developed Australian stock market.

摘要

本研究分别调查了澳大利亚政府针对新冠疫情的政策应对措施对澳大利亚上市公司以及11个不同行业股票市场流动性的影响。采用定量演绎法,以1452家公司为样本,在2020年1月25日至2020年12月31日新冠疫情爆发期间,共获得292,164个公司日观测值。进行了单变量和多变量(双向聚类稳健面板回归)分析。数据收集自牛津新冠疫情政府应对追踪器、世界计量网站、路孚特工作区和数据流。我们的研究结果表明,七项严格政策应对措施中的六项降低了澳大利亚股票市场的流动性。然而,公共信息宣传活动提高了市场流动性,从而促进了交易活动。在11个行业中,我们的分析表明,澳大利亚政府的非药物干预措施对四个行业有显著的积极影响:非周期性消费、医疗保健、金融和科技。然而,工业(运输)和能源行业受到的负面影响更为明显。本研究对于投资者、政策制定者和监管机构理解政府针对新冠疫情的政策应对措施对股票市场流动性的不同影响以增强金融稳定性具有重要意义。此外,了解这种影响对于投资组合和基金经理等决策者在极端动荡时期(如新冠疫情期间)管理其投资组合和交易活动尤为重要。与以往侧重于国家分析的研究不同,本研究在澳大利亚发达股票市场的公司层面上考察了政府干预对股票市场流动性的影响。

相似文献

1
Impact of government policy responses of COVID-19 pandemic on stock market liquidity for Australian companies.新冠疫情期间政府政策应对措施对澳大利亚公司股票市场流动性的影响。
Aust Econ Pap. 2022 Oct 2. doi: 10.1111/1467-8454.12280.
2
COVID-19, government policy responses, and stock market liquidity around the world: A note.《2019冠状病毒病、全球政府政策应对措施与股票市场流动性:一则说明》
Res Int Bus Finance. 2021 Apr;56:101359. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101359. Epub 2020 Dec 4.
3
Measuring liquidity in Indian stock market: A dimensional perspective.印度股票市场流动性的衡量:一个维度的视角。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 4;15(9):e0238718. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238718. eCollection 2020.
4
Herding behavior and government policy responses: Evidence from COVID-19 effect.羊群行为与政府政策应对:来自新冠疫情影响的证据
Heliyon. 2023 Jul 5;9(7):e17964. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17964. eCollection 2023 Jul.
5
Impact of liquidity spillovers among industrial sectors on stock markets during crisis periods: Evidence from the S&P 500 index.工业部门之间的流动性溢出对危机期间股票市场的影响:来自标准普尔 500 指数的证据。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 17;17(11):e0277261. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277261. eCollection 2022.
6
Does COVID-19-specific news affect stock market liquidity? Evidence from Japan.特定于新冠疫情的新闻会影响股票市场流动性吗?来自日本的证据。
MethodsX. 2023 Sep 4;11:102360. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2023.102360. eCollection 2023 Dec.
7
Impact of government interventions on the stock market during COVID-19: a case study in Indonesia.新冠疫情期间政府干预对股票市场的影响:以印度尼西亚为例
SN Bus Econ. 2022;2(9):136. doi: 10.1007/s43546-022-00312-4. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
8
Enterprise digital transformation's impact on stock liquidity: A corporate governance perspective.企业数字化转型对股票流动性的影响:公司治理视角。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 20;19(3):e0293818. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293818. eCollection 2024.
9
Does non-fundamental news related to COVID-19 matter for stock returns? Evidence from Shanghai stock market.与新冠疫情相关的非基本面新闻对股票回报有影响吗?来自上海股票市场的证据。
Econ Model. 2021 Jun;99:105484. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2021.03.003. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
10
The Effect of ESG performance on the stock market during the COVID-19 Pandemic - Evidence from Japan.新冠疫情期间环境、社会和治理(ESG)绩效对日本股票市场的影响——来自日本的证据
Econ Anal Policy. 2023 Jun 28. doi: 10.1016/j.eap.2023.06.038.

本文引用的文献

1
Searching for safe-haven assets during the COVID-19 pandemic.在新冠疫情期间寻找避险资产。
Int Rev Financ Anal. 2020 Oct;71:101526. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101526. Epub 2020 May 23.
2
Stock prices and geographic proximity of information: Evidence from the Ebola outbreak.股价与信息的地理接近度:来自埃博拉疫情的证据。
Int Rev Financ Anal. 2018 Mar;56:153-166. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2017.12.004. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
3
The contagion effects of the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from gold and cryptocurrencies.新冠疫情的传染效应:来自黄金和加密货币的证据。
Financ Res Lett. 2020 Jul;35:101554. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101554. Epub 2020 May 14.
4
The COVID-19 outbreak and stock market reactions: Evidence from Australia.新冠疫情与股市反应:来自澳大利亚的证据。
Financ Res Lett. 2021 Jan;38:101832. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101832. Epub 2020 Nov 6.
5
COVID-19 social distancing and the US service sector: What do we learn?新冠疫情下的社交距离措施与美国服务业:我们能学到什么?
Res Int Bus Finance. 2021 Apr;56:101361. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101361. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
6
Stock market reactions to COVID-19 lockdown: A global analysis.股票市场对新冠疫情封锁措施的反应:一项全球分析。
Financ Res Lett. 2022 Mar;45:102245. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2021.102245. Epub 2021 Jun 20.
7
COVID-19 and airline employment: Insights from historical uncertainty shocks to the industry.新冠疫情与航空业就业:从该行业历史不确定性冲击中获得的见解
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020 May;5:100123. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100123. Epub 2020 May 1.
8
Stock markets' reaction to COVID-19: Cases or fatalities?股票市场对新冠疫情的反应:病例还是死亡人数?
Res Int Bus Finance. 2020 Dec;54:101249. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101249. Epub 2020 May 23.
9
COVID-19 outbreak and sectoral performance of the Australian stock market: An event study analysis.新冠疫情与澳大利亚股票市场的行业表现:一项事件研究分析。
Aust Econ Pap. 2021 Sep;60(3):482-495. doi: 10.1111/1467-8454.12215. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
10
COVID-19, government policy responses, and stock market liquidity around the world: A note.《2019冠状病毒病、全球政府政策应对措施与股票市场流动性:一则说明》
Res Int Bus Finance. 2021 Apr;56:101359. doi: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101359. Epub 2020 Dec 4.