• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们能信任信任度的衡量标准吗?对欧盟新闻媒体信任度的测量不变性。

Can we trust measures of trust? Measurement invariance in trust in EU news media.

作者信息

Sapir Eliyahu V

机构信息

Department of Political Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

SN Soc Sci. 2022;2(10):226. doi: 10.1007/s43545-022-00534-1. Epub 2022 Oct 7.

DOI:10.1007/s43545-022-00534-1
PMID:36250189
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9540139/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Trust in the news media received wide scholarly attention for almost a century, which was further boosted as a result of recent developments in the media landscape and changes in how news is made and consumed. Despite that, the conceptualization of trust in the news media is still debated, and its measurement comparability has not yet been established. In this paper, I build up on earlier conceptualizations of trust in the news media, and test three theoretically derived measurement models to determine their cross-cultural equivalence in 28 EU countries. Using Eurobarometer data, I test the validity and comparability of these measurements employing multi-group confirmatory factor analysis. The findings indicate that trust is a unidimensional latent construct, equally interpreted across contexts. People's level of trust in the news media reflects their general attitude to the news stories and reporters in all sources of media they are exposed to. While bifactorial measurements of news media trust, differentiating between legacy and online sources, have some merit in single case-studies, they are non-invariant and therefore non comparable. This means that any cross-population differences found employing them are likely a function of measurement idiosyncrasies or other unknown factors.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43545-022-00534-1.

摘要

未标注

对新闻媒体的信任在近一个世纪里受到了广泛的学术关注,由于媒体格局的最新发展以及新闻制作和消费方式的变化,这种关注得到了进一步提升。尽管如此,对新闻媒体信任的概念化仍存在争议,其测量的可比性尚未确立。在本文中,我在早期对新闻媒体信任的概念化基础上进行拓展,并测试三种理论推导的测量模型,以确定它们在28个欧盟国家的跨文化等效性。利用欧洲晴雨表数据,我采用多组验证性因素分析来测试这些测量的有效性和可比性。研究结果表明,信任是一个单维潜在结构,在不同背景下有相同的解释。人们对新闻媒体的信任程度反映了他们对所接触的所有媒体来源中的新闻报道和记者的总体态度。虽然对新闻媒体信任的双因素测量,区分传统媒体和在线媒体来源,在单一案例研究中有一定价值,但它们不具有不变性,因此不可比。这意味着使用它们发现的任何跨人群差异可能是测量特性或其他未知因素的作用。

补充信息

在线版本包含可在10.1007/s43545-022-00534-1获取的补充材料。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbfd/9540139/88911c0c1654/43545_2022_534_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbfd/9540139/316e5d0cf91e/43545_2022_534_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbfd/9540139/88911c0c1654/43545_2022_534_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbfd/9540139/316e5d0cf91e/43545_2022_534_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbfd/9540139/88911c0c1654/43545_2022_534_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Can we trust measures of trust? Measurement invariance in trust in EU news media.我们能信任信任度的衡量标准吗?对欧盟新闻媒体信任度的测量不变性。
SN Soc Sci. 2022;2(10):226. doi: 10.1007/s43545-022-00534-1. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
2
Vulnerability to the Effects of Conflicting Health Information: Testing the Moderating Roles of Trust in News Media and Research Literacy.易受冲突健康信息影响的程度:检验对新闻媒体信任和研究素养的调节作用。
Health Educ Behav. 2023 Apr;50(2):224-233. doi: 10.1177/10901981221110832. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
3
People's trust in health news disseminated by mass media in Tehran.德黑兰民众对大众媒体传播的健康新闻的信任度。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2014 Oct 18;28:114. eCollection 2014.
4
Why Do You Trust News? The Event-Related Potential Evidence of Media Channel and News Type.你为何信任新闻?媒体渠道与新闻类型的事件相关电位证据。
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 14;12:663485. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.663485. eCollection 2021.
5
Can We Trust Measures of Political Trust? Assessing Measurement Equivalence in Diverse Regime Types.我们能信任政治信任的衡量标准吗?评估不同政体类型中的测量等效性。
Soc Indic Res. 2017;133(3):963-984. doi: 10.1007/s11205-016-1400-8. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
6
Media literacy tips promoting reliable news improve discernment and enhance trust in traditional media.推广可靠新闻的媒体素养小贴士能提高辨别力并增强对传统媒体的信任。
Commun Psychol. 2024 Aug 14;2(1):74. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00121-5.
7
Sharing good NEWS across the world: developing comparable scores across 12 countries for the Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale (NEWS).在全球范围内分享好消息:为邻里环境步行性量表(NEWS)开发 12 个国家之间可比的分数。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Apr 8;13:309. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-309.
8
Mitigating infodemics: The relationship between news exposure and trust and belief in COVID-19 fake news and social media spreading.减轻信息疫情:新闻接触与对新冠疫情虚假新闻和社交媒体传播的信任和信念之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 4;16(6):e0252830. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252830. eCollection 2021.
9
Intention to consume news personal social media network and political trust among young people: The evidence from Hong Kong.年轻人对新闻的消费意愿、个人社交媒体网络与政治信任:来自香港的证据。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 12;13:1065059. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1065059. eCollection 2022.
10
Investigating intergroup attitudes in Europe: Cross-national data on news media, attitudes towards newcomers, and socio-psychological indicators.欧洲群体间态度调查:关于新闻媒体、对新移民的态度及社会心理指标的跨国数据
Data Brief. 2019 Sep 17;26:104535. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.104535. eCollection 2019 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
What to do when scalar invariance fails: The extended alignment method for multi-group factor analysis comparison of latent means across many groups.当标量不变性失效时该怎么办:用于多群组潜在均值跨群组比较的多群组因子分析的扩展对齐方法。
Psychol Methods. 2018 Sep;23(3):524-545. doi: 10.1037/met0000113. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
2
Identification of Confirmatory Factor Analysis Models of Different Levels of Invariance for Ordered Categorical Outcomes.有序分类结果不同水平不变性的验证性因素分析模型的识别
Psychometrika. 2016 Dec;81(4):1014-1045. doi: 10.1007/s11336-016-9506-0. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
3
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
结构模型中的比较拟合指数。
Psychol Bull. 1990 Mar;107(2):238-46. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238.