• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会决定因素与美国老年医疗保险受益人群 2 型糖尿病患者中新的降糖药物的采用。

Social determinants of health and newer glucose-lowering drugs adoption among US Medicare beneficiaries with type 2 diabetes.

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville.

Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Nov;30(11):1298-1307. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.11.1298.

DOI:10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.11.1298
PMID:39471265
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11522454/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Two classes of newer glucose-lowering drugs (GLDs), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, improve cardiovascular and renal outcomes among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, racial and ethnic minority groups carry higher cardiovascular risks but have lower access to newer GLDs. Contextual-level social determinants of health (SDOH) may be the underlying factor associated with newer GLD adoption.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the association between contextual-level SDOH and real-world adoption of newer GLDs among Medicare beneficiaries and to examine the nonstationarity in the associations.

METHODS

Data were from 15% random samples of January 2017 to December 2018 nationwide Medicare beneficiaries. We identified patients with T2D who did not use newer GLDs in the year before the index date-January 1, 2018-and followed the cohort for 1 year to record their status of initiating a newer GLD. We used a geographically weighted multivariable Poisson regression model to determine to what extent the SDOH-newer GLD initiation association (β coefficient) varied geographically.

RESULTS

We identified 795,469 eligible Medicare beneficiaries with T2D during the study period from our dataset. Of the study cohort, mean age was 73.1 (SD = 10.5) years, 424,312 (53.3%) were female, 562,994 (70.8%) were non-Hispanic White, 96,891 (12.2%) were non-Hispanic Black, 84,744 (10.6%) were Hispanic, and 29,645 (3.7%) were Asian/Pacific Islander. Newer GLD initiation was negatively associated with the percentage of the population reporting non-Hispanic Black race, Hispanic ethnicity, and unemployment, as revealed by nonspatial regression analyses. The county-level median household income was also associated with higher newer GLD initiation. The spatial analysis presented distinct distributions of local parameter estimates for each contextual-level SDOH.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified key contextual-level SDOH associated with real-world adoption of newer GLDs and explored their geographic variation through spatially explicit, data-driven analytical approaches. Identifying areas of strong association between SDOH and newer GLD initiation is crucial for policymakers to allocate resources and develop interventions that address structural inequities.

摘要

背景

两类新型降糖药物(GLD),钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂,改善了 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者的心血管和肾脏结局。然而,少数族裔群体的心血管风险更高,但获得新型 GLD 的机会却更少。健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)可能是与新型 GLD 采用相关的潜在因素。

目的

确定医疗保险受益人群中社会决定因素与新型 GLD 实际采用之间的关系,并检验关联的非平稳性。

方法

数据来自全国医疗保险 2017 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月的 15%随机样本。我们确定了索引日期(2018 年 1 月 1 日)前一年未使用新型 GLD 的 T2D 患者,并对该队列进行了为期 1 年的随访,以记录他们开始使用新型 GLD 的情况。我们使用地理加权多变量泊松回归模型来确定社会决定因素-新型 GLD 起始关联(β系数)在多大程度上存在地域差异。

结果

从我们的数据库中,我们确定了研究期间符合条件的 795469 名有 T2D 的医疗保险受益患者。在研究队列中,平均年龄为 73.1(SD=10.5)岁,424312(53.3%)为女性,562994(70.8%)为非西班牙裔白人,96891(12.2%)为非西班牙裔黑人,84744(10.6%)为西班牙裔,29645(3.7%)为亚洲/太平洋岛民。非空间回归分析显示,新型 GLD 起始与报告非西班牙裔黑人比例、西班牙裔比例和失业率的人群百分比呈负相关。县一级的家庭收入中位数也与更高的新型 GLD 起始相关。空间分析呈现了每个社会决定因素的局部参数估计的独特分布。

结论

我们确定了与新型 GLD 实际采用相关的关键社会决定因素,并通过空间明确、数据驱动的分析方法探索了它们的地理差异。确定社会决定因素与新型 GLD 起始之间的强关联区域对于政策制定者分配资源和制定解决结构性不平等问题的干预措施至关重要。

