Pavlova Marina A, Moosavi Jonas, Carbon Claus-Christian, Fallgatter Andreas J, Sokolov Alexander N
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), Medical School and University Hospital, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Department of General Psychology and Methodology, University of Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany.
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2023 Sep 14;9(1):58. doi: 10.1038/s41537-023-00388-3.
The impact of face masks on social cognition and interaction became a popular topic due to the long-lasting COVID-19 pandemic. This theme persists in the focus of attention beyond the pandemic, since face covering not only reduces the overall amount of face information available but also introduces biases and prejudices affecting social perception at large. Many questions are still open. One of them is whether gender of beholders affects inferring of emotions covered by face masks. Reading covered faces may be particularly challenging for individuals with mental disorders, most of which are gender-specific. Previous findings are not only sparse, but inconclusive because most research had been conducted online with resulting samples heavily dominated by females. Here in a face-to-face study, females and males were presented with a randomized set of faces covered by masks. In a two-alternative forced-choice paradigm, participants had to indicate facial emotions displayed by posers. In general, the outcome dovetails with earlier findings that face masks affect emotion recognition in a dissimilar way: Inferring some emotions suffers more severely than others, with the most pronounced influence of mask wearing on disgust and close to ceiling recognition of fear and neutral expressions. Contrary to our expectations, however, males were on overall more proficient in emotion recognition. In particular, males substantially excelled in inferring disgust. The findings help to understand gender differences in recognition of disgust, the forgotten emotion of psychiatry, that is of substantial value for a wide range of mental disorders including schizophrenia. Watch Prof. Marina Pavlova discussing this her work and this article: https://vimeo.com/860126397/5966610f49?share=copy .
由于长期的新冠疫情,口罩对社会认知和互动的影响成为一个热门话题。即使在疫情之后,这个主题仍然是人们关注的焦点,因为面部遮盖不仅减少了可用的面部信息总量,还引入了影响整体社会认知的偏见。许多问题仍然悬而未决。其中之一是观察者的性别是否会影响对口罩所遮盖情绪的推断。对于患有精神疾病的个体来说,解读被遮盖的面部可能特别具有挑战性,而其中大多数精神疾病都具有性别特异性。先前的研究结果不仅稀少,而且没有定论,因为大多数研究都是在网上进行的,导致样本中女性占主导地位。在这项面对面研究中,向女性和男性展示了一组随机的戴口罩面部图像。在二选一的强制选择范式中,参与者必须指出模特所展示的面部情绪。总体而言,结果与早期研究结果一致,即口罩以不同的方式影响情绪识别:推断某些情绪比其他情绪受到的影响更严重,戴口罩对厌恶情绪的影响最为明显,而对恐惧和中性表情的识别接近上限。然而,与我们的预期相反,总体而言男性在情绪识别方面更熟练。特别是,男性在推断厌恶情绪方面表现出色。这些发现有助于理解在厌恶情绪识别方面的性别差异,厌恶情绪是精神病学中被忽视的情绪,对包括精神分裂症在内的广泛精神疾病具有重要价值。观看玛丽娜·帕夫洛娃教授讨论她的这项工作和这篇文章:https://vimeo.com/860126397/5966610f49?share=copy 。