Jain Mamta K, De Lemos James A, McGuire Darren K, Ayers Colby, Eitson Jennifer L, Sanchez Claudia L, Kamel Dena, Meisner Jessica A, Thomas Emilia V, Hegde Anita A, Mocherla Satish, Strebe Joslyn K, Li Xilong, Williams Noelle S, Xing Chao, Ahmed Mahmoud S, Wang Ping, Sadek Hesham A, Schoggins John W
Department of Internal Medicine/Infectious Diseases, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.
Parkland Health and Hospital System, Dallas, TX, United States.
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Sep 30;13:1020123. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1020123. eCollection 2022.
An screen was performed to identify FDA approved drugs that inhibit SARS-CoV-2 main protease (M), followed by viral replication assays, and pharmacokinetic studies in mice. These studies identified atovaquone as a promising candidate for inhibiting viral replication. A 2-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed among patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection. Enrolled patients were randomized 2:1 to atovaquone 1500 mg BID matched placebo. Patients received standard of care treatment including remdesivir, dexamethasone, or convalescent plasma as deemed necessary by the treating team. Saliva was collected at baseline and twice per day for up to 10 days for RNA extraction for SARS-CoV-2 viral load measurement by quantitative reverse-transcriptase PCR. The primary outcome was the between group difference in log-transformed viral load (copies/mL) using a generalized linear mixed-effect models of repeated measures from all samples. Of the 61 patients enrolled; 41 received atovaquone and 19 received placebo. Overall, the population was predominately male (63%) and Hispanic (70%), with a mean age of 51 years, enrolled a mean of 5 days from symptom onset. The log viral load was 5.25 copies/mL . 4.79 copies/mL at baseline in the atovaquone . placebo group. Change in viral load did not differ over time between the atovaquone plus standard of care arm the placebo plus standard of care arm. Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies of atovaquone plasma concentration demonstrated a wide variation in atovaquone levels, with an inverse correlation between BMI and atovaquone levels, (Rho -0.45, = 0.02). In post hoc analysis, an inverse correlation was observed between atovaquone levels and viral load (Rho -0.54, = 0.005). In this prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, atovaquone did not demonstrate evidence of enhanced SARS-CoV-2 viral clearance compared with placebo. However, based on the observed inverse correlation between atovaquone levels and viral load, additional PK-guided studies may be warranted to examine the antiviral effect of atovaquone in COVID-19 patients.
进行了一项筛选,以确定美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的可抑制严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)主要蛋白酶(M)的药物,随后进行了病毒复制试验以及在小鼠身上的药代动力学研究。这些研究确定阿托伐醌是抑制病毒复制的一个有前景的候选药物。在因新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)感染住院的患者中进行了一项2中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。入组患者按2:1随机分为阿托伐醌1500毫克每日两次组和匹配的安慰剂组。患者接受由治疗团队视情况而定的标准治疗,包括瑞德西韦、地塞米松或康复期血浆。在基线时以及每天两次,持续长达10天收集唾液用于RNA提取,通过定量逆转录聚合酶链反应测量SARS-CoV-2病毒载量。主要结局是使用来自所有样本的重复测量的广义线性混合效应模型,两组之间对数转换后的病毒载量(拷贝/毫升)的差异。在61名入组患者中;41名接受阿托伐醌治疗,19名接受安慰剂治疗。总体而言,该人群主要为男性(63%)和西班牙裔(70%),平均年龄51岁,从症状出现起平均5天入组。阿托伐醌组和安慰剂组基线时的对数病毒载量分别为5.25拷贝/毫升和4.79拷贝/毫升。阿托伐醌加标准治疗组与安慰剂加标准治疗组之间病毒载量随时间的变化没有差异。阿托伐醌血浆浓度的药代动力学(PK)研究表明阿托伐醌水平存在很大差异,体重指数(BMI)与阿托伐醌水平呈负相关(相关系数-0.45,P = 0.02)。在事后分析中,观察到阿托伐醌水平与病毒载量之间呈负相关(相关系数-0.54,P = 0.005)。在这项前瞻性、随机、安慰剂对照试验中,与安慰剂相比,阿托伐醌未显示出增强SARS-CoV-2病毒清除的证据。然而,基于观察到的阿托伐醌水平与病毒载量之间的负相关,可能有必要进行额外的PK指导研究,以检查阿托伐醌在COVID-19患者中的抗病毒作用。