Crosignani Andrea, Spina Stefano, Marrazzo Francesco, Cimbanassi Stefania, Malbrain Manu L N G, Van Regenmortel Niels, Fumagalli Roberto, Langer Thomas
School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Ann Intensive Care. 2022 Oct 17;12(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s13613-022-01072-y.
Patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) often require ICU admission, especially when signs of multiorgan failure are present, a condition that defines AP as severe. This disease is characterized by a massive pancreatic release of pro-inflammatory cytokines that causes a systemic inflammatory response syndrome and a profound intravascular fluid loss. This leads to a mixed hypovolemic and distributive shock and ultimately to multiorgan failure. Aggressive fluid resuscitation is traditionally considered the mainstay treatment of AP. In fact, all available guidelines underline the importance of fluid therapy, particularly in the first 24-48 h after disease onset. However, there is currently no consensus neither about the type, nor about the optimal fluid rate, total volume, or goal of fluid administration. In general, a starting fluid rate of 5-10 ml/kg/h of Ringer's lactate solution for the first 24 h has been recommended. Fluid administration should be aggressive in the first hours, and continued only for the appropriate time frame, being usually discontinued, or significantly reduced after the first 24-48 h after admission. Close clinical and hemodynamic monitoring along with the definition of clear resuscitation goals are fundamental. Generally accepted targets are urinary output, reversal of tachycardia and hypotension, and improvement of laboratory markers. However, the usefulness of different endpoints to guide fluid therapy is highly debated. The importance of close monitoring of fluid infusion and balance is acknowledged by most available guidelines to avoid the deleterious effect of fluid overload. Fluid therapy should be carefully tailored in patients with severe AP, as for other conditions frequently managed in the ICU requiring large fluid amounts, such as septic shock and burn injury. A combination of both noninvasive clinical and invasive hemodynamic parameters, and laboratory markers should guide clinicians in the early phase of severe AP to meet organ perfusion requirements with the proper administration of fluids while avoiding fluid overload. In this narrative review the most recent evidence about fluid therapy in severe AP is discussed and an operative algorithm for fluid administration based on an individualized approach is proposed.
急性胰腺炎(AP)患者常需入住重症监护病房(ICU),尤其是出现多器官功能衰竭迹象时,这种情况将AP定义为重症。该病的特征是胰腺大量释放促炎细胞因子,引发全身炎症反应综合征和严重的血管内液体丢失。这会导致混合性低血容量性和分布性休克,最终导致多器官功能衰竭。传统上,积极的液体复苏被认为是AP的主要治疗方法。事实上,所有现有指南都强调了液体治疗的重要性,尤其是在疾病发作后的最初24 - 48小时内。然而,目前对于液体的类型、最佳输液速度、总量或输液目标尚无共识。一般来说,建议在最初24小时内以5 - 10毫升/千克/小时的速度输注乳酸林格氏液。在最初几个小时内液体输注应积极进行,且仅在适当的时间段内持续,通常在入院后的最初24 - 48小时后停止或显著减少。密切的临床和血流动力学监测以及明确的复苏目标定义至关重要。普遍接受的目标是尿量、心动过速和低血压的逆转以及实验室指标的改善。然而,不同终点指标指导液体治疗的有效性存在高度争议。大多数现有指南都承认密切监测液体输注和平衡的重要性,以避免液体过载的有害影响。对于重症AP患者,应像ICU中其他经常需要大量液体的情况(如感染性休克和烧伤)一样,仔细调整液体治疗方案。在重症AP的早期阶段,应结合无创临床和有创血流动力学参数以及实验室指标,指导临床医生以适当的液体输注满足器官灌注需求,同时避免液体过载。在本叙述性综述中,讨论了关于重症AP液体治疗的最新证据,并提出了基于个体化方法的液体输注操作算法。