Hao Xiaowei, Lai Wenhui, Xia Xinze, Xu Junnan, Wu Yangyang, Lv Chao, Lv Kaikai, Huang Shuai, Luo Zhenjun, Meng Qingyang, Yuan Qing, Dong Jun
Department of Urology, The Third Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Department of Postgraduate, Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou, China.
Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 29;12:955771. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.955771. eCollection 2022.
The incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) caused by renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is increasing with the high prevalence of RCC as well as those with treatment-related renal function impairment. Worries about tumor recurrence after transplant-related immunosuppression hinder the recommendation of kidney transplantation for RCC-induced ESRD patients. However, no direct analysis has been performed to identify whether kidney transplantation can offer better survival than maintaining dialysis.
This retrospective population-based cohort study was based on Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data released in March 2021. Characteristics and outcomes were compared, including the patient and graft survival of candidates and recipients with RCC-induced ESRD etiology as well as other primary diseases.
Patients with RCC-induced ESRD were older; more likely to be male, White, and obese; and more likely to have a history of diabetes and dialysis. They also had higher creatinine levels, more delayed graft function, more primary non-function, and higher Kidney Donor Profile Index score donors, compared with the glomerulonephritis (GN) group. While waiting, RCC candidates suffered the worst outcomes of all groups, a 44% (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.44 [1.27-1.62]) higher risk of removal than GN patients. After transplantation, RCC recipients demonstrated comparable patient survival and better graft survival (p=0.21 and p=0.13, respectively). Compared with still-waiting RCC patients, the RCC recipients who received kidney transplants had significantly better outcomes (13.6 [9.3-17.8] vs. 61 [52-68.4] %), decreasing the death or deteriorating risk by 84% (aHR, 0.16 [0.13-0.20]).
Patients with RCC-induced ESRD can dramatically benefit from kidney transplantation. Hence, these patients should not be limited to transplantation by strict strategies or a delayed waiting time out of their malignancy history.
随着肾细胞癌(RCC)的高发病率以及与治疗相关的肾功能损害患者数量的增加,由肾细胞癌引起的终末期肾病(ESRD)的发病率正在上升。对移植相关免疫抑制后肿瘤复发的担忧阻碍了对RCC诱导的ESRD患者进行肾移植的推荐。然而,尚未进行直接分析以确定肾移植是否能提供比维持透析更好的生存率。
这项基于人群的回顾性队列研究基于2021年3月发布的器官获取与移植网络数据。比较了特征和结果,包括RCC诱导的ESRD病因以及其他原发性疾病的候选者和接受者的患者和移植物存活率。
RCC诱导的ESRD患者年龄更大;更有可能是男性、白人且肥胖;更有可能有糖尿病和透析史。与肾小球肾炎(GN)组相比,他们的肌酐水平更高,移植肾功能延迟更多,原发性无功能更多,肾供体概况指数评分更高。在等待期间,RCC候选者的结局是所有组中最差的,被移除的风险比GN患者高44%(调整后风险比[aHR],1.44[1.27 - 1.62])。移植后,RCC接受者的患者生存率相当,移植物生存率更好(分别为p = 0.21和p = 0.13)。与仍在等待的RCC患者相比,接受肾移植的RCC接受者的结局明显更好(13.6[9.3 - 17.8]%对61[52 - 68.4]%),死亡或病情恶化风险降低了84%(aHR,0.16[0.13 - 0.20])。
RCC诱导的ESRD患者可从肾移植中显著获益。因此,不应因严格的策略或因其恶性肿瘤病史而延迟等待时间而限制这些患者进行移植。