Schwan A, Rydén A C
Scand J Infect Dis. 1978;10(3):213-8. doi: 10.3109/inf.1978.10.issue-3.10.
13 patients with Bacteroides fragilis infections were studied for antibody response against the infecting strain using indirect immunofluorescence (IFL), passive hemagglutination (HA) and tube agglutination (TA). With indirect IFL significant titre changes in IgG were found in 12/13 cases, in IgA in 8/13 and in IgM in 4/13 cases. With passive HA significant titre changes were found in 11/13 cases and with TA in 6/11 cases. The rise in antibody titre was fast and persisted for a long time in most cases. Of the methods used the indirect IFL was the most convenient for clinical use.
对13例脆弱拟杆菌感染患者进行了研究,采用间接免疫荧光法(IFL)、被动血凝法(HA)和试管凝集法(TA)检测其针对感染菌株的抗体反应。采用间接免疫荧光法时,13例中有12例IgG出现显著滴度变化,13例中有8例IgA出现变化,13例中有4例IgM出现变化。采用被动血凝法时,13例中有11例出现显著滴度变化,采用试管凝集法时,11例中有6例出现变化。抗体滴度上升迅速,多数情况下持续较长时间。在所使用的方法中,间接免疫荧光法最便于临床应用。