GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):1901-1915. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09702-z. Epub 2022 Oct 18.
Several pivotal studies and international guidelines on the perioperative management of rectal cancer have been published. However, little is known about the current state of perioperative management of rectal cancer patients in clinical practice worldwide.
An online survey including 13 questions focusing on key topics related to the perioperative management of patients with rectal cancer was conducted among colorectal surgeons registered within the database of the Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer (IRCAD).
A total of 535 respondents from 89 countries participated in the survey. Most surgeons worked in the European region (40.9%). Two hundred and fifty-four respondents (47.5%) performed less than 25% of surgical procedures laparoscopically. The most commonly used definition of the upper limit of the rectum was a fixed distance from the anal verge (23.4%). Magnetic resonance imaging was used to define the upper limit of the rectum by 258 respondents (48.2%). During total mesorectal excision (TME), 301 respondents (56.3%) used a high-tie technique. The most commonly constructed anastomosis was an end-to-end anastomosis (68.2%) with the majority of surgeons performing a leak test intraoperatively (88.9%). A total of 355 respondents (66.4%) constructed a diverting ostomy, and the majority of these surgeons constructed an enterostomy (82%). A total of 208 respondents (39.3%) closed a stoma within 8 weeks. Lastly, 135 respondents (25.2%) introduced a solid diet on postoperative day 1.
There is considerable heterogeneity in the perioperative management of rectal cancer patients worldwide with several discrepancies between current international practice and recommendations from international guidelines. To achieve worldwide standardization in rectal cancer care, further research is needed to elucidate the cause of this heterogeneity and find ways of improved implementation of best practice recommendations.
已经发表了几项关于直肠癌围手术期管理的重要研究和国际指南。然而,对于全球范围内直肠癌患者围手术期管理的实际情况,我们知之甚少。
在研究癌症防治研究所(IRCAD)数据库中注册的结直肠外科医生中开展了一项包含 13 个问题的在线调查,这些问题集中于与直肠癌患者围手术期管理相关的关键主题。
共有来自 89 个国家的 535 名外科医生参与了这项调查。大多数外科医生在欧洲地区工作(40.9%)。254 名外科医生(47.5%)进行的腹腔镜手术不足 25%。最常用的直肠上界定义是距离肛缘的固定距离(23.4%)。258 名外科医生(48.2%)使用磁共振成像来确定直肠上界。在全直肠系膜切除术中,301 名外科医生(56.3%)使用高位结扎技术。最常见的吻合方式是端端吻合(68.2%),大多数外科医生会在术中进行漏诊测试(88.9%)。共有 355 名外科医生(66.4%)构建了转流性造口,其中大多数外科医生构建的是肠造口(82%)。共有 208 名外科医生(39.3%)在 8 周内关闭造口。最后,135 名外科医生(25.2%)在术后第 1 天开始给予固体饮食。
全球范围内直肠癌患者的围手术期管理存在较大差异,实际情况与国际指南推荐之间存在一些差异。为了实现直肠癌治疗的全球标准化,需要进一步研究以阐明这种差异的原因,并找到改进最佳实践建议实施的方法。