相似文献

1
Social determinants of health and newer glucose-lowering drugs adoption among US Medicare beneficiaries with type 2 diabetes.社会决定因素与美国老年医疗保险受益人群 2 型糖尿病患者中新的降糖药物的采用。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Nov;30(11):1298-1307. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.11.1298.
2
Geographic variation and racial disparities in adoption of newer glucose-lowering drugs with cardiovascular benefits among US Medicare beneficiaries with type 2 diabetes.美国 Medicare 计划 2 型糖尿病受益人群中新型降糖药物(具有心血管获益)的采用存在地域差异和种族差异。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 29;19(1):e0297208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297208. eCollection 2024.
3
Impact of Contextual-Level Social Determinants of Health on Newer Antidiabetic Drug Adoption in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.语境健康决定因素对 2 型糖尿病患者采用新型抗糖尿病药物的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 24;20(5):4036. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054036.
4
Trends in utilization patterns of newer glucose-lowering drugs in US adults with type 2 diabetes and a history of coronary heart disease or heart failure: 2005-2019.2005-2019 年美国有冠心病或心力衰竭史的 2 型糖尿病成人中新的降糖药物利用模式趋势。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2024 Oct;18(5):561-563. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2024.07.003. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
5
Newer second-line glucose-lowering drugs versus thiazolidinediones on cirrhosis risk among older US adult patients with type 2 diabetes.新型二线降糖药物与噻唑烷二酮类药物在老年 2 型糖尿病美国成年患者中的肝硬化风险比较。
J Diabetes Complications. 2020 Nov;34(11):107706. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2020.107706. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
6
Comparison of Diabetes Medications Used by Adults With Commercial Insurance vs Medicare Advantage, 2016 to 2019.2016 年至 2019 年商业保险与医疗保险优势计划中成年人使用的糖尿病药物比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2035792. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.35792.
7
Association of Race and Ethnicity With Prescription of SGLT2 Inhibitors and GLP1 Receptor Agonists Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in the Veterans Health Administration System.在美国退伍军人事务部医疗体系中,2 型糖尿病患者种族和民族与 SGLT2 抑制剂和 GLP1 受体激动剂处方的相关性。
JAMA. 2022 Sep 6;328(9):861-871. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.13885.
8
Association of formulary restrictions and initiation of an SGLT2i or GLP1-RA among Medicare beneficiaries with type 2 diabetes.医保受益人群中 2 型糖尿病患者的 SGLT2i 或 GLP1-RA 起始用药与目录限制的关联。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2022 May;187:109855. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2022.109855. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
9
Comparative Effectiveness of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists, Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors, Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors, and Sulfonylureas for Sight-Threatening Diabetic Retinopathy.胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂、钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白 2 抑制剂、二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂和磺脲类药物治疗威胁视力的糖尿病视网膜病变的疗效比较。
Ophthalmol Retina. 2024 Oct;8(10):943-952. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2024.05.003. Epub 2024 May 11.
10
Adoption of New Glucose-Lowering Medications in the U.S.-The Case of SGLT2 Inhibitors: Nationwide Cohort Study.美国新型降血糖药物的采用情况——以 SGLT2 抑制剂为例:全国队列研究。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019 Dec;21(12):702-712. doi: 10.1089/dia.2019.0213. Epub 2019 Oct 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Race and ethnicity and pharmacy dispensing of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病患者中SGLT2抑制剂和GLP-1受体激动剂的种族、民族与药房配药情况
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 May 7;34:100759. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100759. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Impact of Contextual-Level Social Determinants of Health on Newer Antidiabetic Drug Adoption in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.语境健康决定因素对 2 型糖尿病患者采用新型抗糖尿病药物的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 24;20(5):4036. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054036.
3
9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023.9. 血糖治疗的药物学方法:2023 年糖尿病的护理标准。
Diabetes Care. 2023 Jan 1;46(Suppl 1):S140-S157. doi: 10.2337/dc23-S009.
4
Changes in racial and ethnic disparities in glucose-lowering drug utilization and glycated haemoglobin A1c in US adults with diabetes: 2005-2018.美国糖尿病患者中降血糖药物利用和糖化血红蛋白 A1c 的种族和民族差异的变化:2005-2018 年。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023 Feb;25(2):516-525. doi: 10.1111/dom.14894. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
5
Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Inequities in Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Use Among Patients With Diabetes in the US.在美国糖尿病患者中,胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂使用的种族、民族和社会经济不平等现象。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Dec 17;2(12):e214182. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.4182. eCollection 2021 Dec.
6
County-level variation in cardioprotective antihyperglycemic prescribing among medicare beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人心血管保护类降糖药物处方的县级差异。
Am J Prev Cardiol. 2022 Aug 2;11:100370. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2022.100370. eCollection 2022 Sep.
7
Socioeconomic Factors Associated With Glycemic Measurement and Poor HbA1c Control in People With Type 2 Diabetes: The Global DISCOVER Study.与 2 型糖尿病患者血糖测量和 HbA1c 控制不佳相关的社会经济因素:全球 DISCOVER 研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Apr 22;13:831676. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.831676. eCollection 2022.
8
The association between neighborhood social and economic environment and prevalent diabetes in urban and rural communities: The Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study.城乡社区邻里社会经济环境与糖尿病患病率之间的关联:中风地理和种族差异原因(REGARDS)研究。
SSM Popul Health. 2022 Mar 8;17:101050. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101050. eCollection 2022 Mar.
9
Social Determinants of Health, Race, and Diabetes Population Health Improvement: Black/African Americans as a Population Exemplar.社会决定因素与健康、种族和糖尿病人群健康改善:以非裔美国人作为一个人群范例。
Curr Diab Rep. 2022 Mar;22(3):117-128. doi: 10.1007/s11892-022-01454-3. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
10
Time-series analysis of recent antihyperglycemic medication prescribing trends for a diverse sample of Medicare enrollees with type 2 diabetes mellitus in an integrated health system.在一个综合医疗体系中,对 2 型糖尿病的多样化医疗保险参保者的近期抗高血糖药物处方趋势进行时间序列分析。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2022 Jun 7;79(12):950-959. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/zxac056.