Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA.
Cartilage. 2022 Dec;13(4):119-132. doi: 10.1177/19476035221126349. Epub 2022 Oct 15.
The increasing prevalence of degenerative cartilage disorders in young patients is a growing public concern worldwide. Cartilage's poor innate regenerative capacity has inspired the exploration and development of cartilage replacement treatments such as tissue-engineered cartilages and osteochondral implants as potential solutions to cartilage loss. The clinical application of tissue-engineered implants is hindered by the lack of long-term follow-up demonstrating efficacy, biocompatibility, and bio-integration. The historically reported immunological privilege of cartilage tissue was based on histomorphological observations pointing out the lack of vascularity and the presence of a tight extracellular matrix. However, clinical studies in humans and animals do not unequivocally support the immune-privilege theory. More in-depth studies on cartilage immunology are needed to make clinical advances such as tissue engineering more applicable. This review analyzes the literature that supports and opposes the concept that cartilage is an immune-privileged tissue and provides insight into mechanisms conferring various degrees of immune privilege to other, more in-depth studied tissues such as testis, eyes, brain, and cancer.
年轻人中退行性软骨疾病的患病率不断上升,这是全球日益关注的公共问题。软骨先天再生能力差,这激发了人们对软骨替代治疗方法的探索和开发,如组织工程软骨和骨软骨移植物,以期解决软骨丢失的问题。然而,组织工程植入物的临床应用受到缺乏长期随访以证明其疗效、生物相容性和生物整合性的限制。历史上软骨组织的免疫特权是基于组织形态学观察得出的,这些观察指出软骨组织缺乏血管和存在紧密的细胞外基质。然而,人类和动物的临床研究并不能明确支持免疫特权理论。需要对软骨免疫学进行更深入的研究,以使组织工程等临床进展更具适用性。这篇综述分析了支持和反对软骨是免疫特权组织这一概念的文献,并深入探讨了赋予其他组织(如睾丸、眼睛、大脑和癌症)不同程度免疫特权的机制。