Pavlova Marina A, Romagnano Valentina, Kubon Julian, Isernia Sara, Fallgatter Andreas J, Sokolov Alexander N
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), Medical School and University Hospital, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, Milan, Italy.
Front Neurosci. 2022 Sep 28;16:997263. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.997263. eCollection 2022.
While reading covered with masks faces during the COVID-19 pandemic, for efficient social interaction, we need to combine information from different sources such as the eyes (without faces hidden by masks) and bodies. This may be challenging for individuals with neuropsychiatric conditions, in particular, autism spectrum disorders. Here we examined whether reading of dynamic faces, bodies, and eyes are tied in a gender-specific way, and how these capabilities are related to autistic traits expression. Females and males accomplished a task with point-light faces along with a task with point-light body locomotion portraying different emotional expressions. They had to infer emotional content of displays. In addition, participants were administered the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test, modified and Autism Spectrum Quotient questionnaire. The findings show that only in females, inferring emotions from dynamic bodies and faces are firmly linked, whereas in males, reading in the eyes is knotted with face reading. Strikingly, in neurotypical males only, accuracy of face, body, and eyes reading was negatively tied with autistic traits. The outcome points to gender-specific modes in social cognition: females rely upon merely dynamic cues while reading faces and bodies, whereas males most likely trust configural information. The findings are of value for examination of face and body language reading in neuropsychiatric conditions, in particular, autism, most of which are gender/sex-specific. This work suggests that if male individuals with autistic traits experience difficulties in reading covered with masks faces, these deficits may be unlikely compensated by reading (even dynamic) bodies and faces. By contrast, in females, reading covered faces as well as reading language of dynamic bodies and faces are not compulsorily connected to autistic traits preventing them from paying high costs for maladaptive social interaction.
在新冠疫情期间阅读戴着口罩的面孔时,为了实现高效的社交互动,我们需要整合来自不同来源的信息,比如眼睛(面部未被口罩遮挡时)和身体。对于患有神经精神疾病的个体,尤其是自闭症谱系障碍患者而言,这可能具有挑战性。在此,我们研究了动态面孔、身体和眼睛的阅读是否以特定性别的方式相互关联,以及这些能力与自闭症特征表达之间的关系。男性和女性完成了一项关于光点面孔的任务,以及一项关于描绘不同情感表达的光点身体运动的任务。他们必须推断展示内容的情感含义。此外,参与者还接受了修改后的《读心术眼测试》和《自闭症谱系商数问卷》。研究结果表明,只有女性能够将从动态身体和面孔中推断情绪紧密联系起来,而男性则是眼睛阅读与面部阅读相关联。值得注意的是,只有在神经典型男性中,面部、身体和眼睛阅读的准确性与自闭症特征呈负相关。这一结果表明了社交认知中特定性别的模式:女性在阅读面孔和身体时仅依赖动态线索,而男性则最有可能依赖构型信息。这些发现对于研究神经精神疾病,尤其是自闭症中的面部和身体语言阅读具有重要价值,其中大多数疾病具有性别特异性。这项研究表明,如果具有自闭症特征的男性个体在阅读戴口罩的面孔时遇到困难,这些缺陷不太可能通过阅读(即使是动态的)身体和面孔来弥补。相比之下,在女性中,阅读被遮盖的面孔以及动态身体和面孔的语言与自闭症特征没有必然联系,这使得她们不会因适应不良的社交互动而付出高昂代价。