Druckman James N, Ellenbogen Kirsten M, Scheufele Dietram A, Yanovitzky Itzhak
Department of Political Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627.
Great Lakes Science Center, Cleveland, OH 44114.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jul 8;122(27):e2400932122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2400932122. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
Science should not unilaterally dictate individuals' decisions or public policies. Yet, it provides a vital source of information for societies and individuals that can often improve outcomes and well-being. This requires, however, the effective communication of scientific information. We identify two paradigms for science communication. One focuses on dissemination, often seeking to inform, reframe, or correct beliefs. Another emphasizes participation and engagement with the goal of improving public understanding of science and scientists' understanding of the public's concerns, needs, and values. We argue that participatory approaches better address contemporary challenges concerning scientific uncertainty, politicized science, artificial value neutrality, and a reactive science communication infrastructure. These approaches though need to move away from transactional partnerships toward more cocreation and coproduction of knowledge. They also need to focus more on less motivated and/or engaged populations. Investment in a participatory infrastructure is crucial given that even the most path-breaking science only matters if it can be adequately communicated to relevant stakeholders.
科学不应单方面决定个人决策或公共政策。然而,它为社会和个人提供了至关重要的信息来源,这些信息常常能改善结果、增进福祉。不过,这需要科学信息的有效传播。我们确定了科学传播的两种范式。一种侧重于传播,通常旨在告知、重新构建或纠正观念。另一种强调参与和互动,目标是增进公众对科学的理解以及科学家对公众关切、需求和价值观的理解。我们认为,参与式方法能更好地应对有关科学不确定性、政治化科学、人为价值中立以及被动反应式科学传播基础设施等当代挑战。然而,这些方法需要从交易性伙伴关系转向更多的知识共同创造和共同生产。它们还需要更多地关注积极性不高和/或参与度较低的人群。鉴于即使是最具开创性的科学,只有在能够充分传达给相关利益攸关方时才重要,因此对参与式基础设施的投资至关重要。