Suppr超能文献

Casirivimab 和 Imdevimab 治疗可降低病毒载量并改善具有非中和或边缘中和抗体的血清阳性住院 COVID-19 患者的临床结局。

Casirivimab and Imdevimab Treatment Reduces Viral Load and Improves Clinical Outcomes in Seropositive Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients with Nonneutralizing or Borderline Neutralizing Antibodies.

机构信息

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, New York, USA.

Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.

出版信息

mBio. 2022 Dec 20;13(6):e0169922. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01699-22. Epub 2022 Oct 18.

Abstract

We conducted a analysis in seropositive patients who were negative or borderline for functional neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) at baseline from a phase 1, 2, and 3 trial of casirivimab and imdevimab (CAS+IMD) treatment in hospitalized coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients on low-flow or no supplemental oxygen prior to the emergence of Omicron-lineage variants. Patients were randomized to a single dose of 2.4 g CAS+IMD, 8.0 g CAS+IMD, or placebo. Patients seropositive for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies at baseline were analyzed by their baseline neutralizing antibody status. At baseline, 20.6% (178/864) of seropositive patients were negative or borderline for neutralizing antibodies, indicating negative or very low functionally neutralizing anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. CAS+IMD reduced viral load in patients who were negative or borderline for neutralizing antibodies versus placebo, but not in patients who were positive for neutralizing antibodies. In patients who were negative or borderline for neutralizing antibodies, we observed a trend in reduction of the proportion of patients who died or required mechanical ventilation, as well as in all-cause mortality, by day 29 with CAS+IMD versus placebo. The proportions of patients who died or required mechanical ventilation from days 1 to 29 were 19.1% in the placebo group and 10.9% in the CAS+IMD combined-dose group, and the proportions of patients who died (all-cause mortality) from days 1 to 29 were 16.2% in the placebo group and 9.1% in the CAS+IMD combined-dose group. In patients who were positive for neutralizing antibodies, no measurable harm or benefit was observed in either the proportion of patients who died or required mechanical ventilation or the proportion of patients who died (all-cause mortality). In hospitalized COVID-19 patients on low-flow or no supplemental oxygen, CAS+IMD reduced viral load, the risk of death or mechanical ventilation, and all-cause mortality in seropositive patients who were negative or borderline for neutralizing antibodies. The clinical benefit of CAS+IMD in hospitalized seronegative patients with COVID-19 has previously been demonstrated, although these studies observed no clinical benefit in seropositive patients. As the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2-seropositive individuals rises due to both vaccination and previous infection, it is important to understand whether there is a subset of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 with antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 who could benefit from anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody treatment. This analysis demonstrates that there is a subset of hospitalized seropositive patients with inadequate SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing antibodies (i.e., those who were negative or borderline for neutralizing antibodies) who may still benefit from CAS+IMD treatment if infected with a susceptible SARS-CoV-2 variant. Therefore, utilizing serostatus alone to guide treatment decisions for patients with COVID-19 may fail to identify those seropositive patients who could benefit from anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibody therapies known to be effective against circulating strains, dependent upon how effectively their endogenous antibodies neutralize SARS-CoV-2.

摘要

我们对一项 1 期、2 期和 3 期 casirivimab 和 imdevimab(CAS+IMD)治疗住院的 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者的研究进行了分析,这些患者在奥密克戎谱系变异出现之前,接受的低流量或无补充氧气治疗,基线时针对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)的功能性中和抗体(NAbs)呈阴性或边界阳性。患者被随机分配接受单次 2.4 g CAS+IMD、8.0 g CAS+IMD 或安慰剂治疗。基线时抗 SARS-CoV-2 抗体呈阳性的患者根据基线中和抗体状态进行分析。基线时,20.6%(178/864)的血清阳性患者对中和抗体呈阴性或边界阳性,表明对 SARS-CoV-2 的中和抗体呈阴性或极低功能。与安慰剂相比,CAS+IMD 降低了中和抗体阴性或边界阳性患者的病毒载量,但对中和抗体阳性患者没有影响。在中和抗体阴性或边界阳性的患者中,我们观察到,与安慰剂相比,第 29 天使用 CAS+IMD 治疗可降低死亡或需要机械通气的患者比例以及全因死亡率,呈下降趋势。安慰剂组第 1 至 29 天死亡或需要机械通气的患者比例为 19.1%,CAS+IMD 联合剂量组为 10.9%,第 1 至 29 天死亡(全因死亡率)的患者比例安慰剂组为 16.2%,CAS+IMD 联合剂量组为 9.1%。在中和抗体阳性的患者中,无论死亡或需要机械通气的患者比例,还是死亡(全因死亡率)的患者比例,都没有观察到可衡量的危害或获益。在接受低流量或无补充氧气的住院 COVID-19 患者中,CAS+IMD 降低了病毒载量,降低了中和抗体阴性或边界阳性患者死亡或机械通气以及全因死亡率的风险。此前已经证明,在住院 COVID-19 血清阴性患者中,CAS+IMD 具有临床获益,尽管这些研究在血清阳性患者中没有观察到临床获益。由于接种疫苗和先前感染,SARS-CoV-2 血清阳性个体的比例增加,因此了解是否存在一组 COVID-19 住院患者对 SARS-CoV-2 具有中和抗体,可能受益于抗 SARS-CoV-2 单克隆抗体治疗非常重要。这项分析表明,存在一组中和抗体不足(即对中和抗体呈阴性或边界阳性)的住院血清阳性患者,如果感染了易感 SARS-CoV-2 变异株,可能仍受益于 CAS+IMD 治疗。因此,仅利用血清状态来指导 COVID-19 患者的治疗决策可能无法识别那些可能受益于针对循环株有效的抗 SARS-CoV-2 单克隆抗体治疗的血清阳性患者,这取决于其内源性抗体对 SARS-CoV-2 的中和能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81e0/9765482/3fe79cdc72a5/mbio.01699-22-f001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验