Suppr超能文献

血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂与癌症风险:观察性研究的最新荟萃分析

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers and cancer risk: an updated meta-analysis of observational studies.

作者信息

Shin Kayeong, Yang Jiwoo, Yu Yeuni, Son Eunjeong, Kim Kihun, Kim Yun Hak

机构信息

Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Pusan National University, Busan, Republic of Korea.

Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2022 Oct 10;13:20420986221129335. doi: 10.1177/20420986221129335. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Debate on the association between the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and the risk of developing cancer has been ongoing for decades. This study aimed to generate reliable results by analysing observational studies published in the decade after our last meta-analysis was conducted.

METHODS

We searched Embase and Medline databases on 21 January 2021 for cohort and case-control studies. Two researchers independently reviewed the literature and assessed the title and abstract of each publication. The I2 statistic used to evaluate the heterogeneity of the effect measures. Risk of bias was qualitatively assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

We included an additional 16 cohort, 6 nested case-control, and 9 conventional case-control studies in the updated analysis. Overall HRs decreased, while overall relative risks increased.

CONCLUSION

Our results show some protective effects through the hazard ratio and some detrimental effects through the relative risk. Large-scale investigations of cohorts followed up for decades are needed to clarify association.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Two types of drug, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), have been linked to the risk of developing cancer. We performed a meta-analysis by aggregating individual studies looking into the cancer risk of ACEIs and ARBs. We searched for articles on Embase and Medline databases until 21 January, 2021. Two researchers independently reviewed the literature and assessed the title and abstract of each publication. Overall, the hazard ratio showed less than 1, while the relative risks showed higher than 1. Our results show some protective effects through the hazard ratio and some detrimental effects through the relative risk. Evidence supporting the risk of developing cancer is insufficient to prevent prescribing ACEIs or ARBs for patients with high blood pressure.

摘要

引言

关于使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)与患癌风险之间的关联争论已持续数十年。本研究旨在通过分析在我们上次进行荟萃分析后的十年间发表的观察性研究来得出可靠结果。

方法

我们于2021年1月21日在Embase和Medline数据库中检索队列研究和病例对照研究。两名研究人员独立查阅文献并评估每份出版物的标题和摘要。使用I²统计量评估效应量的异质性。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表对偏倚风险进行定性评估。

结果与讨论

在更新分析中,我们纳入了另外16项队列研究、6项巢式病例对照研究和9项传统病例对照研究。总体风险比降低,而总体相对风险增加。

结论

我们的结果通过风险比显示出一些保护作用,通过相对风险显示出一些有害作用。需要对队列进行数十年的大规模随访调查以阐明关联。

通俗易懂的总结

两种药物,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB),与患癌风险有关。我们通过汇总研究ACEI和ARB癌症风险的个体研究进行了一项荟萃分析。我们在Embase和Medline数据库中检索截至2021年1月21日的文章。两名研究人员独立查阅文献并评估每份出版物的标题和摘要。总体而言,风险比小于1,而相对风险大于1。我们的结果通过风险比显示出一些保护作用,通过相对风险显示出一些有害作用。支持患癌风险的证据不足以阻止为高血压患者开具ACEI或ARB。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed2a/9554114/388eb833282e/10.1177_20420986221129335-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验