Kaurov Alexander A, Cologna Viktoria, Tyson Charlie, Oreskes Naomi
Department of the History of Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA USA.
Program in Interdisciplinary Studies, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ USA.
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2022;9(1):368. doi: 10.1057/s41599-022-01382-3. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
Scientists in the United States are more politically liberal than the general population. This fact has fed charges of political bias. To learn more about scientists' political behavior, we analyze publicly available Federal Election Commission data. We find that scientists who donate to federal candidates and parties are far more likely to support Democrats than Republicans, with less than 10 percent of donations going to Republicans in recent years. The same pattern holds true for employees of the academic sector generally, and for scientists employed in the energy sector. This was not always the case: Before 2000, political contributions were more evenly divided between Democrats and Republicans. We argue that these observed changes are more readily explained by changes in Republican Party attitudes toward science than by changes in American scientists. We reason that greater public involvement by centrist and conservative scientists could help increase trust in science among Republicans.
美国的科学家在政治上比普通民众更加倾向于自由主义。这一事实引发了关于政治偏见的指责。为了更多地了解科学家的政治行为,我们分析了联邦选举委员会公开的数据。我们发现,向联邦候选人及政党捐款的科学家远比支持民主党人更支持共和党人,近年来向共和党人的捐款不到10%。学术领域的员工总体上以及能源领域的科学家也是如此。情况并非一直如此:2000年之前,政治捐款在民主党人和共和党人之间的分配更为平均。我们认为,观察到的这些变化更容易用共和党对科学态度的变化来解释,而不是美国科学家的变化。我们推断,中间派和保守派科学家更多地参与公众事务有助于增强共和党人对科学的信任。