Support Center for Advanced Neuroimaging (SCAN), University Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University of Bern, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
Graduate School for Cellular and Biomedical Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2023 Feb 15;44(3):970-979. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26117. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
Brain morphometry is usually based on non-enhanced (pre-contrast) T1-weighted MRI. However, such dedicated protocols are sometimes missing in clinical examinations. Instead, an image with a contrast agent is often available. Existing tools such as FreeSurfer yield unreliable results when applied to contrast-enhanced (CE) images. Consequently, these acquisitions are excluded from retrospective morphometry studies, which reduces the sample size. We hypothesize that deep learning (DL)-based morphometry methods can extract morphometric measures also from contrast-enhanced MRI. We have extended DL+DiReCT to cope with contrast-enhanced MRI. Training data for our DL-based model were enriched with non-enhanced and CE image pairs from the same session. The segmentations were derived with FreeSurfer from the non-enhanced image and used as ground truth for the coregistered CE image. A longitudinal dataset of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), comprising relapsing remitting (RRMS) and primary progressive (PPMS) subgroups, was used for the evaluation. Global and regional cortical thickness derived from non-enhanced and CE images were contrasted to results from FreeSurfer. Correlation coefficients of global mean cortical thickness between non-enhanced and CE images were significantly larger with DL+DiReCT (r = 0.92) than with FreeSurfer (r = 0.75). When comparing the longitudinal atrophy rates between the two MS subgroups, the effect sizes between PPMS and RRMS were higher with DL+DiReCT both for non-enhanced (d = -0.304) and CE images (d = -0.169) than for FreeSurfer (non-enhanced d = -0.111, CE d = 0.085). In conclusion, brain morphometry can be derived reliably from contrast-enhanced MRI using DL-based morphometry tools, making additional cases available for analysis and potential future diagnostic morphometry tools.
脑形态计量学通常基于未增强(预对比)T1 加权 MRI。然而,在临床检查中,有时会缺少此类专用协议。相反,通常可以获得带有造影剂的图像。当应用于增强对比(CE)图像时,现有的工具(如 FreeSurfer)会产生不可靠的结果。因此,这些采集物会从回顾性形态计量研究中排除,从而减少样本量。我们假设基于深度学习(DL)的形态计量方法也可以从增强对比的 MRI 中提取形态计量测量值。我们已经扩展了 DL+DiReCT 以适应增强对比的 MRI。我们基于 DL 的模型的训练数据是通过从同一会话中的未增强和 CE 图像对进行丰富而获得的。使用 FreeSurfer 从未增强的图像中得出分割,并将其用作核心注册的 CE 图像的真实值。我们使用多发性硬化症(MS)患者的纵向数据集进行评估,该数据集包括复发缓解型(RRMS)和原发性进展型(PPMS)亚组。从未增强和 CE 图像得出的全局和区域皮质厚度与 FreeSurfer 的结果进行对比。未增强和 CE 图像之间的全局平均皮质厚度的相关系数使用 DL+DiReCT 明显更大(r=0.92),而使用 FreeSurfer 则更小(r=0.75)。在比较两个 MS 亚组之间的纵向萎缩率时,使用 DL+DiReCT 的 PPMS 和 RRMS 之间的效应大小均高于 FreeSurfer(未增强的 d=-0.304,CE 的 d=-0.169,而 FreeSurfer 为未增强的 d=-0.111,CE 的 d=0.085)。总之,使用基于 DL 的形态计量工具可以从增强对比的 MRI 中可靠地得出脑形态计量学,为分析提供更多的病例,并为潜在的未来诊断形态计量工具提供更多的病例。