Costea Cristian-Nicolae, Pojoga Cristina, Seicean Andrada
Departament of Gastroneterology, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Croitorilor Str., no 19-21, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Croitorilor Str., no 19-21, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Mar 22;15(7):810. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15070810.
Acute pancreatitis (AP) is an inflammatory condition with diverse origins, often resulting in significant morbidity and mortality due to systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and multiorgan failure. Fluid resuscitation is pivotal in early management, and it is aimed at preventing hypovolemia-induced ischemia and necrosis. This review evaluates fluid therapy strategies in AP, including fluid types, resuscitation rates, and clinical outcomes. This systematic review was conducted in January 2025 using databases such as PubMed, Medline, and Google Scholar, focusing on studies published between 2010 and 2024. Search terms included "acute pancreatitis", "fluid resuscitation", and related keywords. Studies involving adults with AP were analyzed to compare the outcomes of crystalloid and colloid use, aggressive vs. moderate fluid resuscitation, and administration timings. The primary outcomes were mortality and severe complications, while secondary outcomes included organ failure, SIRS, and length of hospital stay. Crystalloids, particularly Ringer's lactate (RL), are superior to normal saline in reducing SIRS, organ failure, and intensive care unit stays without significantly affecting mortality rates. Colloids were associated with adverse events such as renal impairment and coagulopathy, limiting their use. Aggressive fluid resuscitation increased the risk of fluid overload, respiratory failure, and acute kidney injury, particularly in severe AP, while moderate hydration protocols achieved comparable clinical outcomes with fewer complications. Moderate fluid resuscitation using RL is recommended for managing AP, balancing efficacy with safety. Further research is needed to establish optimal endpoints and protocols for fluid therapy, ensuring improved patient outcomes while minimizing complications.
急性胰腺炎(AP)是一种病因多样的炎症性疾病,常因全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)和多器官功能衰竭导致显著的发病率和死亡率。液体复苏在早期管理中至关重要,其目的是预防低血容量性缺血和坏死。本综述评估了急性胰腺炎中的液体治疗策略,包括液体类型、复苏率和临床结局。本系统综述于2025年1月进行,使用了PubMed、Medline和谷歌学术等数据库,重点关注2010年至2024年发表的研究。检索词包括“急性胰腺炎”“液体复苏”及相关关键词。对涉及成年急性胰腺炎患者的研究进行分析,以比较晶体液和胶体液的使用效果、积极液体复苏与适度液体复苏以及给药时机的差异。主要结局为死亡率和严重并发症,次要结局包括器官功能衰竭、SIRS和住院时间。晶体液,尤其是乳酸林格液(RL),在降低SIRS、器官功能衰竭和重症监护病房住院时间方面优于生理盐水,且对死亡率无显著影响。胶体液与肾功能损害和凝血病等不良事件相关,限制了其使用。积极液体复苏增加了液体超负荷、呼吸衰竭和急性肾损伤的风险,尤其是在重症急性胰腺炎中,而适度补液方案可实现相当的临床结局且并发症更少。推荐使用RL进行适度液体复苏来管理急性胰腺炎,在疗效和安全性之间取得平衡。需要进一步研究以确定液体治疗的最佳终点和方案,确保改善患者结局的同时将并发症降至最低。