Suppr超能文献

通过免疫荧光法检测脆弱拟杆菌群

Detection of Bacteroides fragilis group by immunofluorescence.

作者信息

Radu I, Bittner J, Macovei A, Costache L, Mihalache D, Munteanu V

机构信息

Cantacuzino Institute; Bucharest, Romania.

出版信息

Roum Arch Microbiol Immunol. 1991 Apr-Jun;50(2):95-108.

PMID:1820192
Abstract

The following strains: B. fragilis subspecies thetaiotaomicron (A); B. fragilis subspecies fragilis strain E-1, E-2, M, St., Se., Ni., 8, 16; B. fragilis subspecies distasonis 145 (D) were serologically studied by immunofluorescence as compared to agglutination. Anti-B. fragilis sera titration by immunofluorescence (IF) reaction, as compared to agglutination reaction in tube, was more sensitive (2-16 times higher titers), specific and reproducible. Among the organisms from B. fragilis group, species, subspecies and even train specificity was noticed. Also, the possibility for rapid identification of anaerobic organisms, belonging to B. fragilis group, in pathologic products obtained from experimentally infected animals (mice and rats), by IF reaction, in comparison with classic methods (anaerobic cultures and biochemical determinations) was studied. Of 87 studied animals, 61 proved positive by cultures and 59 by IF; 56 animals were shown positive and 23 animals proved negative by both methods (intermethods concordance in 79 cases). Statistical analysis of IF results provided the following: method sensitivity (detection capacity of real-positive cases)-91.80%; method specificity (detection capacity of real-negative cases)-88.46%; false-positive cases-11.53%; false-negative cases-8.19%. Immunofluorescence proved specific, sensitive, practical and rapid method detection of non-sporulated anaerobic organisms species and subspecies belonging to Bacteroides fragilis group.

摘要

对以下菌株进行了血清学研究

脆弱拟杆菌亚种多形拟杆菌(A);脆弱拟杆菌亚种脆弱拟杆菌菌株E-1、E-2、M、St.、Se.、Ni.、8、16;脆弱拟杆菌亚种狄氏拟杆菌145(D),采用免疫荧光法与凝集试验进行比较。与试管凝集反应相比,通过免疫荧光(IF)反应进行抗脆弱拟杆菌血清滴定更为灵敏(效价高2至16倍)、特异且可重复。在脆弱拟杆菌属的微生物中,发现了种、亚种甚至菌株特异性。此外,还研究了通过IF反应与经典方法(厌氧培养和生化测定)相比,在实验感染动物(小鼠和大鼠)的病理产物中快速鉴定属于脆弱拟杆菌属的厌氧微生物的可能性。在87只研究动物中,61只通过培养证明为阳性,59只通过IF证明为阳性;56只动物两种方法均显示为阳性,23只动物两种方法均证明为阴性(两种方法一致性为79例)。对IF结果的统计分析如下:方法敏感性(实际阳性病例的检测能力)-91.80%;方法特异性(实际阴性病例的检测能力)-88.46%;假阳性病例-11.53%;假阴性病例-8.19%。免疫荧光证明是检测属于脆弱拟杆菌属的无芽孢厌氧微生物种和亚种的特异、灵敏、实用且快速的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验