Cai Changjing, Luo Qingqing, Liu Yihan, Peng Yinghui, Zhang Xiangyang, Jiang Zhaohui, Feng Ziyang, Qi Yaru, Gao Yan, Liu Yongting, Liu Ping, Chen Yihong, Guo Cao, Shen Hong, Zeng Shan, Han Ying
Department of Oncology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Sep 30;13:1015510. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1015510. eCollection 2022.
There are many treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Among them, uncertainty remains especially concerning the clinical benefit of different regimens for left-sided RAS wild-type (WT) mCRC in the triple-drug therapy era. No studies have been conducted to answer this critical clinical issue. We performed a comprehensive analysis of published data and real-world data. First, we conducted analyses of the published trials to show the landscape of efficacy and safety in the treatments of left-sided RAS WT mCRC. Then, we initiated a multicenter real-world study as the validation dataset. This study included six published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and a total of 1925 patients. The double-drug regimen plus cetuximab/panitumumab (D + C/P) achieved the longest overall survival (OS) in patients with left-sided mCRC (HR = 0.74, 95%CI: 0.57-0.98), while triple-drug regimen with bevacizumab (T + B, HR = 1.1, 95%CI: 0.63-2.0), compared with double-drug with bevacizumab (D + B). The D + C/P had the highest overall response rate (ORR) in patients with left-sided mCRC (OR = 1.8, 95%CI: 0.89-3.8), while T + B (OR = 1.8, 95%CI: 0.70-4.8), compared with D + B. The multicenter real-world cohort showed the double-drug regimen plus cetuximab had longer progression-free survival (PFS) in left-sided mCRC patients than the triple-drug regimen with bevacizumab. The safety analysis showed the incidence of the adverse events (grade≥3) in the triple-drug therapy plus bevacizumab was higher than that in the double-drug therapy plus cetuximab/panitumumab. This work demonstrates the ranking of three regimens for therapeutic efficacy and safety in patients with left-sided RAS WT mCRC. The double-drug regimen plus cetuximab/panitumumab appears more effective and safer than double-drug and triple-drug based regimens with bevacizumab. Further trials and cohort analyses on this topic would increase confidence in these results.
转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)有多种治疗方法。其中,在三药联合治疗时代,对于左侧RAS野生型(WT)mCRC的不同治疗方案的临床获益仍存在不确定性。尚未有研究来回答这一关键的临床问题。我们对已发表的数据和真实世界数据进行了全面分析。首先,我们对已发表的试验进行分析,以展示左侧RAS WT mCRC治疗中的疗效和安全性情况。然后,我们启动了一项多中心真实世界研究作为验证数据集。该研究纳入了6项已发表的随机对照试验(RCT),共1925例患者。在左侧mCRC患者中,双药方案加西妥昔单抗/帕尼单抗(D + C/P)的总生存期(OS)最长(HR = 0.74,95%CI:0.57 - 0.98),而与双药加贝伐单抗(D + B)相比,含贝伐单抗的三药方案(T + B,HR = 1.1,95%CI:0.63 - 2.0)。在左侧mCRC患者中,D + C/P的总缓解率(ORR)最高(OR = 1.8,95%CI:0.89 - 3.8),而与D + B相比,T + B(OR = 1.8,95%CI:0.70 - 4.8)。多中心真实世界队列研究表明,在左侧mCRC患者中,双药方案加西妥昔单抗的无进展生存期(PFS)比含贝伐单抗的三药方案更长。安全性分析显示,三药联合加贝伐单抗治疗中不良事件(≥3级)的发生率高于双药联合加西妥昔单抗/帕尼单抗。这项工作展示了左侧RAS WT mCRC患者三种治疗方案在疗效和安全性方面的排名。双药方案加西妥昔单抗/帕尼单抗似乎比基于贝伐单抗的双药和三药方案更有效、更安全。关于这一主题的进一步试验和队列分析将增加对这些结果的信心。