Restorative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Ahram Canadian University (ACU), Industrial Zone, 6th of October City, Giza, Egypt.
Division of Biomaterials, Prosthetic Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, King Salman International University, El Tur, South Sinai, Egypt.
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Oct 17;22(1):446. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02495-6.
Proper isolation and restoration of class V subgingival cavities are technique sensitive, thus the resin composite restoration is liable to contamination. This in vitro study was conducted to evaluate the surface microhardness and compressive strength of bulk-fill flowable resin composite after being contaminated during its packing.
Resin composite discs were prepared using split mold. The contaminated specimens were allocated into four groups (n = 20) according to the contaminant used: hemostatic agent (Group 1), alcohol (Group 2), artificial saliva (Group 3) and powdered gloves (Group 4). The non-contaminated specimens (n = 20) were used as control group. The surface microhardness and compressive strength of each group were tested 1-day post-photocuring (n = 5) and 1 month post-photocuring (n = 5). Values were presented as mean, standard deviation values and confidence intervals.
The surface microhardness of all groups didn't show a significant difference for different tested groups except for alcohol which showed a significant reduction on surface microhardness compared to control at 1 day post-photocuring (p = 0.001). The highest compressive strength mean values at 1 day and 1 month post-photocuring were recorded in control groups (110.42 MPa and 172.87 MPa respectively), followed by alcohol groups, then hemostatic agent groups, followed by artificial saliva with the least value recorded in powdered gloves groups (56.71 MPa and 49.5 MPa respectively).
Contamination of bulk-fill flowable resin composite with hemostatic agent, alcohol, artificial saliva, or powdered gloves during its packing decreased its compressive strength after 1 month post-photocuring rather than affecting its surface microhardness.
适当的隔离和修复龈下 V 类窝洞是一项技术敏感性操作,因此树脂复合材料修复体容易受到污染。本体外研究旨在评估在包装过程中受到污染后块状流树脂复合材料的表面显微硬度和抗压强度。
使用分体模具制备树脂复合材料圆盘。根据使用的污染物将污染的标本分为四组(n=20):止血剂(第 1 组)、酒精(第 2 组)、人工唾液(第 3 组)和粉末手套(第 4 组)。未污染的标本(n=20)作为对照组。在光固化后 1 天(n=5)和 1 个月(n=5)分别测试每组的表面显微硬度和抗压强度。结果以均值、标准差值和置信区间表示。
各组的表面显微硬度在不同测试组之间没有显著差异,除了酒精组在光固化后 1 天的表面显微硬度与对照组相比有显著降低(p=0.001)。光固化后 1 天和 1 个月的抗压强度最高平均值记录在对照组(分别为 110.42 MPa 和 172.87 MPa),其次是酒精组,然后是止血剂组,最后是人工唾液组,粉末手套组记录的最低值(分别为 56.71 MPa 和 49.5 MPa)。
在包装过程中,块状流树脂复合材料被止血剂、酒精、人工唾液或粉末手套污染,会降低其在光固化后 1 个月后的抗压强度,而不会影响其表面显微硬度。