• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经native 或prosthetic aortic valve endocarditis 患者行侵入性冠状动脉造影术。

Invasive Coronary Angiography in Patients with Native or Prosthetic Aortic Valve Endocarditis.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Freiburg, Heart Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Department of Cardiology and Angiology, University Hospital Freiburg, Heart Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Dec;72(8):579-586. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1757600. Epub 2022 Oct 18.

DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1757600
PMID:36257543
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) is essential to detect significant coronary artery disease (CAD) but is generally not recommended in patients with infective aortic valve endocarditis. This study aimed to evaluate the risks and benefits of preoperative ICA in patients before aortic valve replacement.

METHODS

Between March 2008 and September 2020, 232 patients were surgically treated for infectious endocarditis of the aortic valve. Sixty-seven (29%) of them underwent preoperative diagnostic ICA and were compared with the patients without preoperative ICA. We collected their baseline characteristics, including the neurological status, previous cardiac surgical procedures, and reviewed the preoperative echocardiograms and the ICA data. The intraoperative data and clinical outcomes after ICA and after surgery were evaluated.

RESULTS

ICA revealed a CAD in the majority of our patients ( = 36; 54%): One-vessel disease  = 19 (28%), two-vessel disease  = 6 (9%), and three-vessel disease  = 11 (16%). We observed no adverse events following preoperative diagnostic ICA, particularly no thromboembolic complications, including stroke, visceral, or lower body ischemia were detected. During surgical aortic valve replacement, concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 20 patients (30%). In patients with preoperative ICA, postoperative in-hospital mortality was significantly lower ( = 8 [12%] vs.  = 30 [18%];  < 0.001), while the incidence of postoperative bleeding was higher ( = 18 [27%] vs.  = 22 [13%];  = 0.022). The new-onset stroke incidence was 5% in each group.

CONCLUSION

Taking a multidisciplinary team approach, ICA is safe in selected patients with aortic valve infectious endocarditis with no adverse clinical outcomes, but significant clinical implications.

摘要

背景

经皮冠状动脉造影(ICA)是检测严重冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的必要手段,但一般不建议在感染性主动脉瓣心内膜炎患者中进行。本研究旨在评估术前 ICA 在主动脉瓣置换术前患者中的风险和获益。

方法

2008 年 3 月至 2020 年 9 月,232 例感染性主动脉瓣心内膜炎患者接受手术治疗。其中 67 例(29%)患者接受了术前诊断性 ICA,并与未行术前 ICA 的患者进行了比较。我们收集了他们的基线特征,包括神经状态、既往心脏手术史,并回顾了术前超声心动图和 ICA 数据。评估了 ICA 后的术中数据和临床结局以及手术后的临床结局。

结果

ICA 显示大多数患者( = 36;54%)存在 CAD:单支血管病变  = 19 例(28%),两支血管病变  = 6 例(9%),三支血管病变  = 11 例(16%)。我们没有观察到术前诊断性 ICA 后的不良事件,特别是没有发现血栓栓塞并发症,包括中风、内脏或下肢缺血。在接受外科主动脉瓣置换术的患者中,有 20 例(30%)同时进行了冠状动脉旁路移植术。在接受术前 ICA 的患者中,术后住院死亡率显著降低( = 8 [12%] vs.  = 30 [18%]; < 0.001),而术后出血发生率更高( = 18 [27%] vs.  = 22 [13%]; = 0.022)。每组的新发中风发生率均为 5%。

结论

采用多学科团队方法,对选择的主动脉瓣感染性心内膜炎患者进行 ICA 是安全的,不会导致不良临床结局,但具有重要的临床意义。

相似文献

1
Invasive Coronary Angiography in Patients with Native or Prosthetic Aortic Valve Endocarditis.经native 或prosthetic aortic valve endocarditis 患者行侵入性冠状动脉造影术。
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Dec;72(8):579-586. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1757600. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
2
Midterm Outcomes of Graft Insertion Technique for Redo Aortic Root Surgery.再次主动脉根部手术中移植物植入技术的中期结果
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025;31(1). doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.25-00047.
3
Limited versus full sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.主动脉瓣置换术的有限胸骨切开术与全胸骨切开术对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 10;4(4):CD011793. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011793.pub2.
4
Impact of previous cardiac surgery in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review.既往心脏手术对接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者的影响:一项系统评价。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2017 Oct;58(5):787-793. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.17.09636-7. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
5
Operation in the gray zone: is SAVR still useful in patients aged between 75 and 80 years?灰色地带的手术:75至80岁患者行外科主动脉瓣置换术是否仍有价值?
Future Cardiol. 2024 Dec-Dec;20(15-16):849-858. doi: 10.1080/14796678.2024.2433827. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
6
Coronary Physiological Indexes to Evaluate Myocardial Ischemia in Patients With Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Valve Replacement.评估行瓣膜置换术的主动脉瓣狭窄患者心肌缺血的冠状动脉生理指标
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jan 27;18(2):201-212. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.10.024. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
7
First year after surgery is the optimal period to define early prosthetic valve endocarditis: a cohort study.手术后第一年是定义早期人工瓣膜心内膜炎的最佳时期:一项队列研究。
Open Heart. 2025 Jun 26;12(1):e003378. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2025-003378.
8
Recapture technique for the surgical explantation of an infected self-expanding prosthesis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement prior to surgical aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后、外科主动脉瓣置换术前,用于外科取出感染性自膨胀人工心脏瓣膜的回收技术。
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2025 Jun 4;40(6). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaf135.
9
Recent Outcomes of Surgical Redo Aortic Valve Replacement in Prosthetic Valve Failure.人工瓣膜功能障碍患者再次行主动脉瓣置换术的近期疗效
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2025 Jun;73(4):279-287. doi: 10.1055/a-2281-1897. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
10
Meta-analysis of longitudinal comparison of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients at low to intermediate surgical risk.低至中度手术风险患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术纵向比较的荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2024 Dec 1;110(12):8097-8106. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002158.