Ochieng Lawrence O, Ogendo Joshua O, Bett Philip K, Nyaanga Jane G, Cheruiyot Erick K, Mulwa Richard M S, Arnold Sarah E J, Belmain Steven R, Stevenson Philip C
Department of Crops, Horticulture and Soils Egerton University Njoro Kenya.
Department of Biological Sciences Egerton University Njoro Kenya.
J Appl Entomol. 2022 Aug;146(7):838-849. doi: 10.1111/jen.13023. Epub 2022 May 20.
Botanical insecticides offer an environmentally benign insect pest management option for field crops with reduced impacts on natural enemies of pests and pollinators while botanically rich field margins can augment their abundance. Here, we evaluated the non-target effects on natural enemies and pest control efficacy on bean aphids in Lablab of three neem- and pyrethrum-based botanical insecticides (Pyerin75EC®, Nimbecidine® and Pyeneem 20EC®) and determine the influence of florally rich field margin vegetation on the recovery of beneficial insects after treatment. The botanical insecticides were applied at the early and late vegetative growth stages. Data were collected on aphids (abundance, damage severity and percent incidence) and natural enemy (abundance) both at pre-spraying and post-spraying alongside Lablab bean yield. The efficacy of botanical insecticides was similar to a synthetic pesticide control and reduced aphid abundance by 88% compared with the untreated control. However, the number of natural enemies was 34% higher in botanical insecticide-treated plots than in plots treated with synthetic insecticide indicating that plant-based treatments were less harmful to beneficial insects. The presence of field margin vegetation increased further the number of parasitic wasps and tachinid flies by 16% and 20%, respectively. This indicated that non-crop habitats can enhance recovery in beneficial insect populations and that botanical insecticides integrate effectively with conservation biological control strategies. Higher grain yields of 2.55-3.04 and 2.95-3.23 t/ha were recorded for both botanical insecticide and synthetic insecticide in the presence of florally enhanced field margins in consecutive cropping seasons. Overall, these data demonstrated that commercial botanical insecticides together with florally rich field margins offer an integrated, environmentally benign and sustainable alternative to synthetic insecticides for insect pest management and increased productivity of the orphan crop legume, Lablab.
植物源杀虫剂为大田作物提供了一种环境友好型害虫管理选择,对害虫天敌和传粉者的影响较小,而富含植物的田边可以增加它们的数量。在此,我们评估了三种基于印楝和除虫菊的植物源杀虫剂(Pyerin75EC®、Nimbecidine®和Pyeneem 20EC®)对豆科作物天敌的非靶标效应以及对豆蚜的防治效果,并确定了富含花卉的田边植被对处理后有益昆虫恢复的影响。植物源杀虫剂在营养生长早期和晚期施用。在喷雾前和喷雾后收集蚜虫(数量、危害严重程度和发病率)和天敌(数量)的数据,同时记录豆科作物的产量。植物源杀虫剂的效果与合成农药对照相似,与未处理对照相比,蚜虫数量减少了88%。然而,植物源杀虫剂处理地块中的天敌数量比合成杀虫剂处理地块中的天敌数量高34%,这表明基于植物的处理对有益昆虫的危害较小。田边植被的存在使寄生蜂和寄蝇的数量分别进一步增加了16%和20%。这表明非作物生境可以促进有益昆虫种群的恢复,并且植物源杀虫剂可以有效地与保护生物防治策略相结合。在连续种植季节中,在花卉增强的田边存在的情况下,植物源杀虫剂和合成杀虫剂的谷物产量均较高,分别为2.55-3.04吨/公顷和2.95-3.23吨/公顷。总体而言,这些数据表明,商业植物源杀虫剂与富含花卉的田边相结合,为害虫管理和提高孤儿作物豆科作物的生产力提供了一种综合、环境友好且可持续的合成杀虫剂替代品。