Held Matthias, Weiner Simon, Walthelm Johanna, Joa Franziska, Hoffmann Jörg, Güder Gülmisal, Pfeuffer-Jovic Elena
Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Pneumologie und Beatmungsmedizin, Standort Missioklinik, Klinikum Würzburg Mitte gGmbH.
Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Neuroradiologie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg.
Pneumologie. 2022 Oct;76(10):689-696. doi: 10.1055/a-1916-1431. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
The World Conference on PH recommended differentiation of isolated postcapillary (Ipc) and combined post- and precapillary (Cpc) PH according to pulmonary vascular resistance alone. The aim of this study was the haemodynamic and functional characterization of patients diagnosed IpcPH and CpcPH according to the current recommendation of the latest World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) with an exploratory data analysis.
We evaluated all consecutive patients presenting at the PH outpatient clinic of Mission Medical Hospital from 2008-2015. All received a complete diagnostic work-up according to the guidelines. We analyzed data of patients with mPAP ≥ 25 mmHg and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP > 15 mmHg. We compared anthropometric, hemodynamic and functional data of six-minute walking test (6 MWT), cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and echocardiography of patients with IpcPH and CpcPH.
Out of 726 patients 58 showed a postcapillary PH: IpcPH: n = 20; CpcPH: n = 38. Patients with IpcPH had a significantly lower mPAP and PVR than patients with CpcPH. Cardiac index was lower in the Cpc-PH group compared to the IpcPH group. Functional capacity did not differ. CpcPH patients showed a higher right/left atrial area (RA/LA)-ratio.
Although CpcPH patients showed higher values of mPAP and PVR functional capacity was not worse than in patients with IpcPH. In patients with PH due to left heart disease an elevated RA/LA ratio may indicate CpcPH and invasive diagnostic work-up should be considered.
世界肺动脉高压大会建议仅根据肺血管阻力来区分孤立性毛细血管后(Ipc)和毛细血管前与后合并性(Cpc)肺动脉高压。本研究的目的是根据最新世界肺动脉高压研讨会的当前建议,对诊断为IpcPH和CpcPH的患者进行血流动力学和功能特征分析,并进行探索性数据分析。
我们评估了2008年至2015年在使命医疗医院肺动脉高压门诊就诊的所有连续患者。所有患者均根据指南接受了完整的诊断检查。我们分析了平均肺动脉压(mPAP)≥25 mmHg且肺毛细血管楔压(PCWP)>15 mmHg的患者数据。我们比较了IpcPH和CpcPH患者的人体测量学、血流动力学和功能数据,包括六分钟步行试验(6 MWT)、心肺运动试验(CPET)和超声心动图检查结果。
在726例患者中,58例表现为毛细血管后肺动脉高压:IpcPH:n = 20;CpcPH:n = 38。IpcPH患者的mPAP和肺血管阻力(PVR)显著低于CpcPH患者。Cpc-PH组的心脏指数低于IpcPH组。功能能力无差异。CpcPH患者的右/左心房面积(RA/LA)比值较高。
尽管CpcPH患者的mPAP和PVR值较高,但其功能能力并不比IpcPH患者差。在因左心疾病导致肺动脉高压的患者中,升高的RA/LA比值可能提示CpcPH,应考虑进行有创诊断检查。